[Bug fortran/38573] Missing markers for translation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38573 --- Comment #13 from Frederic Marchal --- (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #12) > (In reply to Frederic Marchal from comment #11) > > I suspect a misunderstanding here. Forgive me if I state the obvious. > > > > The fix is not to move the

[Bug c++/80038] Random segfault using local vectors in Cilk function [Regression 6/7]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038 --- Comment #28 from Xi Ruoyao --- Created attachment 41028 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41028=edit testcase

[Bug c++/80038] Random segfault using local vectors in Cilk function [Regression 6/7]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038 --- Comment #27 from Xi Ruoyao --- Created attachment 41027 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41027=edit patch proposal Now I've prepared a patch. It reverted r227423 (but preserved its testcase) and used a more conforming

[Bug target/79509] m68k/coldfire: Internal error, aborting at dw2gencfi.c:214 in emit_expr_encoded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79509 Waldemar Brodkorb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org --- Comment

[Bug c++/80157] New: Spurious "Wsign-conversion" warning with const, size_t, array.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80157 Bug ID: 80157 Summary: Spurious "Wsign-conversion" warning with const, size_t, array. Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/38573] Missing markers for translation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38573 --- Comment #12 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Frederic Marchal from comment #11) > I suspect a misunderstanding here. Forgive me if I state the obvious. > > The fix is not to move the translation mark around. I think moving the

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 --- Comment #3 from Palmer Dabbelt --- Thanks for looking at this. If there's anything I can do to help feel free to ask, but from my understand this isn't a RISC-V backend problem so I'm not going to put this on my TODO list unless something

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|bergner at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/79838] inconsistent trailing dot in diagnostic "The name %qs has already been used"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79838 --- Comment #1 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 22:04:27 2017 New Revision: 246409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246409=gcc=rev Log: Also fixed by revision r246391. 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/79838] inconsistent trailing dot in diagnostic "The name %qs has already been used"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79838 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80072] [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1 with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80072] [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1 with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 21:52:13 2017 New Revision: 246408 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246408=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80072 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (struct

[Bug target/79509] m68k/coldfire: Internal error, aborting at dw2gencfi.c:214 in emit_expr_encoded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79509 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79853] diagnostics: double space in "Assumed or deferred"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79853 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80011] diagnostics: trailing space in "Implicitly declared"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80011 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79602] translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79844] diagnostics: extra space at end of line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79844 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79859] diagnostics: argument quoted twice in "No initializer for allocatable compoonent"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed. This a regression which appeared between revisions r245767 > (2017-02-28, compiles) and r246000 (2017-03-09, error), > likely r245596 (pr79382). ^^^obviously wrong!-( I did

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/80156] New: Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Bug ID: 80156 Summary: Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/39239] Reject SAVEd variables EQUIVALENCEd to a COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239 --- Comment #14 from koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: koenigni Date: Wed Mar 22 19:12:24 2017 New Revision: 246406 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246406=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-12 Nicolas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/39239] Reject SAVEd variables EQUIVALENCEd to a COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239 --- Comment #13 from koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: koenigni Date: Wed Mar 22 19:08:36 2017 New Revision: 246405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246405=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Nicolas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/79864] Implicit type conversion on assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable segfaults.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79863] Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/47344] [5/6/7 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 Bug 47344 depends on bug 63191, which changed state. Bug 63191 Summary: [5/6 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [5/6 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/80110] [6 Regression] error: statement marked for throw, but doesn’t w/ -fsanitize=thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] error: |[6 Regression] error:

[Bug c++/80129] wrong code with ternary struct assignment to const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80129 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug c++/80141] ICE with pragma omp declare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80141 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug c++/80141] ICE with pragma omp declare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80141 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:53:47 2017 New Revision: 246403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246403=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80141 * semantics.c (finish_omp_clause) : Call

[Bug sanitizer/78158] Strange data race detection with thread sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78158 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:46:54 2017 New Revision: 246402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246402=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78158 * tsan/tsan_interface_atomic.cc: Cherry-pick

[Bug c++/80129] wrong code with ternary struct assignment to const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80129 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:45:48 2017 New Revision: 246401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246401=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80129 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs) : Clear

[Bug sanitizer/80110] [6/7 Regression] error: statement marked for throw, but doesn’t w/ -fsanitize=thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:35:43 2017 New Revision: 246400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246400=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80110 * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=thread): Document

[Bug sanitizer/80110] [6/7 Regression] error: statement marked for throw, but doesn’t w/ -fsanitize=thread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80110 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:34:44 2017 New Revision: 246399 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246399=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/80110 * tsan.c: Include tree-eh.h.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [5/6/7 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Mar 22 18:33:37 2017 New Revision: 246398 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246398=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/63191 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 --- Comment #2 from Wojciech Migda --- It might be that this is Linaro-only bug. Please do what you feel is best.

[Bug target/80123] libgomp tests pr66199-2.c and pr66199-5.c fail with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80123 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Wed Mar 22 17:47:55 2017 New Revision: 246394 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246394=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-21 Aaron Sawdey PR

[Bug target/80123] libgomp tests pr66199-2.c and pr66199-5.c fail with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80123 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is actually the *-lib.c files that should be -fno-lto. But it seems all the source files are compiled/linked using one driver invocation, so I have no idea how to do -fno-lto just for one file.

[Bug lto/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, is there a way to request -fno-lto compilation of the gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/lib/*.c TUs? The rest probably can stay -flto when testing lto.

[Bug fortran/79863] Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80152] Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dröge --- Because the value of uninitialized variables is implementation-defined, and as such gcc can freely set it to anything that it wants? That would explain it then, yes. Thanks

[Bug middle-end/80152] Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Sebastian Dröge from comment #3) > But even after optimization, there would be the argc!=1 code path left, > which uses the uninitialized foo. No, the optimization sets foo to 1 always, and argc

[Bug c++/80141] ICE with pragma omp declare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/79853] diagnostics: double space in "Assumed or deferred"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79853 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 16:29:30 2017 New Revision: 246391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246391=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/79859] diagnostics: argument quoted twice in "No initializer for allocatable compoonent"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859 --- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 16:29:30 2017 New Revision: 246391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246391=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/79844] diagnostics: extra space at end of line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79844 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 16:29:30 2017 New Revision: 246391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246391=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/80011] diagnostics: trailing space in "Implicitly declared"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80011 --- Comment #2 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 16:29:30 2017 New Revision: 246391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246391=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/79602] translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602 --- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Mar 22 16:29:30 2017 New Revision: 246391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246391=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/71796] Link error referencing compiler generated symbol __vtab_xxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71796 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|dominiq

[Bug fortran/80011] diagnostics: trailing space in "Implicitly declared"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80011 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-03/msg00086.html.

[Bug fortran/79859] diagnostics: argument quoted twice in "No initializer for allocatable compoonent"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-03/msg00086.html.

[Bug fortran/79844] diagnostics: extra space at end of line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79844 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-03/msg00086.html.

[Bug fortran/79853] diagnostics: double space in "Assumed or deferred"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79853 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-03/msg00086.html.

[Bug fortran/79602] translation: globally replace '%s' with %qs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-03/msg00086.html.

[Bug target/80154] sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Storing into 10 bytes is not possible. For 80bit precision, only 96 or 128 bit as the storage unit is available.

[Bug target/80154] sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Gutson --- Documentation is confusing: -m96bit-long-double -m128bit-long-double These switches control the size of "long double" type. ... -mlong-double-64 -mlong-double-80

[Bug target/79804] ICE in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79804 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Component|inline-asm |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug inline-asm/79804] ICE in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79804 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/80154] sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c/80154] sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/80142] [7 Regression] Warning: No location in expression ... with -O / -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80142 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77498] [7 regression] Performance drop after r239414 on spec2000/172mgrid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC|thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #13 from

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] New: [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Bug ID: 80155 Summary: [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/80142] [7 Regression] Warning: No location in expression ... with -O / -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80142 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Mar 22 15:20:17 2017 New Revision: 246388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246388=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-22 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/80142

[Bug middle-end/80152] Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dröge --- But even after optimization, there would be the argc!=1 code path left, which uses the uninitialized foo.

[Bug c/80154] New: sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154 Bug ID: 80154 Summary: sizeof(long double) == 16 even with -mlong-double-80 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] New: ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 Bug ID: 80153 Summary: ivopt generate wrong code Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79604] attribute noreturn inconsistent between C and C++, undocumented for function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79604 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Another inconsistency is that when the noreturn attributes decorates a function parameter that is a pointer to a function, C considers it to be a part of the function's type while C++ does not. That means

[Bug lto/79587] ICE in streamer_write_gcov_count_stream, at data-streamer-out.c:343 while building Python 3.6.0 with PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 22 14:59:44 2017 New Revision: 246387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246387=gcc=rev Log: Backport r245647 2017-03-22 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug lto/79587] ICE in streamer_write_gcov_count_stream, at data-streamer-out.c:343 while building Python 3.6.0 with PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80046] [5/6/7 Regression] Explicit interface required for at (1): pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80046 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slomo at coaxion dot net --- Comment

[Bug fortran/80142] [7 Regression] Warning: No location in expression ... with -O / -ffrontend-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80142 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 80152, which changed state. Bug 80152 Summary: Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/80152] Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/80152] Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24639 --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/80152] New: Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80152 Bug ID: 80152 Summary: Not warning anymore about usage of uninitialized variables Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 22 14:32:42 2017 New Revision: 246385 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246385=gcc=rev Log: Backport r246119 2017-03-22 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug lto/79587] ICE in streamer_write_gcov_count_stream, at data-streamer-out.c:343 while building Python 3.6.0 with PGO and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 22 14:32:24 2017 New Revision: 246384 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246384=gcc=rev Log: Backport r245647 2017-03-22 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Mar 22 14:31:55 2017 New Revision: 246383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246383=gcc=rev Log: Backport r245155 2017-03-22 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug go/80128] [7 regression] go1: internal compiler error: in write_specific_type_functions, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80128 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80148] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov --- > Why doesn't the kernel use atomic builtins instead? There was a recent discussion here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kasan-dev/3sNHjjb4GCI In short: --- Trivially, The C++ model doesn't

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak when allocating a component derived type in a recursive subroutine (gfortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80148] operand has impossible constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/80029] [6/7 Regression] valgrind error in new_omp_context(omp_region_type) (gimplify.c:400)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug go/80128] [7 regression] go1: internal compiler error: in write_specific_type_functions, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80128 --- Comment #7 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Mar 22 13:59:01 2017 New Revision: 246382 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246382=gcc=rev Log: PR go/80128 compiler: check backend alignment for memequalNN

[Bug c++/80150] [6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error when in in try_one_overload, at cp/pt.c:18903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80150 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/80029] [6/7 Regression] valgrind error in new_omp_context(omp_region_type) (gimplify.c:400)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029 --- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Wed Mar 22 13:52:10 2017 New Revision: 246381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246381=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80029 gcc/ * gimplify.c

[Bug go/80128] [7 regression] go1: internal compiler error: in write_specific_type_functions, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:2002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80128 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- Works with a cross compiler.

[Bug tree-optimization/80072] [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1 with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Comment on attachment 41020 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41020 gcc7-pr80072.patch Looks good.

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- Jakub, thanks for the confirmation that force_gimple_operand is unnecessary. Christophe, thanks for testing. Thus I am now regstrapping: Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr79908.c

[Bug target/80080] S390: Isses with emitted cs-instructions for __atomic builtins.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80080 --- Comment #8 from Dominik Vogt --- The patch has a performance regression on s390x. .L1 lr %r3,%r1 cs %r1,%r4,0(%r2) jne .L1 becomes .L1 cs %r1,%r3,0(%r2) ipm %r4 sra %r4,28 cijne %r4,0,.L1

[Bug tree-optimization/80072] [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1 with -O3 -march=broadwell/skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80072 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41020 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41020=edit gcc7-pr80072.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/77498] [7 regression] Performance drop after r239414 on spec2000/172mgrid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77498 > > --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme

  1   2   3   >