https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318
--- Comment #1 from John Simon ---
Full example:
#include
using namespace std;
class Foo
{
private:
int a;
public:
Foo():a(0){};
&operator int() {return a;}; // this fails with Clang
};
int main()
{
Foo foo;
int x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318
Bug ID: 79318
Summary: conversion member function preceded with & is not
marked as error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79317
Bug ID: 79317
Summary: logq is returning double precision results
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libqua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79316
Bug ID: 79316
Summary: Default parameter values in explicit deduction guides
do not work
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:37:52AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Your code looks bogus. If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-09-23 00:00:00 |2017-2-1
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
gamess also fails the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38170
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79315
Bug ID: 79315
Summary: ICE while building SPEC CPU 2006 FP with -Ofast
-ftree-parallelize-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77704
htfy96 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lz96 at foxmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from htf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79314
Bug ID: 79314
Summary: friend function with qualified name definition
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
--- Comment #1 from Michael Levy ---
It looks like I accidentally attached the toy problem with the offending lines
commented out... uncomment lines 27 & 29 to create build issue. Sorry!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79313
Bug ID: 79313
Summary: associate statement inside openmp loop breaks OMP
intrinisics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59319
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79268
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79268
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Jan 31 22:57:55 2017
New Revision: 245075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-01-31 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79295
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So operands[0] is wrong (should be an AltiVec reg, is an FP reg).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63238
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79312
Bug ID: 79312
Summary: Empty array in assignment not correctly type-checked
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311
Bug ID: 79311
Summary: internal compiler error: generate_finalization_wrapper
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:42:01 2017
New Revision: 245074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/79305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79310
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79304
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79304
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:38:00 2017
New Revision: 245073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79304
* error.c (dump_expr) : Don't print .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61520
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79298
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79298
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:30:42 2017
New Revision: 245072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE with spelling hints within explicit namespace aliases (PR c++/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79310
Bug ID: 79310
Summary: -Wnonnull false positive on strlen after strstr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:20:10 2017
New Revision: 245071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/79305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43965
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, patch
--- Comment #1 from Martin S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79309
Bug ID: 79309
Summary: incorrectly bounded calls to strncat in adaint.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 31 20:22:43 2017
New Revision: 245070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Prevent ICEs due to bogus substring locations (PR preprocessor/79210)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"internal compiler error: |[7 Regression] "internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78640
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 31 19:37:11 2017
New Revision: 245069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79290
* typeck.c (build_ptrmemfunc_access_expr):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79298
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02418.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79143
lucdanton at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:50:31 2017
New Revision: 245068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/79305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79307
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note -fsanitize=address complains about this (though
==3971==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-underflow on address
0x7ffef8cabe50 at pc 0x004011db bp 0x7ffef8cabe10 sp 0x7ffef8cabe08
rather than use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79307
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
If I remove the first one, I do get a warning
x.c: In function 'int main()':
x.c:5:47: warning: '' is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
void DoSomething() {cout << "int:" << a_ <<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:27:06PM +, mexas at bristol dot ac.uk wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
>
> --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
> I think the program is standar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:00:43PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> The above will clearly never be built. In fact, a causal perusal
> of c99_protos.h shows that none of the fallback functions in
> c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
I think the program is standard conforming.
So strictly speaking the compiler is not standard conforming here, right?
I have some tests for complex intrinsics, which I want
to test on real32, real64 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308
--- Comment #1 from bjhend ---
Created attachment 40640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40640&action=edit
Complete compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78597
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308
Bug ID: 79308
Summary: Internal compilation error on specialization of nested
template classes
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79253
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67273
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79253
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:05:37 2017
New Revision: 245067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67273
PR c++/79253
* pt.c: (instantiate_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67273
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 31 18:05:37 2017
New Revision: 245067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67273
PR c++/79253
* pt.c: (instantiate_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79307
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44974
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven.spark at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79307
Bug ID: 79307
Summary: g++ misses warning for reference on temporary that
invokes undefined behaviour
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170
--- Comment #4 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, should be fixed with 245041 -- different instruction sequence and a better
memcmp/strncmp regtest to catch this and other things.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67273
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.auer at cgi dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67951
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] internal |[6 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79304
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79306
Bug ID: 79306
Summary: ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pch
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54810
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Yeah, but the user can write such dependences himself so ideally we have
> a way to undo them, like by using local scratch memory? So
You are right. LLVM-Pol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79305
Bug ID: 79305
Summary: real128 - undefined reference to cexpl
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79298
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
Bug 70729 depends on bug 77318, which changed state.
Bug 77318 Summary: [7 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O
(internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 77318, which changed state.
Bug 77318 Summary: [7 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/pr68279.f90 -O
(internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #8)
> LIM in general is bad for loop transforms: it introduces loop carried
> dependences. If we can move graphite before LIM that would solve some
> problems.
Yeah,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79264
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79284
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79264
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 31 15:10:41 2017
New Revision: 245065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245065&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79264
* lambda.c (maybe_generic_this_capture): De
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop ---
LIM in general is bad for loop transforms: it introduces loop carried
dependences. If we can move graphite before LIM that would solve some problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop ---
The fix looks good. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 31 14:44:37 2017
New Revision: 245064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245064&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77318
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79304
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79284
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664
--- Comment #17 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #16)
> > That isn't an argument for -fno-sched-spec, it is an argument for a cost
> > model which better matches the cost of the transformation, using the
> > in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn ---
> That isn't an argument for -fno-sched-spec, it is an argument for a cost
> model which better matches the cost of the transformation, using the
> information available, without bloating the automaton.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664
--- Comment #15 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #14)
> I'm not sure how to read your remark. An insn where the result is
> not used is not on the critical path by definition; and you seem to
> be arguing fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79303
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
segfault occurs within ISL with isl 0.14 but not with isl 0.16.1 so not sure if
worth pursuing (well, I guess not).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79303
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79297
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Even from the same package...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Subversion id 245059 fixes the majority of the issues. However, there are some
enhancements that should be added for GCC 8:
1) Add support for converting IEEE 128-bit floating point to/from char/short
da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79297
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 79297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79302
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
ICEs with:
./cc1 -fpreprocessed pr79302.i -march=haswell -mmmx -mno-3dnow -msse -msse2
-msse3 -mssse3 -mno-sse4a -mcx16 -msahf -mmovbe -maes -mno-sha -mpclmul
-mpopcnt -mabm -mno-lwp -mfma -mno-fma4 -mno-xop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78597
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jan 31 13:38:35 2017
New Revision: 245059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-31 Michael Meissner
PR target/78597
PR t
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
