https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81285
Bug ID: 81285
Summary: [8 Regression] r249888 breaks bootstrap on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
-mlong-double-128 -mno-minimal-toc -g -DIN_LIBGCC2
-fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector -fPIC -mlong-double-128
-mno-minimal-toc -I. -I. -I../.././gcc
-I/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-8.0.0_alpha20170702/work/gcc-8-20170702/libgcc
-I/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
--- Comment #4 from Alexander von Gluck ---
I mean... I know we have 32-bit x86 builds using that exact same code :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
--- Comment #3 from Alexander von Gluck ---
I may be misguided, but wouldn't it be possible to handle these in software
with some sync's and some wrapper code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-*-*
Component|plugins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
--- Comment #1 from Alexander von Gluck ---
Here is some context on our wrapper for the atomic call generating the
__atomic_fetch_add_8 references.
static __inline__ void
atomic_set64(int64* value, int64 newValue)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81283
Bug ID: 81283
Summary: Quirks around 32-bit PowerPC built-in Atomics
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69468
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81282
Bug ID: 81282
Summary: templated Lambda ,auto
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
Bug ID: 81281
Summary: UBSAN: false positive, dropped promotion to long type.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Santos ---
Thank you for the report Martin. I apologize for my slow start on this, I've
been a bit under the weather. So when I wrote the code for using aligned SSE
saves with realigned (non-DRAP) stack pointer and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81280
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81280
Bug ID: 81280
Summary: bid_conf.h:37:21: note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC
UNSPEC_GOT (0) found in variable location
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
For me the error is:
/private/var/root/gcc-git/my_oddly_named_builddir/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/private/var/root/gcc-git/my_oddly_named_builddir/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/bin/ -nostdinc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC before 7.1 had a bug where it would think all _call were template functions
while inside the template function _call. So now GCC does the correct thing
and does not think that.
So before trying calling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80751
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I am sorry, I went by memory and I swapped two digits, I have trunk 249691,
tomorrow I am downloading the latest trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57371
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 44646, which changed state.
Bug 44646 Summary: [F08] Implement DO CONCURRENT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
--- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias ---
Created attachment 41665
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41665=edit
Fixed version - also demonstrates point : addresses of members increase
So when I mangle it to actually print each
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
Jason Vas Dias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
--- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias ---
Wow! Problem SOLVED! Need a different pair of eyes sometimes ...
But I can't find where this is flagged in gcc 7.1.0 NEWS or ReleaseNotes .
It is a major change of behavior WRT to Variadic Macros, IMHO .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
--- Comment #4 from d25fe0be@ ---
'_t::_call' is a dependent name, adding 'template' before '_call' fixes the
compilation error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
Jason Vas Dias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41663|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
Jason Vas Dias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41662|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
--- Comment #1 from Jason Vas Dias ---
Obviously, G++ 5.4.0 and 6.3.0 are able to expand the
text '_HeadList...' here into the list of types:
Line 184:
_t._call< _HeadList...
But G++ 7.1.0 is not able to do so, and gives no clue
as to why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81279
Bug ID: 81279
Summary: variadic template regression : compiles without error
under 5.4.0 , with error under 7.1.0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81278
Bug ID: 81278
Summary: [8 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81277
Bug ID: 81277
Summary: assert() in multiversioned functions causes
copmilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81136
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||physiker at toast2 dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66244
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81276
Bug ID: 81276
Summary: Function multiversioning doesn't work with C++
templates
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80769
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jul 2 08:43:11 2017
New Revision: 249879
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249879=gcc=rev
Log:
PR 80769: Incorrect strlen optimisation
In this testcase, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81136
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Sun Jul 2 08:37:07 2017
New Revision: 249878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249878=gcc=rev
Log:
PR81136: ICE from inconsistent DR_MISALIGNMENTs
The test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81275
Bug ID: 81275
Summary: [gcc7 gcc8] -fsanitize=thread produce incorrect
-Wreturn-type warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80751
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81274
Bug ID: 81274
Summary: x86 optimizer emits unnecessary LEA instruction when
using AVX intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
44 matches
Mail list logo
