https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82103
Bug ID: 82103
Summary: spurious stringop-overflow warning
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28582
Roland Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rol...@johnsmith-book.com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu ---
By definition of the "naked" attribute, the program is responsible
to manage stack. Since simulated interrupt functions don't follow
the normal software calling convention and there is no attempt
made to accommod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 42120
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42120&action=edit
Another testcase to show the issue on Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 42119
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42119&action=edit
A testcase to show the issue on Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82102
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|x86_64-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82102
Bug ID: 82102
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in
/home/arnd/git/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4863
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82045
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82101
Bug ID: 82101
Summary: Uninitialized variable detection failed with variables
in for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #8 from Manuel Lóp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82100
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Sep 4 18:28:20 2017
New Revision: 251682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82098
* config/i386/i386.md (*_mask): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26461
cbcode at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cbcode at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
The patch from comment fixes all instances for me, in nine distinct source
files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82100
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code for Wunreachable-code was removed a long time ago (around 5-10 years
ago).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82100
Bug ID: 82100
Summary: gcc cannot detect unreachable code even when
-Wunreachable-code is in effect
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |5.5
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for all active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 17:09:05 2017
New Revision: 251680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 17:09:05 2017
New Revision: 251680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 17:09:01 2017
New Revision: 251679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/53984 handle exceptions in basic_istream::sentry
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 17:08:56 2017
New Revision: 251678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81017 add noexcept to std::function move operations
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54447
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:52:30 2017
New Revision: 251676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:52:25 2017
New Revision: 251675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/53984 handle exceptions in basic_istream::sentry
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81751
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:52:30 2017
New Revision: 251676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251676&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81751 don't call fflush(NULL)
Backport from mainline
2017-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81017
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:52:20 2017
New Revision: 251674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81017 add noexcept to std::function move operations
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On September 4, 2017 5:51:13 PM GMT+02:00, "manu at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
>
>Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly adjusted testcase that better matches what the original had:
template
void bar (T &x, T &y, U u)
{
u (x, y);
}
template
void baz (T &x, T &y) noexcept (noexcept (x == y));
void
foo (int x, int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:41:38 2017
New Revision: 251672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82039 suppress -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warning
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81599
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:41:29 2017
New Revision: 251670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81599 fix typo in Doxygen comments
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:41:34 2017
New Revision: 251671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81891 fix double-free in hashtable constructor
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81338
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:41:25 2017
New Revision: 251669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81338 correctly manage string capacity
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81988
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I've attached a reduced testcase which fails on GCC 7 and 8 with the same
> kind of error. This issue is an STD instruction which tries to store an odd
> numbered register which is not allowed:
Can you als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:17:07 2017
New Revision: 251667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81891 fix double-free in hashtable constructor
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81599
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:17:03 2017
New Revision: 251666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81599 fix typo in Doxygen comments
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:17:11 2017
New Revision: 251668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82039 suppress -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warning
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81338
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 16:16:58 2017
New Revision: 251665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81338 correctly manage string capacity
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 15:48:47 2017
New Revision: 251664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79162 implement LWG 2946 and LWG 2758
2017-09-04 Daniel K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov ---
This is the actual guilty line:
sw_absorption.F90:chlamnt = 10**(logchl)
It computes 'chlamnt' and then compares it to the list of acceptable values.
When -Ofast is enabled, CPU2017::628 considers 'chla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Okay, finally I`ve got a minimal reproducer.
All this miscompare boils down to the following:
program r628
real(8) :: l = -3
print *, merge("PASSED", "FAILED", 1D-3 .le. 10**l)
end program r628
Normally, 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
--- Comment #1 from Björn Schäpers ---
Created attachment 42117
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42117&action=edit
The preprocessed test file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099
Bug ID: 82099
Summary: internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at
cp/except.c:1186 when using a function pointer for
templated predicate
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308
--- Comment #64 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Sep 4 15:25:59 2017
New Revision: 251663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR target/77308
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42115
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42115&action=edit
gcc8-pr81979.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpcspe-*-linux-gnu* |powerpc-*-linux-gnu*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 4 14:10:11 2017
New Revision: 251661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82084
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81783
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 4 14:05:01 2017
New Revision: 251660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/81783
* c-warn.c (warn_tautological_bitwise_compar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Sep 4 14:00:29 2017
New Revision: 251659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-03 Jeff Law
PR tree-optimization/64910
* tree-s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81912
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82072
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm not sure if it even makes a difference, but I've added the check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82072
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #13)
> So maybe
>
> --- a/gcc/convert.c
> +++ b/gcc/convert.c
> @@ -886,6 +886,10 @@ convert_to_integer_1 (tree type, tree expr, bool dofold)
> break;
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82098
Bug ID: 82098
Summary: [8 regression] internal compiler error: in
elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3616,
-march=i686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82072
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
So maybe
--- a/gcc/convert.c
+++ b/gcc/convert.c
@@ -886,6 +886,10 @@ convert_to_integer_1 (tree type, tree expr, bool dofold)
break;
case NEGATE_EXPR:
+ /* Using unsigned arithmetic ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82072
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #10)
> A related issue is the following:
>
> /* UB sanitizer should detect undefined negation of LLONG_MIN */
> /* must be compiled with -fsanitize=undefined and run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81891
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 12:24:42 2017
New Revision: 251654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251654&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81891 fix double-free in hashtable constructor
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81912
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 12:24:53 2017
New Revision: 251657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81912 make std::__iterator_category constexpr
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81599
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 12:24:37 2017
New Revision: 251653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81599 fix typo in Doxygen comments
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82039
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 12:24:57 2017
New Revision: 251658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82039 suppress -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant warning
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81338
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 4 12:24:33 2017
New Revision: 251652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/81338 correctly manage string capacity
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82072
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 4 11:30:26 2017
New Revision: 251651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/82072
* convert.c (do_narrow): When sanit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, we could simply reject STRING_CSTs in vectorizable_store:
Index: gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c (revision 2515
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82084
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 42113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42113&action=edit
patch for native_encode_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82060
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 4 10:57:20 2017
New Revision: 251650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-04 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82060
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82083
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82095
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42112&action=edit
gcc8-pr82095.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82097
Bug ID: 82097
Summary: Invalid warning: declaration enum does not declare
anything
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67458
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67458
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Mon Sep 4 10:16:37 2017
New Revision: 251643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
optabs: ensure atomic_load/stores have compiler barriers
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Mon Sep 4 10:16:37 2017
New Revision: 251643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
optabs: ensure atomic_load/stores have compiler barriers
P
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
