[Bug bootstrap/82037] powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu bootstrap breaks in stage2 with gcc/liblto_plugin.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82037 --- Comment #6 from Dennis Clarke --- Well that change fails in stage 1 : /usr/local/build/gcc-7.2.0_linux_3.16.0-4-powerpc64.003/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/build/gcc-7.2.0_linux_3.16.0-4-powerpc64.003/./gcc/

[Bug c++/81932] Template arguments of type unsigned generate incorrect debugging information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 --- Comment #25 from Paul Smith --- > (1) Find the mangled name of the vtable of tv. > (2) Demangle the name, to be 'vtable for TreeVector::Tree'. > (3) Skip 'vtable for ' and get 'TreeVector::Tree'. > (4) Lookup this symbol.

[Bug c/82068] New: wrong double to uint64_t conversion with -mieee

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82068 Bug ID: 82068 Summary: wrong double to uint64_t conversion with -mieee Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/81874] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:725

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81874 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/82037] powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu bootstrap breaks in stage2 with gcc/liblto_plugin.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82037 --- Comment #5 from Dennis Clarke --- ppc64$ pwd /usr/local/build/gcc-7.2.0_linux_3.16.0-4-powerpc64.003 ppc64$ date Fri Sep 1 03:01:16 GMT 2017 ppc64$ ../gcc-7.2.0/configure --build=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu \ >

[Bug c++/82067] New: G++ has an internal compiler error in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82067 Bug ID: 82067 Summary: G++ has an internal compiler error in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1557 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4

[Bug target/82066] #pragma GCC target documentation does not say it is implemented for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82066 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Also the documentation for the target attribute does not point to the aarch64 documentation (it does point to the arm one though): The options supported are specific to each target; refer to x86 Function

[Bug target/82066] New: #pragma GCC target documentation does not say it is implemented for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82066 Bug ID: 82066 Summary: #pragma GCC target documentation does not say it is implemented for aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 42098 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42098=edit first cut of fix Here's the patch I'm testing. Only sanity-checked on aarch64-linux-gnu and cross

[Bug c/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 --- Comment #2 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org --- On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:32 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This is already possible: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Option-properties.html > >

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #6) [...] > Ah! Thanks for debugging it. I guess the problem is that we're > passing the new machine_mode classes through ...

[Bug fortran/82065] New: gfortran rejects redundant use of intrinsic module constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82065 Bug ID: 82065 Summary: gfortran rejects redundant use of intrinsic module constant Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81512] duplicate note in -Walloca-larger-than and alloca in a return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81512 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #35 from Andreas K. Huettel --- Oops sorry, that should have been: According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629342 *not* fixed for gcc-6.

[Bug c++/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org ---

[Bug c++/65324] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: incorrect location for function templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81504] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7 regression: vec_st in loop misoptimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81504] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7 regression: vec_st in loop misoptimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Aug 31 20:28:17 2017 New Revision: 251575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251575=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-31 Bill Schmidt Backport from

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/81942] ICE on empty constexpr constructor with C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81942 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jose.marchesi at oracle dot com ---

[Bug c++/81942] ICE on empty constexpr constructor with C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81942 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Such labels are special: they are DECL_ARTIFICIAL and are created by create_artificial_label called by start_preparsed_function.

[Bug bootstrap/81926] go/parse.o differs between stage2 and stage3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926 --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou --- OK, I can reproduce with BUILD_CONFIG set to empty: Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/go/parse.o differs make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 $ grep BUILD_CONFIG config.log

[Bug c++/81942] ICE on empty constexpr constructor with C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81942 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Adding more details. The GOTO_EXPR is generated for such targets in finish_return_stmt: 903 if (DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (current_function_decl) 904 || (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (current_function_decl)

[Bug tree-optimization/82060] [7/8 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1 with devirtualization enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82060 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug fortran/82064] [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064 --- Comment #1 from Daan van Vugt --- the !use mod_boris should be !use mod_f to work around the problem in the attachment and code below

[Bug fortran/82064] New: [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064 Bug ID: 82064 Summary: [OOP] multiple incompatible definitions of extended derived type via module use Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/82063] New: issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 Bug ID: 82063 Summary: issues with arguments enabled by -Wall Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug middle-end/82062] New: [8 regression] simple conditional expressions no longer folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82062 Bug ID: 82062 Summary: [8 regression] simple conditional expressions no longer folded Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 --- Comment #7 from Louis Dionne --- Then, I think there's another bug in GCC (or maybe just a QOI issue), since the following code compiles (wandbox[1]): template constexpr T v; template constexpr T v(888); struct S { constexpr

[Bug other/82061] -Wall documentation needs updating

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82061 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug libstdc++/21549] Configure options hard to find

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think it does mandate that. I think I was wrong to say (in comment 1) that it's only a declaration. I believe it's a definition too.

[Bug other/82061] New: -Wall documentation needs updating

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82061 Bug ID: 82061 Summary: -Wall documentation needs updating Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 Louis Dionne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/82039] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant triggers when calling std::allocate<...>::allocate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Aug 31 16:45:37 2017 New Revision: 251570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251570=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82039 suppress -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warning PR

[Bug middle-end/82051] [mips]mips emit different results when compiling union var using -O0/-O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82051 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, zwzhangwen.zhang at huawei dot com wrote: >volatile long long f1; > printf ("g_121.f1=%x\n",g_121.f1); In addition to the other points people have made about

[Bug c++/82029] [8 Regression] bogus error: ‘__PRETTY_FUNCTION__’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82029 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82029] [8 Regression] bogus error: ‘__PRETTY_FUNCTION__’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82029 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 31 15:39:04 2017 New Revision: 251567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251567=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82029 - __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in lambda in template * pt.c

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Because std::complex has a default constructor that initializes all its members. If you replace S with a type that leaves some members uninitialized when default-initialized, it fails: template struct S

[Bug sanitizer/82046] [7/8 Regression] Bogus -fsanitize=undefined error with -O2 -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82046 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 --- Comment #3 from John McFarlane --- This still happens when S has member variables. For example, if `S` is replaced with `std::complex`, then `v` is `{0,0}`.

[Bug fortran/82055] segfault compiling F2003 functionality: 4.9.3, 5.3.0 and 6.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82055 --- Comment #2 from Will Sawyer --- Created attachment 42096 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42096=edit src and build directories with code to isolate bug

[Bug libstdc++/80335] perf of copying std::optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80335 sgunderson at bigfoot dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgunderson at bigfoot dot

[Bug tree-optimization/82060] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1 with devirtualization enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82060 Bug ID: 82060 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1 with devirtualization enabled Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/54568] --eh-frame-hdr should also be enabled for static executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81860] [7/8 Regression] Call to undefined inline function involving inheriting constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- tmp$ g++ test-case3.cpp -c && nm test-case3.o U _ZN1AIjEC1Ev W _ZN1BC1IiEET_RK1AIjE W _ZN1BC2IiEET_RK1AIjE n _ZN1BC5IiEET_RK1AIjE

[Bug c++/81860] [7/8 Regression] Call to undefined inline function involving inheriting constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/82057] ICE with -fgraphite-identity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82057 --- Comment #1 from Sven C. Dack --- Now with the update it looks much like it's a duplicate of 81226 and 80069. I did a search before posting this bug, but couldn't find anything close to it. Sorry if I'm reporting the same issue here.

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- >> --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > gnu.org> --- > [...] >>> Natively, I can easily reproduce the ICE with >>> >>> $ cc1 -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i -quiet -mcpu=v9 -o

[Bug tree-optimization/82059] New: [8 Regression] ICE in dump_profile, at gimple-pretty-print.c:89

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82059 Bug ID: 82059 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in dump_profile, at gimple-pretty-print.c:89 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/82059] [8 Regression] ICE in dump_profile, at gimple-pretty-print.c:89

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82059 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-8-31 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/82058] ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2954 (after adding early clobber in .md)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82058 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > At r251537, with this patch: > ... > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md > index d61afcf..a42358d 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md >

[Bug rtl-optimization/82058] ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2954 (after adding early clobber in .md)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82058 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 42094 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42094=edit workaround patch Using this workaround patch, we have instead: ... 0 Early clobber: reject++ 3

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82058] New: ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2954 (after adding early clobber in .md)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82058 Bug ID: 82058 Summary: ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:2954 (after adding early clobber in .md) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 31 11:21:40 2017 New Revision: 251560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251560=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-31 Richard Biener PR lto/81968 *

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 31 11:20:54 2017 New Revision: 251559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251559=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-31 Richard Biener PR middle-end/82054

[Bug target/81709] __attribute__((interrupt)) should handle SSE registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81709 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Anatol from comment #6) > > I don't believe compiler needs to do all that. > > I might miss something, could you please share why? > > The check for FXSAVE can be a compile time: if compiled for

[Bug c++/81942] ICE on empty constexpr constructor with C++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81942 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/65324] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: incorrect location for function templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/65324] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: incorrect location for function templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||max at maxbruckner dot de --- Comment

[Bug c++/82039] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant triggers when calling std::allocate<...>::allocate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65324] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: incorrect location for function templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65324 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/82039] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant triggers when calling std::allocate<...>::allocate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Minimal testcase for the front-end bug: template void f(void* = 0) { } int main() { f(); } loc.cc: In function 'void f(void*) [with T = int]': loc.cc:4:10: warning: zero as null pointer constant

[Bug rtl-optimization/82057] New: ICE with -fgraphite-identity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82057 Bug ID: 82057 Summary: ICE with -fgraphite-identity Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug c++/82039] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant triggers when calling std::allocate<...>::allocate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82056] Automatic array can be sized via allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82056 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/82049] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with character(*),parameter array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82049 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/82056] New: Automatic array can be sized via allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82056 Bug ID: 82056 Summary: Automatic array can be sized via allocatable array Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Actually I wonder if this is due to GCC implementing a solution for http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#253 The relevant rule is: "A constexpr specifier used in an object

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 > > --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > On LTO tescases or on others?

[Bug c++/82047] non-existent variable template used to initialize variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82047 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > On LTO tescases or on others? LTO is expected to fail in weird ways > until simple object support for mach-o is implemented. My gfortran tests run the additional options -g -flto. The dsymutil

[Bug fortran/82055] segfault compiling F2003 functionality: 4.9.3, 5.3.0 and 6.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82055 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82040] [7/8 Regression] ICE with -Wbool-operation and ~

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82040 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3 Summary|ICE with

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> --- [...] >> Natively, I can easily reproduce the ICE with >> >> $ cc1 -fpreprocessed libgcc2.i -quiet -mcpu=v9 -o libgcc2.s

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Hmpf, that DW_AT_object_pointer thing is tricky ;) Ah... first generated by #6 0x0101629a in expand_omp_taskreg (region=0x2c19ab0) at /tmp/trunk2/gcc/omp-expand.c:1313 1313

[Bug fortran/82055] New: segfault compiling F2003 functionality: 4.9.3, 5.3.0 and 6.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82055 Bug ID: 82055 Summary: segfault compiling F2003 functionality: 4.9.3, 5.3.0 and 6.3.0 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/81923] [ASAN] gcc emites wrong odr asan instrumentation for glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923 --- Comment #8 from Denis Khalikov --- Works for me. Thanks.

[Bug c++/82053] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82053 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug middle-end/82051] [mips]mips emit different results when compiling union var using -O0/-O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3) > > --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > gnu.org> --- > > Could you attach the .i file? Using a cross compiler, I was

[Bug c/82050] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in column_range, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82050 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/82048] [7 Regression] GCC bootstrap fails in stage1 on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82048 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3

[Bug sanitizer/82046] [7/8 Regression] Bogus -fsanitize=undefined error with -O2 -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82046 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3

[Bug sanitizer/82046] [7/8 Regression] Bogus -fsanitize=undefined error with -O2 -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82046 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I suppose fancy threading gets in the way... [84.09%]: # p_4 = PHI if (p_4 == 0B) goto ; [0.04%] else goto ; [99.96%] [0.03%]: __builtin___ubsan_handle_nonnull_arg

[Bug sanitizer/82046] [7/8 Regression] Bogus -fsanitize=undefined error with -O2 -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82046 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org gnu.org> --- > Could you attach the .i file? Using a cross compiler, I was able to build the Sure, done. > parts of libgcc that

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: class a { bool b (); }; bool a::b () { #pragma omp parallel ; }

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug bootstrap/82045] [8 regression] SPARC bootstrap broken: ICE in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4565

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 42091 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42091=edit preprocessed input

[Bug c++/82040] ICE with -Wbool-operation and ~

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82040 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/82054] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82054] ice in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp and -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice in add_dwarf_attr with |ice in add_dwarf_attr with

[Bug c/82050] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in column_range, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82050 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9) > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > > > --- Comment #8 from ro at

[Bug tree-optimization/82052] [8 Regression] ICE with "-O3 -m32" on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in pop_to_marker, at tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:71)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82052 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82054] New: ice in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82054 Bug ID: 82054 Summary: ice in add_dwarf_attr with -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

  1   2   >