[Bug c++/80356] [7 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:6827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80356 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80267] [7 Regression] Compiling aborts when template/auto/lambda occur in some way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80267 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80356] [7 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:6827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80356 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Apr 9 05:38:40 2017 New Revision: 246794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246794=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80356 - ICE with reference to function template argument.

[Bug c++/79294] [7 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at cp/pt.c:6812

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79294 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Apr 9 05:38:40 2017 New Revision: 246794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246794=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80356 - ICE with reference to function template argument.

[Bug c++/80373] non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80373 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80372] non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80372 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 80373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/80373] New: non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80373 Bug ID: 80373 Summary: non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/80372] New: non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80372 Bug ID: 80372 Summary: non-optimal handling of copying a std::complex Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/80267] [7 Regression] Compiling aborts when template/auto/lambda occur in some way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80267 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Apr 9 05:06:08 2017 New Revision: 246793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246793=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80267 - ICE with nested capture of reference PR c++/60992

[Bug c++/60992] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60992 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sun Apr 9 05:06:08 2017 New Revision: 246793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246793=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80267 - ICE with nested capture of reference PR c++/60992

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #11 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > If I remove the final stuff in unit_tests.f90, > > --- unit_tests_orig.f90 2017-04-08 16:16:57.0 +0200 > +++ unit_tests.f90

[Bug c++/80265] __builtin_{memcmp,memchr,strlen} are not usable in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265 --- Comment #7 from Pedro Alves --- TBH, though I do think being able to use different algorithms for compile/runtime is useful and a good idea, making the __builtin_strlen etc. builtins works OOTB would of course be great. I'm merely

[Bug c++/80265] __builtin_{memcmp,memchr,strlen} are not usable in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265 --- Comment #6 from Pedro Alves --- Hmm. I'd argue that __builtin_constant_p should return true in that case, since we're in a constexpr? In any case, changing the test like this: - if (__builtin_constant_p (s)) + if (__builtin_constant_p

[Bug rtl-optimization/70478] [LRA] S/390: Performance regression - superfluous stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70478 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Sat Apr 8 19:18:42 2017 New Revision: 246789 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246789=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-08 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug c++/80371] New: std::is_integral and std::is_floating_point fail with vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80371 Bug ID: 80371 Summary: std::is_integral and std::is_floating_point fail with vector types Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79553] [F03] Infinite gfortran loop on invalid code with dummy procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79553 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/80212] [5/6 Regression] ICE: error: comdat-local function called by virtual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80212 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|7.0 | Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/80366] [7 Regression] r246759 causes LLVM build failure: error: comdat-local function called by outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80366 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/80369] Warnings from preprocessor generated code not shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80369 --- Comment #2 from Adam Trhoň --- Could you please provide a further explanation? Why the warning in my example should not be shown? My background: We are setting up icecream (but it could be any other tool as ccache or distcc) with

[Bug c/80369] Warnings from preprocessor generated code not shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80369 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is expected behavior ...

[Bug target/80367] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 --- Comment #4 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- I fixed my code by changing the first two asm inputs to memory operands (should've done that anyway since I'm potentially modifying ds, so that could have caused issues at runtime). No longer

[Bug rtl-optimization/80358] [7 Regression] ICE (cc1 killed) building glib with -O3 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80358 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/80358] [7 Regression] ICE (cc1 killed) building glib with -O3 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80358 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Sat Apr 8 16:10:26 2017 New Revision: 246784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246784=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-08 Aaron Sawdey PR

[Bug ipa/80366] [7 Regression] r246759 causes LLVM build failure: error: comdat-local function called by outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80366 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/80369] New: Warnings from preprocessor generated code not shown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80369 Bug ID: 80369 Summary: Warnings from preprocessor generated code not shown Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- If I remove the final stuff in unit_tests.f90, --- unit_tests_orig.f90 2017-04-08 16:16:57.0 +0200 +++ unit_tests.f90 2017-04-08 16:17:20.0 +0200 @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ module

[Bug c++/70435] section attribute of a function template is not honored.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435 --- Comment #2 from Armin van der Togt --- Problem is still present in version 6.3.1

[Bug target/80367] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 --- Comment #3 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Here's an interesting observation: The ICE doesn't occur when I remove the "esp" clobber from inline asm in vbe2::set_palette() (vbe.cpp:621, vbe.ii:66207). But that's obviously not a solution

[Bug c++/80368] New: g++ thinks sizeof a non-type template parameter is dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80368 Bug ID: 80368 Summary: g++ thinks sizeof a non-type template parameter is dependent Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80367] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 --- Comment #2 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 41161 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41161=edit vbe.ii gzipped

[Bug target/80367] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80367] New: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 Bug ID: 80367 Summary: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80265] __builtin_{memcmp,memchr,strlen} are not usable in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- That doesn't work in this case: constexpr bool str() { char s[] = "str"; return ce_char_traits::length(s) == 3; } static_assert( str() ); i.e. it works OK for C++11-style constant expressions, but

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7.0.1. regression] severe |[5/6/7 Regression] bogus

[Bug fortran/67505] [F03] bogus runtime error with final subroutine and -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67505 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The change occurred between revisions r200320 (2013-06-21, no runtime error) and r200350 (2013-06-23, runtime error), likely r200321 (pr37336).

[Bug sanitizer/80348] [6/7 Regression] UBSAN: compile time crash in ubsan_instrument_division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80348 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] UBSAN: |[6/7 Regression] UBSAN:

[Bug fortran/80361] [7.0.1. regression] severe regression recursive call to nonrecursive procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of/related to pr67505? The flag -fcheck=recursion is enough to trigger the runtime error and I see it with 4.9.3, but not with 4.8.5.

[Bug c++/80363] #'vec_cond_expr' not supported by dump_expr#

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80363 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/80366] [7 Regression] r246759 causes LLVM build failure: error: comdat-local function called by outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80366 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/80366] New: [7 Regression] r246759 causes LLVM build failure: error: comdat-local function called by outside its comdat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80366 Bug ID: 80366 Summary: [7 Regression] r246759 causes LLVM build failure: error: comdat-local function called by outside its comdat Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1

[Bug fortran/80361] [7.0.1. regression] severe regression recursive call to nonrecursive procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 41159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41159=edit Correct reproducer

[Bug fortran/80361] [7.0.1. regression] severe regression recursive call to nonrecursive procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter --- Ah sorry, here is the tarball with the missing file and also the correct flags. And please remove the 'severe' from regression, I first thought this was with default flags.

[Bug middle-end/80364] [7 Regression]sanitizer detects signed integer overflow in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80364 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/80365] New: undefined memcpy while writing zero length array on unformatted stream in unix.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80365 Bug ID: 80365 Summary: undefined memcpy while writing zero length array on unformatted stream in unix.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79733] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79733 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schnetter at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/80360] internal compiler error: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80360 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/80362] gcc miscompiles arithmetic with signed char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|