[Bug c++/78488] ICE when building call to inherited default constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488 --- Comment #1 from Eric Fiselier --- > GCC 6 exits with status 1 and without producing any diagnostics or an output > file Disregard that I was using a broken GCC 6. IDK how GCC 6 handles this bug.

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 --- Comment #7 from Elizebeth Punnoose --- I plan to send the patch to gcc-patches from my official mail id, in a couple of days. Please do let me know if there are any suggestions/comments.

[Bug c++/78488] New: ICE when building call to inherited default constructor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488 Bug ID: 78488 Summary: ICE when building call to inherited default constructor. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78434] Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434 --- Comment #3 from Marc Mutz --- Possibly. I couldn't check later versions because trunk failed to compile for me in i386.c.

[Bug tree-optimization/78455] [7 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78455 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78455] [7 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78455 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Nov 23 03:17:14 2016 New Revision: 242733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242733=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/78455 * tree-ssa-uninit.c

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- For e500v2, that patch moves things from a libgcc build failure to a glibc build failure having built libgcc successfully: many files in glibc fail to build with errors of the form:

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 > > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- > For 7.0, somebody changed

[Bug inline-asm/78487] asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Also I doubt this code is correct.

[Bug inline-asm/78487] asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Crashes at runtime or crashes inside GCC?

[Bug inline-asm/78487] asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487 --- Comment #2 from Stephan Beyer --- The following problem is only reproducible on one machine. I cannot reproduce it on any other machine. When compiling the attached C++ source file with g++ -O1 -fgcse, it crashes at the third cpuid call

[Bug inline-asm/78487] asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What is the error message which you are getting? Here is how GCC's cpuid.h header look like for cpuid: #define __cpuid(level, a, b, c, d) \ __asm__ ("cpuid\n\t"

[Bug c++/78487] New: asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487 Bug ID: 78487 Summary: asm cpuid code and -fgcse crashes Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/78476] snprintf(0, 0, ...) with known arguments not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78486] feature request: std::iu16stringstream std::ou16stringstream, and utf8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78486 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Do these exist in standard C++ at all? If not then I doubt they will be added to the GCC's library.

[Bug tree-optimization/68548] bogus "may be used uninitialized" (predicate analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68548 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/78476] snprintf(0, 0, ...) with known arguments not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 40122 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40122=edit Patch under test. Patch being tested (requires a patch for bug 78461).

[Bug fortran/78479] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 22 23:28:43 2016 New Revision: 242729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242729=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-22 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug go/78431] [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 Bug 78431 depends on bug 78432, which changed state. Bug 78432 Summary: [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 What|Removed

[Bug go/78431] [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/78432] [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/78431] [7 regression] ICE in go_append_padding, at godump.c:636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78431 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Nov 22 23:25:07 2016 New Revision: 242728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242728=gcc=rev Log: PR go/78431 PR go/78432 * godump.c (go_format_type):

[Bug go/78432] [7 Regression] -fdump-go-spec ICEs for aligned causing x32 libgo library to fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78432 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Nov 22 23:25:07 2016 New Revision: 242728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242728=gcc=rev Log: PR go/78431 PR go/78432 * godump.c (go_format_type):

[Bug c++/78486] New: feature request: std::iu16stringstream std::ou16stringstream, and utf8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78486 Bug ID: 78486 Summary: feature request: std::iu16stringstream std::ou16stringstream, and utf8 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/11196] _GNU_SOURCE vs. M_PI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11196 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krzysztof at jusiak dot net --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/78483] Error: reference to 'on_exit' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78483] Error: reference to 'on_exit' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Also on_exit is not part of the C++ standard at all.

[Bug libstdc++/78483] Error: reference to 'on_exit' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is most likely because _GNU_SOURCE is defined when compiling with C++ code in GNU C++ mode.

[Bug tree-optimization/78485] Missed scalarization in undefined use after going out of scope case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78485 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9) > I'm testing the following patch (which is a little more general) on a > powerpc64le-linux bootstrap to see if this survives. Ok, this patch passed bootstrap

[Bug tree-optimization/78485] Missed scalarization in undefined use after going out of scope case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78485 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Warning is not done at compile time but is handled at runtime via the sanitizers: -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope Enable sanitization of local variables to detect use-after-scope bugs. The option sets

[Bug tree-optimization/78485] Missed scalarization in undefined use after going out of scope case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Missed scalarization in |Missed scalarization in

[Bug tree-optimization/78485] New: Missed scalarization in simple read-from-clobber case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78485 Bug ID: 78485 Summary: Missed scalarization in simple read-from-clobber case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Bug testsuite/77684] many tree-prof testsuite failures in parallel make check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77684 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill --- FWIW I haven't been able to build this far using i386-elf. It fails in libbacktrace doing a configure probe because there isn't a crt0.o. I can't figure out why it isn't building libgloss. I have it and

[Bug c++/78484] if-else chain is not turned into a local jump table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78484 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/14799] [tree-ssa] convert a sequence of "if"s to a "switch" statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14799 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/78479] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/78484] New: if-else chain is not turned into a local jump table

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78484 Bug ID: 78484 Summary: if-else chain is not turned into a local jump table Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/78479] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 22 21:52:15 2016 New Revision: 242725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242725=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-22 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill --- That patch gets the build further but there is more wrong. __float128 isn't defined. /home/joel/test-gcc/b-i386-rtems4.12-gcc/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/joel/test-gcc/b-i386-rtems4.12-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc

[Bug middle-end/78461] [7 Regression] ICE: in operator+=, at gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:214

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78461 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 40121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40121=edit Patch under test. Testing the attached patch.

[Bug fortran/78290] Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290 --- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #2) > internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify_loc, at fortran/trans.c:159 > 0x835756e gfc_add_modify_loc(unsigned int, stmtblock_t*, tree_node*, > tree_node*) >

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner --- The IFmode usage is coming from HARD_REGNO_CALLER_SAVE_MODE(8, 2, TFmode) returning IFmode, which comes from choose_hard_reg_mode (8, 2, false). As a quick hack, I modified HARD_REGNO_CALLER_SAVE_MODE() to

[Bug libstdc++/78483] New: Error: reference to 'on_exit' is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483 Bug ID: 78483 Summary: Error: reference to 'on_exit' is ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78290] Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2

[Bug go/77910] [7 Regression] go: open zversion.go: no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77910 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance

[Bug go/77910] [7 Regression] go: open zversion.go: no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77910 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Nov 22 21:04:27 2016 New Revision: 242724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242724=gcc=rev Log: PR go/77910 cmd/go: don't check standard packages when using

[Bug libstdc++/71096] std::get did not work for nested derived classes from std::tuple if one element is empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71096 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #19) > Created attachment 40120 [details] > Updated patch > > Well, here's an update also for AVX512F. > > I can confirm the patch gives the same performance as the

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #18) > Created attachment 40119 [details] > Version that works (AVX only) > > Here is a version that should only do AVX stuff on Intel processors. > Optimization for

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40119|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/78451] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-22a.c: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline '_mm512_setzero_ps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78451 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 22 20:36:35 2016 New Revision: 242723 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242723=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78451 * config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h (_mm512_setzero_qi,

[Bug bootstrap/78477] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Stage2 issue, so most likely gcc was miscompiled during stage1. If you have a chance to run the testsuite on a non-bootstrap compiler, that often gives testcases that are much easier to debug...

[Bug c/78482] New: wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu

/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161122 (experimental) [trunk revision 242702] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c ; ./a.out 2

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- Last one, I promise. We don't need _Complex at all: extern void bar (void); long double foo (long double p1) { bar (); asm volatile ("# clobbers" ::: "r14", "r15", "r16", "r17", "r18",

[Bug libgcc/78481] New: libunwind.a conflicting recipes on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78481 Bug ID: 78481 Summary: libunwind.a conflicting recipes on AIX Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner --- Here's a smaller test case that induces spilling which leads to our ICE: extern void bar (void); _Complex foo (long double p1) { _Complex e; bar (); asm volatile ("# clobbers" :::

[Bug libgcc/78481] libunwind.a conflicting recipes on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78481 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78480] New: m68k-rtems compile error in libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78480 Bug ID: 78480 Summary: m68k-rtems compile error in libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[C++ PR 78252] illformed lamda?

Jason, digging further into the demangler crash of 78252, I think the root cause is ill-formed C++. Here's a further reduced testcase. template void for2 (T ) { } void Foo () { auto lam_1 = [](int &) { }; auto lam_2 = [](auto &) { }; // IIUC this is implicitly templatey for2 (lam_1);

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- This whole lra reload is due to us trying to split insns like the following: (insn 129 281 264 9 (set (subreg:TF (reg:TI 315 [orig:262 p1 ] [262]) 0) (reg/v:TF 173 [ p1 ])) "pr78458.i":17 1930

[Bug go/77910] [7 Regression] go: open zversion.go: no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77910 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Coincidentally I am going to submit the patch to fix this today. It was held up for a while in code review on the master repository. (The fix in the master repository is https://golang.org/cl/33295).

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- gdb show we don't like: (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x10a7d328 in lra_set_insn_recog_data (insn=0x3fffb5584340) at /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-reg-move_costs-base/gcc/lra.c:963 963

[Bug target/78458] [7 Regression] LRA ICE building libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnuspe e500v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78479] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- For 7.0, somebody changed i[34567]86-*-rtems* entry in libgcc/config.host to use t-softfp-sfdftf. Please test the following patch: Index: libgcc/config.host

[Bug fortran/78479] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas, these variants are ok : $ cat z3.f90 program p type t character(2) :: c(1) = 'a' // ['b'] end type type(t) :: z print *, len(z%c),

[Bug fortran/78479] New: ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78479 Bug ID: 78479 Summary: ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4135 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/78478] Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i386-rtems4.12 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence "Extension: Tab character in format" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 22 18:25:55 2016 New Revision: 242717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242717=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-22 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/78478] New: Compile Error for i386-rtems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478 Bug ID: 78478 Summary: Compile Error for i386-rtems Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/38319] Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- class_array_15.f03 leaks from line 65-66: allocate (indv(2), source = [individual(1, [99,999]), & individual(2, [999,])]) ==22496== HEAP SUMMARY: ==22496== in use at

[Bug go/77910] [7 Regression] go: open zversion.go: no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77910 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78477] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- sorry, no, just saw yesterday's changes to match.pd as a hint.

[Bug bootstrap/78477] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Did you bisect this to a specific commit? (I assumed so from the cc:, but the revision number does not match one of my patches)

[Bug middle-end/78409] Segfault in classify_object_over_fdes when throwing and exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78409 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski --- So, what exactly can I get you? I'm building https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/octave-4.2.0-1.fc26.src.rpm on Fedora rawhide. It fails during the tests: libinterp/dldfcn/__osmesa_print__.cc-tst

[Bug bootstrap/78477] New: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477 Bug ID: 78477 Summary: [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/78476] New: snprintf(0, 0, ...) with known arguments not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 Bug ID: 78476 Summary: snprintf(0, 0, ...) with known arguments not optimized away Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/78461] [7 Regression] ICE: in operator+=, at gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:214

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78461 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|c

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 40119 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40119=edit Version that works (AVX only) Here is a version that should only do AVX stuff on Intel processors. Optimization for

[Bug c++/77739] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or another option perhaps would be in cp_genericize_data note whether it is cp_genericize_tree called from cp_genericize or from elsewhere, and only replace invisiref parms if called from cp_genericize.

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #30 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on aarch64 for 6.3 as well. There's nothing more to do for aarch64 here. Dominik, do you intend to do any backports of the s390 patches? Or can we close this?

[Bug target/77822] [6 Regression] arm64 Error: immediate value out of range 0 to 63 at operand 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822 --- Comment #29 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Nov 22 16:55:16 2016 New Revision: 242709 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242709=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix PR target/77822: Use tighter predicates for

[Bug target/78451] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-22a.c: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline '_mm512_setzero_ps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78451 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 22 16:54:13 2016 New Revision: 242708 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242708=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78451 * gcc.target/i386/sse-22.c: Add

[Bug target/78451] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse-22a.c: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline '_mm512_setzero_ps'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78451 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 22 16:53:35 2016 New Revision: 242707 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242707=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78451 * config/i386/avx512vlintrin.h (_mm_setzero_di):

[Bug c++/77739] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem is that some expressions are genericized twice. First when genericizing the whole function, RESULT_DECL is determined to be is_invisiref_parm and therefore references to it are turned into

[Bug target/78386] [PPC] Optimization -O2 and higher cause math inconsistency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 Breno Leitao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Breno Leitao

[Bug target/78459] [7 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc string tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78459] [7 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc string tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/78434] Incorrect warning about missing align_val_t for placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78434 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77742] Warning about placement new for over-aligned type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77742 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.mutz at kdab dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/78465] [7 regression] 29_atomics/headers/atomic/macros.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78465] [7 regression] 29_atomics/headers/atomic/macros.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 22 16:31:19 2016 New Revision: 242704 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242704=gcc=rev Log: PR78465 Remove runtime tests for macros PR libstdc++/78465 *

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 --- Comment #7 from janus

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue Nov 22 16:06:46 2016 New Revision: 242703 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242703=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/78443

[Bug target/68467] libgcc, compilation for target m68k-linux breaks in linux_atomic.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers --- Created attachment 40117 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40117=edit preprocessed source Preprocessed source of file causing ICE attached. Compile with: -S -g -O2 -fPIC

[Bug libstdc++/78465] [7 regression] 29_atomics/headers/atomic/macros.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78475] Mixing objects form different g++ versions can crash a program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78475 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78475] Mixing objects form different g++ versions can crash a program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78475 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   3   >