[Bug target/61729] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/scoped1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- This testcase uses a 2-byte scoped enum, which doesn't get the integer promotions if I read the C++ standard correctly -- but it is passed via varargs, and the target code expects that to be promoted

[Bug translation/79093] Hard coded plural in builtins.c:3203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79093 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- We don't seem to have warning_at_n (only inform_n, warning_at_rich_loc_n, warning_n, error_n) but it could easily be added to handle this properly.

[Bug fortran/68887] [6/7 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/78768] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-length warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- This testcase fails on aarch64-linux-gnu.

[Bug translation/79093] New: Hard coded plural in builtins.c:3203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79093 Bug ID: 79093 Summary: Hard coded plural in builtins.c:3203 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: translation

[Bug testsuite/70583] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C -std=gnu++98 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |testsuite --- Comment #9 from John

[Bug c/78304] [7 Regression] -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c++/56973] crash when capturing variables in nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-04-24 00:00:00 |2017-1-14 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79090] [7 regression] DSE wrongly removes store at variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey

[Bug c++/79092] New: template: type ignored if value already instantiated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79092 Bug ID: 79092 Summary: template: type ignored if value already instantiated Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug debug/37022] internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37022 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/33562] [5/6 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562 --- Comment #31 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #29) > It's still a regression for 5/6, so it should stay open until those releases > are no longer supported. Note the "7" in the regression marker is gone. Sorry,

[Bug translation/48555] [fr] gibberish warning (déréférencement du pointeur type-punned brisera les strictes d'aliases)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48555 Frederic Marchal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fmarchal at perso dot be --- Comment

[Bug translation/64934] The french text of --version is not proper french

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64934 Frederic Marchal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fmarchal at perso dot be --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78626] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78626] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Jan 14 16:52:18 2017 New Revision: 244467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244467=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78626 PR rtl-optimization/78727 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Jan 14 16:52:18 2017 New Revision: 244467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244467=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78626 PR rtl-optimization/78727 *

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- I have a patch bootstrapping, let's not close this yet.

[Bug c/79089] [7 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/78994] -Ofast makes aarch64 C++ benchmark slower for A53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994 --- Comment #6 from PeteVine --- It's possible I already had that patch included in my build, but in case I didn't, here's a quick addition to the previous result: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1701143-TA-GCCCOMPAR66 The c-ray thunderx

[Bug c++/79091] New: [7 regression] ICE in write_unnamed_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091 Bug ID: 79091 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in write_unnamed_type Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/79027] fold-const.c:11104:1: internal compiler error: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79027 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-01-11, at 8:18 AM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > The error doesn't occur if I add > "--disable-lto --without-cloog > --without-ppl" to the configure command. I would suspect

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Jan 14 13:29:29 2017 New Revision: 244466 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244466=gcc=rev Log: Testcase from pr72749 PR target/72749 *

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Sat Jan 14 13:24:46 2017 New Revision: 244465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244465=gcc=rev Log: Avoid PR72749 by not using unspecs Rather than using unspecs in doloop insns to

[Bug c/79089] [7 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79088] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78660] [7 Regression] 7.0 bootstrap fail on mips64el-unknow-linux: configure-stage2-target-libgcc' failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou --- > The key (I think) is that the following sequence of 3 instructions ends up > being combined into 1 but the resulting instruction leaves the upper 32-bits > of reg 316 entirely undefined. Eventually this

[Bug tree-optimization/79090] [7 regression] DSE wrongly removes store at variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|[7 regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/79090] [7 regression] DSE wrongly removing store at variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79090] New: [7 regression] DSE wrongly removing store at variable offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090 Bug ID: 79090 Summary: [7 regression] DSE wrongly removing store at variable offset Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c/79089] New: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 Bug ID: 79089 Summary: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka --- Hello, did the Gap scores on arm too? Both Itanium and PPC testers seems to show improved gap scores, so hope arm and the other ppc tester too.