[Bug tree-optimization/80216] [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: law Date: Tue Mar 28 03:22:25 2017 New Revision: 246517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246517=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80162 * tree-ssa-dom.c

[Bug libfortran/78793] list_read.c: 7 * possible unintended fallthrough ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78793 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/78496] [7 Regression] Missed opportunities for jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law

[Bug tree-optimization/80216] [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80162] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Mar 28 03:22:25 2017 New Revision: 246517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246517=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/80162 * tree-ssa-dom.c

[Bug c++/80230] error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels --- how did I misunderstand the error message? it's pretty clear. the compiler says the type is size_t when it really should be saying int, and size_t is for x32 an unsigned int and for x64 it's unsigned long

[Bug c++/80230] error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- You are misunderstanding the error message. What it is trying to say the type of vecstruct[vecstructfromi(A)] is size_t and not the struct type you think it is.

[Bug c++/80230] New: error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80230 Bug ID: 80230 Summary: error accessing struct member, error says it's size_t, but it is int Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/80229] [7 Regression] shared_ptr gives an error when is_function is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80229 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80229] New: [7 Regression] shared_ptr gives an error when is_function is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80229 Bug ID: 80229 Summary: [7 Regression] shared_ptr gives an error when is_function is true Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/80228] inconsistent handling of ctor initialization of flexible array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80228 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/71496] Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 228022.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496 Tobias Netzel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tobias.netzel at googlemail dot co

[Bug c++/80228] New: inconsistent handling of ctor initialization of flexible array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80228 Bug ID: 80228 Summary: inconsistent handling of ctor initialization of flexible array members Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 --- Comment #6 from Mike Stump --- Comment on attachment 41059 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41059 Result from running script The . and .-1, .+1, .-2 forms are fine. The .-62 forms are as problematic as the original I

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > Created attachment 41058 [details] > tested patch tested in combination with fix for PR80220.

[Bug testsuite/80220] relative line numbers don't work when put between braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80220 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41056|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41059 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41059=edit Result from running script

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41057|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/80227] New: [4.6/5/6/7 Regression] SFINAE ambiguity with a pointer to array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80227 Bug ID: 80227 Summary: [4.6/5/6/7 Regression] SFINAE ambiguity with a pointer to array argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/68028] [5/6/7 regression] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point" with LTO on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-pc-linux|powerpc-*-*

[Bug target/80162] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on

[Bug target/80102] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80162] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code (address of register variable)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80162 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 27 21:07:21 2017 New Revision: 246512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246512=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/80162 c-family/ * c-common.c

[Bug target/80102] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 27 21:00:35 2017 New Revision: 246511 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246511=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80102 * reg-notes.def (REG_CFA_NOTE): Define. Use it for

[Bug gcov-profile/80224] gcov -i crashes with two arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80224 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80191] diagnostic placeholder "new initializer" must be marked for translation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, not if I'm right that it's referring to new-initializer. The C++ standard defines a new-expression and a new-initializer, and those are related to the 'new' keyword, but they are not keywords.

[Bug c++/80191] diagnostic placeholder "new initializer" must be marked for translation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80191 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80206] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80206 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- So far I have: --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md.jj 2017-03-16 17:18:42.0 +0100 +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.md 2017-03-27 21:26:23.570172997 +0200 @@ -7135,19 +7135,22 @@ (define_expand "_vextract< {

[Bug c++/69697] incorrect initialization of static flexible array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69697 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #72 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #69) > As I noted elsewhere union members in C++ seem to be pure convenience and a > union contains implicit members of all types (well, somehow factor in >

[Bug go/80226] ICE gimple-expr.c:474 on Go function returning multiple empty struct/array values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80226 --- Comment #1 from Than McIntosh --- This seems to do the trick: diff --git a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc index ed6fc2c6105..62baa91fab8 100644 --- a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc +++ b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc @@ -2081,7 +2081,8 @@

[Bug go/80226] New: ICE gimple-expr.c:474 on Go function returning multiple empty struct/array values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80226 Bug ID: 80226 Summary: ICE gimple-expr.c:474 on Go function returning multiple empty struct/array values Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #71 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #68) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #65) > > It accesses b, but it doesn't access the object stored in b's char[N] member > > via placement new. > >

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #23 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Mar 27 19:35:35 2017 New Revision: 246509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246509=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-27 Michael Meissner

[Bug fortran/78670] [F03] Incorrect file position with namelist read under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78670 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) > > Janus, the fix for this bug depends on your patch for pr78661. I would like > > to incorporate yours into the solution to

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #22 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon Mar 27 19:19:00 2017 New Revision: 246508 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246508=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-03-27 Michael Meissner

[Bug fortran/78670] [F03] Incorrect file position with namelist read under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78670 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4) > Janus, the fix for this bug depends on your patch for pr78661. I would like > to incorporate yours into the solution to this PR if ok with you. Sure,

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #70 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #69) > As I noted elsewhere union members in C++ seem to be pure convenience and a > union contains implicit members of all types (well, somehow factor in >

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #69 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On March 27, 2017 8:11:10 PM GMT+02:00, "matz at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 > >--- Comment #68 from Michael Matz ---

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #68 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #65) > It accesses b, but it doesn't access the object stored in b's char[N] member > via placement new. Okay, let's go with this. So the copying of the union is

[Bug middle-end/80208] DJGPP max object file alignment regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80208 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The patch submission was . The rationale there stands, both that as a standard requirement this must be an error or a pedwarn

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #67 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #66) > The operator semantics described in clause 5 [expr] apply to the built-in > operators, not any overloaded operators. Assignment of classes is always > done by

[Bug target/80103] ICE in output_1144, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:2298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80103 --- Comment #2 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Mon Mar 27 17:04:07 2017 New Revision: 246505 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246505=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-03-27 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug target/54063] [5/6/7 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.9/5/6/7 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- That's why I changed the target milestone to gcc-8 :-)

[Bug target/54063] [5/6/7 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.9/5/6/7 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #66 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #64) > I would find it extremely surprising if in > > a = b; > > the RHS doesn't constitute an access to the value of object 'b' (even > depending on the type of

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 Mike Stump changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikestump at comcast dot net --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/80197] pgo dramatically pessimizes scimark2 MonteCarlo benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #65 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #64) > I would find it extremely surprising if in > > a = b; > > the RHS doesn't constitute an access to the value of object 'b' (even > depending on the type of

[Bug inline-asm/80225] New: ICE when using =cc output operand incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80225 Bug ID: 80225 Summary: ICE when using =cc output operand incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #64

[Bug c++/77339] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cp_parser_type_name, at cp/parser.c:16532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79170] [7 regression] memcmp builtin expansion sequence can overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170 --- Comment #6 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Mon Mar 27 15:40:20 2017 New Revision: 246504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246504=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-27 Aaron Sawdey

[Bug target/79449] ppc builtin expansion of strncmp can cross page (4k) boundary where it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79449 --- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Mon Mar 27 15:40:20 2017 New Revision: 246504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246504=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-27 Aaron Sawdey

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #63 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #54) > > > > --- Comment #51 from Bernd Edlinger > > > > --- > > > > Doesn't 3.10/10 explicitly say that it is undefined to use a union to > > > > to move an

[Bug tree-optimization/80213] [7 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80213 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/80216] [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/80209] libgo test failure, dir gotest$$ not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80209 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/80092] Add effective-target keywords for unsupported nvptx features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Mar 27 15:02:21 2017 New Revision: 246503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246503=gcc=rev Log: Backport "Require effective target global_constructor for two testcases" 2017-03-27

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 80068, which changed state. Bug 80068 Summary: [Intel MPX] "internal compiler error" on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80068 What|Removed

[Bug target/80068] [Intel MPX] "internal compiler error" on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80068 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80068] [Intel MPX] "internal compiler error" on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80068 --- Comment #2 from Dmitrii Kuvaiskii --- Thanks, Martin. This patch indeed solves it.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80197] pgo dramatically pessimizes scimark2 MonteCarlo benchmark

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80197 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2) > I think that if FDO says either the true or false edge is very likely > then not if-converting the loop is best? Or is a well-predicted > conditional move as

[Bug gcov-profile/80224] New: gcov -i crashes with two arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80224 Bug ID: 80224 Summary: gcov -i crashes with two arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug gcov-profile/80223] RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Not so easy though as profiling happens after inlining.

[Bug gcov-profile/80223] RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug gcov-profile/80223] New: RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223 Bug ID: 80223 Summary: RFE: Exclude functions from profile instrumentation Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/69549] Named Address Spaces does not compile in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80170] SLP vectorization creates aligned access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80170 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0.1 --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #62 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #44) > Created attachment 41048 [details] > trial patch > > Does this fix the issue? I don't have an ARM setup handy for testing. Yes. I just tried, it and the

[Bug tree-optimization/80218] [6/7 Regression] tree-call-cdce does not update block frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/80216] [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 80217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #61 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #59) > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 > > > > --- Comment #58 from Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/80217] [7 Regression] ICE in set_ssa_name_value (deep recursion in derive_equivalencs_from_bit_ior)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80216] [7 Regression] Memory hog w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80216 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #60 from Richard Biener --- -> PR80222

[Bug middle-end/80222] may_alias folded away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80222] New: may_alias folded away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80222 Bug ID: 80222 Summary: may_alias folded away Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/80137] [6/7 Regression] std::generate_canonical calls its generator a non-constant number of times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80137 --- Comment #3 from John Salmon --- It's easy to overthink this. 0.0 is perfectly acceptable, as is any other _RealType in the range [0, 1.). But since rounding was, presumably, to-nearest or up, it's slightly disconcerting that 0.0 is neither

[Bug target/79671] [7 Regression] mapnik miscompilation on armv7hl since r235622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 --- Comment #59 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671 > > --- Comment #58 from Jonathan Wakely --- > But this seemingly equivalent code

[Bug target/24012] [5/6/7 regression] #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE breaks #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #19) > (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4) > > Historically, on some systems one had to define _POSIX_C_SOURCE to get at > > fileno(), which has been

[Bug target/24012] [5/6/7 regression] #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE breaks #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also, I assume this is only a problem for -std=c++98 or -std=gnu++98, because if the system headers don't declare those functions for C++11 and later dialects then that's a bug in those system headers.

[Bug target/24012] [5/6/7 regression] #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE breaks #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |8.0 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan

[Bug testsuite/80221] Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41057 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41057=edit tentative patch This script tries to rewrite all tests, but that's not entirely supported yet. Known error causes: -

[Bug testsuite/80221] New: Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80221 Bug ID: 80221 Summary: Contrib script to rewrite testcase from absolute to relative line numbers Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/80181] [7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 27 12:52:13 2017 New Revision: 246500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246500=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-27 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/80181] [7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- So this is another case where the conditional propagation happens so that if (a == b) { ... = deref a; ... = deref b; } turns into if (a == b) { ... = deref b; ... =

[Bug tree-optimization/80198] [6/7 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace integer operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198 --- Comment #5 from Julian Taylor --- I have been searching for a workaround as this has pretty bad performance impact in my usecase. I found that putting this into the inplace conditional #pragma GCC ivdep allows it to be vectorized again with

[Bug testsuite/80220] relative line numbers don't work when put between braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80220 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41056=edit tentative patch

[Bug tree-optimization/80218] [6/7 Regression] tree-call-cdce does not update block frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- A simple test case is: #include void f (float *x) { x[0] = sqrtf (x[0]); } which ought to spill x only when a call to sqrtf is needed.

[Bug testsuite/80220] New: relative line numbers don't work when put between braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80220 Bug ID: 80220 Summary: relative line numbers don't work when put between braces Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80068] [Intel MPX] "internal compiler error" on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80068 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/80219] New: relative line numbers only working if gcc_{error,warning}_prefix defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80219 Bug ID: 80219 Summary: relative line numbers only working if gcc_{error,warning}_prefix defined Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/80218] [6/7 Regression] tree-call-cdce does not update block frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80218 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

  1   2   >