https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82080
--- Comment #4 from James Almer ---
The regression seems to have started with revision r251433.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168
--- Comment #3 from physiker at toast2 dot net ---
I appologize if this is a bogus bug report. ifort version 17 accepts the code,
bug2.f90, though.
$ ifort -v
ifort version 17.0.0
$ ifort -o bug2 bug2.f90 -warn all
bug2.f90(18): remark #7712:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
LR and CTR together are a register class -- they both can be used as jump
target, in the same way. Converting LR to be a fixed register is not going
to be trivial, either.
But, where does it come from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Mon Sep 11 21:53:38 2017
New Revision: 251990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251990=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/82181
2017-09-11 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Mon Sep 11 21:49:34 2017
New Revision: 251989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251989=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/82181
2017-09-11 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 11 21:47:41 2017
New Revision: 251988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251988=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70483 make std::string_view fully constexpr
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #4 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Mon Sep 11 21:44:42 2017
New Revision: 251987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251987=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/82181
2017-09-11 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #3 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Mon Sep 11 21:33:36 2017
New Revision: 251986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251986=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: fix PR target/82181
2017-09-11 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.sandiford at linaro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82167
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185
Bug ID: 82185
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault in expand_binop
gcc/optabs.c:1137
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The documentation explicitly says -Wpedantic includes some warnings about
things outside of ISO C, beyond those that violate syntax rules or
constraints. (Sometimes this only applies in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69285
nils changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nilsgcc at shkoo dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
>> (gdb) p reg_renumber[564]
>> $1 = 65
>
> 65 is LR. What.
Heh, I was thinking the same thing. Seriously,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #2 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With the current gcc mainline compiling the reproducer source results in
different ICE:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c: In function ‘expire_timeout_chk’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
> I don't think my patch is the cause of the problem, more like it just
> exposed more problems in the SPE code. After RA, we call into LRA to spill
> a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184
Bug ID: 82184
Summary: [8 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000
miscompares
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81922
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81929
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500
--- Comment #16 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Mon Sep 11 19:02:34 2017
New Revision: 251982
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251982=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/71500
* include/bits/regex_executor.tcc: Support icase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81971
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82023
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82183
Bug ID: 82183
Summary: gcc.dg/sancov/cmp0.c fails on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81272
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81631
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82167
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81536
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82171
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81474
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
--- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue happens in the splitter movdi_internal in the call chain
xtensa_split_operand_pair -> adjust_address_1 -> change_address_1, in line
gcc_assert (memory_address_addr_space_p (mode, addr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82182
Bug ID: 82182
Summary: m68k slow code: u16/u8 division calls divsi3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81379
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81397
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82181
Bug ID: 82181
Summary: internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at
emit-rtl.c:2126
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81429
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
--- Comment #2 from f.hollerer at gmx dot net ---
> See PR 42579 which has a patch to add __FILE_BASENAME__ for this purpose.
Unfortunately this does not solve the problem when __FILE__ is used indirectly
via the assert() macro shipped with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Please send patches to the gcc-patches mailing list for review. Patches in
bugzilla are easily overlooked or forgotten.
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82158
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Falling off a noreturn function sounds like it could be another case to
insert __builtin_trap (), as we do in various cases of undefined behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #3 from Nuno Lopes ---
Sorry, I forgot to include the code for b.c:
void f(int*x, int*y) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
I don't think my patch is the cause of the problem, more like it just exposed
more problems in the SPE code. After RA, we call into LRA to spill a pseudo
that did not get allocated a register:
Breakpoint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82179
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170911 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82180
Bug ID: 82180
Summary: assign_spill_hard_regs spills to unaligned register
pair
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #4)
> since I cannot change the Assignee field, in order to avoid redundant work:
> I am currently studying this bug and try to fix it.
Tamar is already working on it and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82179
--- Comment #2 from Federico Bento ---
I pressed enter before entering a description, so the actual description is
comment 1. Sorry for that.
Federico Bento.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82179
--- Comment #1 from Federico Bento ---
Hello,
This a request for an exploit mitigation to be added to the compiler, possibly
when making use of FORTIFY_SOURCE.
Something like the below, but at the compiler level:
#define SAFE_FREE(x) do {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82179
Bug ID: 82179
Summary: Use-after-free / double-free exploit mitigation
request
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81800
--- Comment #4 from Qing Zhao ---
since I cannot change the Assignee field, in order to avoid redundant work:
I am currently studying this bug and try to fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82178
Bug ID: 82178
Summary: bootstrap fails on ppc64 for
--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #2 from Nuno Lopes ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't see how this can ever be defined code.
>
> By definition yi will never be equal to pi unless by accident.
Sure, that's ok, but then pi = , and so the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see how this can ever be defined code.
By definition yi will never be equal to pi unless by accident.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177
Bug ID: 82177
Summary: Alias analysis too aggressive with integer-to-pointer
cast
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #39 from Matt Thompson ---
Thanks! I'll keep an eye out for this in an upcoming release so I can test with
GEOS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81525
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 42155
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42155=edit
Rejects-valid testcase
This rather complex testcase was auto-reduced and provided on IRC. It fails
with current
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have been able to bootstrap with the commit for ada/sem_ch7.adb reverted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81432
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82176
Bug ID: 82176
Summary: Feature request: replace __FILE__ with file's basename
instead its full name
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82154
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
And as it's started with my patch (r251690), it's really mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Sep 11 10:44:11 2017
New Revision: 251975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251975=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/81852 define feature-test macro for -fthreadsafe-statics
gcc/c-family:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Nathan mentioned today that we have the inverse problem as well: after we've
captured i, we should still be able to use its constant value. Here's an
example of things that ought to work and mostly don't:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Roberts ---
This also fails on a Raspberry PI 3 running armv7 in the same way.
Looks like the armv8 code has got mixed up with the armv7 code...
The RPI3 has:
4x ARM Cortex-A53 rev 4 (0x4100d030)
cat /proc/cpuinfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82119
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82119
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Sep 11 09:09:26 2017
New Revision: 251964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251964=gcc=rev
Log:
Make HSA resilient to side-effects of split_edge
2017-09-11 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
Bug ID: 82175
Summary: -march=native fails on armv7 big/little system
armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf with gcc 8.0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174
Bug ID: 82174
Summary: Null name in one entry of the builtin_data array of
jit-builtins.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82044
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug ID: 82173
Summary: [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
/home/ma/m/build/for_cross --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-shared --enable-fully-dynamic-string
--prefix=/home/ma/m/cross --with-sysroot=/home/ma/m/cross
Thread model: win32
gcc version 8.0.0 20170911 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-share
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 82057, which changed state.
Bug 82057 Summary: ICE with -fgraphite-identity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82057
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sven.c.dack at sky dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 81226, which changed state.
Bug 81226 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Graphite ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at
graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81226
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
