[Bug fortran/81723] New: [7/8 Regression] fortran build doesn't terminate on 64bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723 Bug ID: 81723 Summary: [7/8 Regression] fortran build doesn't terminate on 64bit targets Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81722] [7/8 Regression] memory hog building c++ on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81722 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-linux-gnu |i686-linux-gnu, |

[Bug c++/81722] New: [7/8 Regression] memory hog building c++ on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81722 Bug ID: 81722 Summary: [7/8 Regression] memory hog building c++ on i686-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #28 from Andy Lutomirski --- hjl, I don't understand what problem you're trying to solve here. Your patch makes it relatively straightforward to access global variables using __seg_gs if the environment sets up the %gs base exactly

[Bug target/56010] Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 James Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.d

[Bug c++/79790] [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79790] [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Aug 4 22:15:48 2017 New Revision: 250883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250883=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-08-04 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/79790] [C++17] ICE class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79790 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Aug 4 22:13:46 2017 New Revision: 250882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250882=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-08-04 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Babokin --- That's an excellent new! This means UBSAN becomes finally fully functional in GCC. No known false positives anymore (on quite large test base). Great job and thank you!

[Bug c++/69855] Missing diagnostic for overload that only differs by return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69855 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/81608] incompatible declarations of the same extern function at different scopes accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #26) > @GPREL (altough it probably should be @GPOFF by analogy with @TPOFF?) gives > the linker an option to distinguish the relocations which need to be > adjusted at

[Bug tree-optimization/57371] Simplify (double)i != 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57371 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov --- Author: ygribov Date: Fri Aug 4 20:29:12 2017 New Revision: 250877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250877=gcc=rev Log: Remove useless floating point casts in comparisons. 2017-08-04 Yury Gribov

[Bug c++/81634] Some types are incorrectly detected as not standard layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81634 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81608] incompatible declarations of the same extern function at different scopes accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81608 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See PR 69855 comment 2 - is this a dup?

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The C library sin is vectorized by being appropriately annotated with OpenMP > SIMD attributes. This isn't the case for the libstdc++ variant which ends > up

[Bug libstdc++/81482] by-value lambda capture in remove_if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81482 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to kloetzl from comment #2) > I don't think that the runtime cost of the copies is measurable. My bigger > issue is that this quirks exposes the internal behaviour of the algorithm >

[Bug c++/81674] gcc cannot detect missing initialisers for fields in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81674 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- There are several bugs about this already, please search for duplicates.

[Bug c++/81660] Add -Wexceptions warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #26 from H. Peter Anvin --- @GPREL (altough it probably should be @GPOFF by analogy with @TPOFF?) gives the linker an option to distinguish the relocations which need to be adjusted at link/load time and the ones that don't. We have

[Bug fortran/52387] I/O output of write after nonadvancing read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug fortran/44292] [libgfortran ABI breakage] Increase internal size of RECL= of the OPEN statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/81590] AVX512 run-time test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81590 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81590] AVX512 run-time test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81590 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Aug 4 17:48:57 2017 New Revision: 250875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250875=gcc=rev Log: i386: Rewrite check for AVX512 features Add a new file, avx512-check.h, to

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 --- Comment #6 from Orlando Arias --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > Bare metal target compilers should still respect the standard, which is > quite clear that dereferencing NULL is undefined. Some users of the > compiler

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu --- Comment on attachment 41920 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41920 A binutils patch This has been replaced by users/hjl/gprel/master branch at

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #20) > > Can someone elaborate on what the @GPREL suffix actually means? "%seg:foo@GPREL" is used to address symbol, foo, relative to __gp. foo is addressed by %seg +

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41920|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/81721] New: precompiled header : internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81721 Bug ID: 81721 Summary: precompiled header : internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/45599] Remove all code applying to obsolete "#pragma once"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45599 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 Orlando Arias changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81720] [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 --- Comment #1 from Orlando Arias --- Created attachment 41929 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41929=edit Compiler output with erroneous assembly listing.

[Bug target/81720] New: [arm] Invalid code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81720 Bug ID: 81720 Summary: [arm] Invalid code generation Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug hsa/81713] BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713 --- Comment #4 from visit0r at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: visit0r Date: Fri Aug 4 15:50:14 2017 New Revision: 250874 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250874=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR 81713 * brigfrontend/brig-basic-inst-handler.cc: replace

[Bug hsa/81713] BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713 --- Comment #3 from Pekka Jääskeläinen --- Committed in r250874.

[Bug c++/81719] New: Range-based for loop on short fixed size array generates long unrolled loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81719 Bug ID: 81719 Summary: Range-based for loop on short fixed size array generates long unrolled loop Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/45599] Remove all code applying to obsolete "#pragma once"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45599 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'd just go for RESOLVED INVALID. We don't want to remove the code that implements a supported feature.

[Bug c++/81668] LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/81718] New: g++ segfault when creating type alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81718 Bug ID: 81718 Summary: g++ segfault when creating type alias Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/81717] [c++ concepts] - simple "define function if not defined" code doesn't compile, no errors generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81717 --- Comment #1 from Przemysław Czechowski --- Created attachment 41926 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41926=edit Generated with g++ -save-temps ...

[Bug c++/81717] New: [c++ concepts] - simple "define function if not defined" code doesn't compile, no errors generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81717 Bug ID: 81717 Summary: [c++ concepts] - simple "define function if not defined" code doesn't compile, no errors generated Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/81716] Bogus -Wlto warning with forward-declared pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81716 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug middle-end/81698] expand_case uses wrong edge as default edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81698 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/81617] mksigtab.sh fails to resolve NSIG with glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81617 --- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Aug 4 12:29:55 2017 New Revision: 250872 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250872=gcc=rev Log: PR go/81617 libgo: change mksigtab to recognize glibc 2.26 NSIG

[Bug c/81687] Compiler drops label in OpenMP region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687 --- Comment #5 from Joachim Protze --- Jakub, thank you for the quick solution! I successfully applied your patch to the sources from 7.1 release tarball. The two test cases you added are built and linked successfully. I can also successfully

[Bug middle-end/81318] [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 --- Comment #17 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #16) > Check out the code from http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7-branch to > see if the problem exists there. From what I can see from this discussion > it

[Bug middle-end/81695] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81695 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regression]|[5/6/7 Regression] internal

[Bug middle-end/81695] [5/6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1768

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81695 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Aug 4 11:28:04 2017 New Revision: 250871 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250871=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81695 * fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): For

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 > > --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > True, but it removes the ability to avoid the vectorized variant with > using the __builtin_ variant ;) Do we ever want to generate less efficient code when

[Bug c++/81716] New: Bogus -Wlto warning with forward-declared pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81716 Bug ID: 81716 Summary: Bogus -Wlto warning with forward-declared pointers Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- > The C/C++ FE change would be something like:

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- The C/C++ FE change would be something like: --- gcc/tree.c.jj 2017-07-29 09:48:40.0 +0200 +++ gcc/tree.c 2017-08-04 12:06:35.636072718 +0200 @@ -5022,8 +5022,8 @@ attribute_value_equal

[Bug tree-optimization/81136] [8 Regression] ICE: in vect_update_misalignment_for_peel, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:910

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81136 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Fri Aug 4 10:42:53 2017 New Revision: 250870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250870=gcc=rev Log: Pool alignment information for common bases This patch is a

[Bug hsa/81713] BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713 --- Comment #2 from Pekka Jääskeläinen --- https://github.com/linehill/gccbrig/commit/feab8a56be8cbe3b95f4dd121e7db4306f75655e.patch I will commit this a bit later unless you wish to fix it sooner.

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41923 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41923=edit gcc8-pr81706.patch The reason for why cmath does this is that C++ wants to have sin overloads. And the problem is

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 4 10:33:39 2017 New Revision: 250866 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250866=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-04 Richard Biener PR middle-end/81705

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81715] New: asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 Bug ID: 81715 Summary: asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81668] LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/81668] LTO ODR warnings are not helpful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81668 --- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com --- Running with -fno-diagnostics-show-caret does not help any: ../include/violite.h:288:8: warning: type ‘struct st_vio’ violates the C++ One Definition Rule [-Wodr] ../include/violite.h:288:0:

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/81714] New: incorrect location for uninitialised variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81714 Bug ID: 81714 Summary: incorrect location for uninitialised variable Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug hsa/81713] BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pekka.jaaskelainen@parmance

[Bug hsa/81713] New: BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81713 Bug ID: 81713 Summary: BIT_FIELD_REF produced by Brig FE do not pass new verification Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/81697] Incorrect ASan global variables alignment on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com ---

[Bug bootstrap/81710] build fail with glibc 2.26 due to removing ucontext/sigaltstack struct tags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81710 Petr Ovtchenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41921|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41923 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41923=edit gcc8-pr81706.patch The reason for why cmath does this is that C++ wants to have sin overloads. And the problem is

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Oops. Simple mistake in my recent patch. Index: gcc/fold-const.c === --- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 250865) +++ gcc/fold-const.c

[Bug bootstrap/81710] build fail with glibc 2.26 due to removing ucontext/sigaltstack struct tags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81710 Petr Ovtchenkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/81705] [8 Regression] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/81710] build fail with glibc 2.26 due to removing ucontext/sigaltstack struct tags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81710 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/81712] gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/81706] std::sin vectorization bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/81704] strncpy folding defeats strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81704 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81703] memcpy folding defeats strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/81712] gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 --- Comment #3 from Igor Chubin --- Perfect. I'll try to build gcc-7.2-RC-20170802

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/81701] -fstack-arrays hehavior does not match documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81701 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation --- Comment #1 from

[Bug middle-end/81698] expand_case uses wrong edge as default edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81698 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug testsuite/81699] [8 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-23.c fails starting with r250853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81699 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81066] sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abominable-snowman at yandex dot r

[Bug sanitizer/81711] __res_state is a struct and a function in glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81711 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81705] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I don't see this with g++-7 which has (void) (a = (-516151698 - NON_LVALUE_EXPR ) - -NON_LVALUE_EXPR ) trunks produces (void) (a = -516151698 - (-NON_LVALUE_EXPR + NON_LVALUE_EXPR ))

[Bug other/81712] gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 --- Comment #2 from Igor Chubin --- Perfect. I'll try to build gcc-7.2-RC-20170802

[Bug other/81712] gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This might already be fixed for 7.2.0.

[Bug bootstrap/81711] __res_state is a struct and a function in glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81711 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 41922 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41922 patch to fix This patch should go upstream first. Note gcc 7.2 is about to release in a few weeks so it might already

[Bug other/81712] New: gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712 Bug ID: 81712 Summary: gcc does not compile when using glib 2.26 (everything works fine with 2.25) Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/81705] UBSAN: yet another false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81705 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81711] New: __res_state is a struct and a function in glibc 2.26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81711 Bug ID: 81711 Summary: __res_state is a struct and a function in glibc 2.26 Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81702] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81710] New: build fail with glibc 2.26 due to removing ucontext/sigaltstack struct tags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81710 Bug ID: 81710 Summary: build fail with glibc 2.26 due to removing ucontext/sigaltstack struct tags Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: