[Bug middle-end/79386] New: [7 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in cprop w/ -O2 on 32-bit BE powerpc

2017-02-05 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
0.0_alpha20170205/work/gcc-7-20170205/gcc/toplev.c:333 0x2ed1a25f149 find_bypass_set /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20170205/work/gcc-7-20170205/gcc/cprop.c:1474 0x2ed1a25f149 bypass_block /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20

[Bug c++/79373] For loop optimization bug: condition ignored

2017-02-05 Thread steven.p.pigeon at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79373 --- Comment #10 from Steven Pigeon --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > (In reply to Steven Pigeon from comment #7) > > I do understand that this is what happens (the code is fixed by promoting > > int32_t t=x to int64_t t=x) but

[Bug c++/79385] New: ICE on (likely) valid C++11 code on x86_64-linux-gnu:

2017-02-05 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170205 (experimental) [trunk revision 245187] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c -std=c++11 small.cpp small.cpp: In instantiation of ‘constexpr int A::f() const [with T =

[Bug c++/79378] lambda init-capture adds const

2017-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79378 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/79384] Clang doesn't like variant's std::visit

2017-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79384 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/79373] For loop optimization bug: condition ignored

2017-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79373 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Steven Pigeon from comment #7) > I do understand that this is what happens (the code is fixed by promoting > int32_t t=x to int64_t t=x) but the undefined behavior affects a variable > (and

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-02-05, at 1:12 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The bug is that we don't set TREE_PUBLIC for ctor function on collect2 path. > This bug probably existed forever but triggered

[Bug libstdc++/79384] New: Clang doesn't like variant's std::visit

2017-02-05 Thread eric at efcs dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79384 Bug ID: 79384 Summary: Clang doesn't like variant's std::visit Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/79359] Squaring a complex float gives inefficient code with or without -ffast-math

2017-02-05 Thread drraph at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79359 --- Comment #1 from Raphael C --- In case it's of any help, here is an explanation of the assembly that ICC gives with -fp-model strict. R = real and C = complex. Here "x" just means don't know or unused. We start with xmm0 = {x, x, C, R}.

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/79383] New: USE statement error

2017-02-05 Thread walt.brainerd at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 Bug ID: 79383 Summary: USE statement error Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug fortran/79382] DTIO ICE

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test compiles and executes if I remove the line public :: write (formatted)

[Bug fortran/79382] DTIO ICE

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- I would aprechiate if someone could bootstrap this Index: cgraphunit.c === --- cgraphunit.c(revision 245196) +++ cgraphunit.c

[Bug fortran/79382] New: DTIO ICE

2017-02-05 Thread walt.brainerd at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79382 Bug ID: 79382 Summary: DTIO ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 40670 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40670=edit testcase reproducing on current mainline (no need for Java) OK, I have eliminated those java extensions from the

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, interpret.cc isn't pure C++ code, it is C++ code with heavy C++ JNI extensions (which were removed).

[Bug ipa/78027] [6 Regression] ICE in new_oacc_loop_routine, at omp-low.c:19000

2017-02-05 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027 --- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Last I heard in Jakub was going to look for a better solution. My patch is still in trunk, but if necessary I could always revert it.

[Bug tree-optimization/79347] [7 regression] vect_do_peeling is messing up profile

2017-02-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Feb 5 17:16:52 2017 New Revision: 245196 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245196=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-ssa/79347 * cfgloopmanip.c (lv_adjust_loop_entry_edge,

[Bug target/70341] [5/6/7 Regression] cost model for addresses is incorrect, slsr is using reg + reg + CST for arm

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70341 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at redhat dot com,

[Bug translation/79332] Several bugs related to translation in gcc 7.1-b20170101

2017-02-05 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79332 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- In config/ft32/ft32.opt, the explanation for mnodiv is missing the period at the end.

[Bug c++/71236] ICE on invalid code

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug translation/79332] Several bugs related to translation in gcc 7.1-b20170101

2017-02-05 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79332 --- Comment #1 from Roland Illig --- How am I supposed to translate "tid.y;" in config/nvptx/nbptx.c? I suppose it is a bug in the program that extracts translatable strings from the source code. In case it is not, there must be a translator

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrick at motec dot com.au ---

[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/79338] [6 Regression] Memory leak in tree-parloops.c

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79338 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

2017-02-05 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78985] [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by -Wuninitialized

2017-02-05 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sun Feb 5 15:51:13 2017 New Revision: 245195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245195=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/78985 * config/s390/s390.c (s390_gimplify_va_arg):

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 15:43:03 2017 New Revision: 245194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245194=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug ipa/78027] [6/7 Regression] ICE in new_oacc_loop_routine, at omp-low.c:19000

2017-02-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/79311] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:1992

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||37336 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/79311] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:1992

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79311 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE disappears if I comment the two lines final:: tens_signature_dtor!dtor but not the line final:: tens_header_dtor

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-02-05, at 7:25 AM, graham.stott at btinternet dot com wrote: > libjava has been removed from gcc 7 ?? The bug was not removed because it occurs compiling c++ code. -- John David

[Bug ipa/79375] gcc/ipa-prop.c:203:32: runtime error: reference binding to null pointer of type 'struct vec' after revision r244802

2017-02-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 40669 [details] > Fix I cannot tell if this patch fixes all the issues you saw, but at least it fixes the one reported in this PR. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug c++/79381] New: [concepts] Call to template function with type-requirement unsatisfied not rejected

2017-02-05 Thread d25fe0be at yandex dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79381 Bug ID: 79381 Summary: [concepts] Call to template function with type-requirement unsatisfied not rejected Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/79344] [7 Regression] segmentation faults and run-time errors

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79344 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79335] [7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised in value get_scalar_to_descriptor_type(tree_node*, symbol_attribute) (trans-expr.c:53)

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79335 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 13:05:10 2017 New Revision: 245193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245193=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/78958] Unallocated memory access after SOURCE-ALLOCATEing unlimited polymorphic object

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 12:42:31 2017 New Revision: 245192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245192=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations

2017-02-05 Thread drfiemost at email dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 --- Comment #13 from Leandro Nini --- I've applied the patch to the 6.3.1 20170202 snapshot and the former test compiles but this one triggers the same error: typedef struct { float x1; } bx; typedef struct { int w; short o; } T2P; T2P a;

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread graham.stott at btinternet dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #7 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com --- libjava has been removed from gcc 7 ?? Original message From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" Date: 05/02/2017 12:12 (GMT+00:00) To:

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

2017-02-05 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2016-07-13

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #27 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting on week for regression reports before closing.

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

2017-02-05 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 --- Comment #26 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Feb 5 12:02:15 2017 New Revision: 245191 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245191=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2017-02-05 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug target/79353] [7 regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

2017-02-05 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79353 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > Thanks for reporting the problem. Thanks a lot for fixing it :).

[Bug c++/79373] For loop optimization bug: condition ignored

2017-02-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79373 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79353] [7 regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

2017-02-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
): Replace 'U' constraint with 'r', 'm' constraint with 'T' and !TARGET_ARCH64 with TARGET_ARCH32. (atomic_storedi_1): Likewise. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/sparc/20170205-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/sparc/sync.md trunk/gcc/testsuite

[Bug target/79353] [7 regression] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3773

2017-02-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79353 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---