[Bug c++/82069] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamrial at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/82080] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82080 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/82069] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||darpeer at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/82198] clang compile fails with g++ 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82198 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/82198] New: clang compile fails with g++ 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82198 Bug ID: 82198 Summary: clang compile fails with g++ 8 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/82197] Default flags enabled by GCC at -O3 by default appear to be out of sync with the GCC documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197 --- Comment #2 from Shane Peelar --- Oops, you're right! That didn't even occur to me that the link I was using was GCC trunk--I assumed it was the latest release. Thanks! We can close this.

[Bug tree-optimization/82197] Default flags enabled by GCC at -O3 by default appear to be out of sync with the GCC documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/82197] New: Default flags enabled by GCC at -O3 by default appear to be out of sync with the GCC documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82197 Bug ID: 82197 Summary: Default flags enabled by GCC at -O3 by default appear to be out of sync with the GCC documentation Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/82196] New: -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196 Bug ID: 82196 Summary: -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/81833] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC: VSX: Miscompiles ffmpeg's scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81833] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC: VSX: Miscompiles ffmpeg's scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Sep 12 21:07:30 2017 New Revision: 252044 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252044=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt Backport

[Bug target/81833] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC: VSX: Miscompiles ffmpeg's scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Sep 12 21:03:42 2017 New Revision: 252043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252043=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt Backport

[Bug target/81833] [7/8 Regression] PowerPC: VSX: Miscompiles ffmpeg's scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Sep 12 21:02:13 2017 New Revision: 252042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252042=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-09-12 Bill Schmidt Backport

[Bug c++/82195] New: Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 Bug ID: 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug libgomp/82194] Mapping array section (e.g. [0:N-1]) using omp target map crashes at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82194 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/82194] New: Mapping array section (e.g. [0:N-1]) using omp target map crashes at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82194 Bug ID: 82194 Summary: Mapping array section (e.g. [0:N-1]) using omp target map crashes at runtime Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/82136] x86: -mavx256-split-unaligned-load should try to fold other shuffles into the load/vinsertf128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82136 --- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > And it gets worse because of the splitting > which isn't exposed to the vectorizer. Split loads/stores can be a useful shuffling strategy even on

[Bug bootstrap/81315] powerpc64 vs building lang/gcc7-devel (on FreeBSD head): xgcc gets segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315 --- Comment #2 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Any chance to reproduce with a cross compiler on Linux? I assume that amd64 as a host is implicit in this request. It is less clear if the target is intended as

[Bug c++/70621] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[6/7 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/70621] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Sep 12 19:45:37 2017 New Revision: 252040 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252040=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-09-12 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/82193] incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x};

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69249] Array-boundary offending code is silently discarded without warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249 Arnd Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arnd at linaro dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/82193] incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x};

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #2) > Basically: because the other two compilers compile it. Again so ...

[Bug c++/82193] incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x};

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193 --- Comment #2 from Marc Mutz --- Basically: because the other two compilers compile it.

[Bug c++/82193] incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x};

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Why do you think this is a bug in GCC? The "changes meaning of" is a diagnostic which is not required by C++. That is the C++ language says this is invalid code but a diagnostic is not required.

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] [5/6/7/8 Regression] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > emit instead a left shift by -12 and right shift by 19 instead of left shift > by 31. Instead of right shift by 31 obviously.

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] [5/6/7/8 Regression] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, the shift count is computed in the end in QImode and we have essentially (unsigned char)(((unsigned char) a) | 0xf7) + 0x28) as the shift count. The only two results of that, whatever a is, are 0x1f or

[Bug tree-optimization/82137] auto-vectorizing shuffles way to much to avoid duplicate work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82137 --- Comment #2 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Interesting idea. It's probably a bit hard to make the vectorizer do this > though given it's current structure and the fact that it would have to > cost the

[Bug c++/82193] New: incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x};

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82193 Bug ID: 82193 Summary: incorrectly rejects int x; struct { decltype(x) x; } f = {x}; Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017 New Revision: 252039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82173 PR

[Bug fortran/82168] Parameterized Derived Types, problems with default type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82168 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 12 18:06:52 2017 New Revision: 252039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252039=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82173 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] [5/6/7/8 Regression] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82112] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- Thank you very much Jakub.

[Bug target/82185] ICE: Segmentation fault in expand_binop gcc/optabs.c:1137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185 --- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Can't reproduce with x86_64-linux-gnu cross compiler: > > ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib > --disable-libsanitizer

[Bug c/80942] -Woverlength-strings should no longer be implied by -Wpedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > > --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre --- > > This is not what is documented: > > > > Issue all the warnings demanded by strict ISO C and ISO

[Bug other/81096] [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fails starting with its introduction in r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 --- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Tue Sep 12 17:00:00 2017 New Revision: 252038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252038=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Steve Ellcey PR other/81096 *

[Bug sanitizer/82116] "nested bug in the same thread" when a bug is found while reporting another one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82116 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #4 from Vsevolod Livinskiy --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru wrote: > > > struct struct_t { > > unsigned int memb : 13; > > }; > > > > extern

[Bug driver/81498] Support creating static PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/81096] [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fails starting with its introduction in r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 --- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Tue Sep 12 16:33:31 2017 New Revision: 252035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252035=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Steve Ellcey PR other/81096 *

[Bug target/81325] -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42160=edit gcc8-pr81325.patch Untested fix.

[Bug driver/81498] Support creating static PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81498 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Sep 12 16:30:28 2017 New Revision: 252034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252034=gcc=rev Log: Add -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE This patch adds

[Bug libstdc++/70483] string_view::compare and coparision operators are not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70483] string_view::compare and coparision operators are not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:09 2017 New Revision: 252031 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252031=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70483 make std::string_view fully constexpr Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/70483] string_view::compare and coparision operators are not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:14 2017 New Revision: 252032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252032=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr Backport

[Bug c++/80265] __builtin_{memcmp,memchr,strlen} are not usable in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 16:27:01 2017 New Revision: 252030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252030=gcc=rev Log: Finish implementing P0426R1 "Constexpr for std::char_traits" for C++17 As

[Bug libstdc++/80704] Error while invoking `string_view::string_view(const char*)` in a `constexpr` context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80704 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |7.3 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug target/81422] [aarch64] internal compiler error: in update_equiv_regs, at ira.c:3425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81422 Qing Zhao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vsevolod.livinskij at frtk dot ru wrote: > struct struct_t { > unsigned int memb : 13; > }; > > extern struct_t b; > printf("%llu\n", b.memb); unsigned int :

[Bug c/80942] -Woverlength-strings should no longer be implied by -Wpedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942 > > --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre --- > (In reply to

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #2 from Vsevolod Livinskiy --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does -fsantize=undefined show anything? > > I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift. Test doesn't contain undefined

[Bug target/80204] macosx-version-min wrong for macOS Sierra 10.12.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80204 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Sep 12 15:29:16 2017 New Revision: 252029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252029=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80204 * config/darwin-driver.c

[Bug target/82112] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 12 15:25:15 2017 New Revision: 252028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252028=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82112 * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does -fsantize=undefined show anything? I am suspecting you have undefined behavior with respect to the shift.

[Bug tree-optimization/82192] New: gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

LLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /gcc-dev/trunk/configure --prefix=/gcc-dev/bin-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170912 (Rev. 252003) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/82128] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Trying Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c === --- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252006) +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy) @@ -3862,24 +3862,18 @@

[Bug tree-optimization/82191] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/82128] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/82114] gcc.dg/gimplefe-14.c for bare metal and argc is 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug testsuite/82114] gcc.dg/gimplefe-14.c for bare metal and argc is 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82114 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Sep 12 14:32:39 2017 New Revision: 252024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252024=gcc=rev Log: Fix GIMPLE FE test (PR testsuite/82114) 2017-09-12 Martin Liska

[Bug tree-optimization/82128] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, causes Running /tmp/trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr65263.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) FAIL:

[Bug tree-optimization/82191] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82042] signed integer overflow in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I see, thanks for clarification. I'm going to send patch for the remaining bits, hopefully I made it in a right way.

[Bug tree-optimization/82157] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82157] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 12 14:15:37 2017 New Revision: 252020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252020=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Richard Biener PR

[Bug sanitizer/77631] no symbols in backtrace shown by ASan when debug info is split

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631 --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I don't think this is a dup of 67165, which is about compressed debug sections. This PR is about debug info in separate files.

[Bug libstdc++/79433] __has_include() is true but #include gives #error when -std=old

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 14:03:06 2017 New Revision: 252019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252019=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including TS headers with wrong -std PR

[Bug libstdc++/79433] __has_include() is true but #include gives #error when -std=old

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433 --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 14:02:59 2017 New Revision: 252018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252018=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/79433 no #error for including headers with wrong -std PR

[Bug target/82185] ICE: Segmentation fault in expand_binop gcc/optabs.c:1137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/82132] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-tail-nomask-1.c (test for excess errors) due to missing posix_memalign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82132 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > There is no "builtin" for this, the link fail will not go away. > Really? You did r207595 yourself, which is the revision that bug 65244 comment 11 said

[Bug libstdc++/70483] string_view::compare and coparision operators are not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.3 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/70483] string_view::compare and coparision operators are not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70483 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 12 13:31:20 2017 New Revision: 252017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252017=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/70483 make std::experimental::string_view fully constexpr PR

[Bug target/82185] ICE: Segmentation fault in expand_binop gcc/optabs.c:1137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82185 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Sep 12 13:27:13 2017 New Revision: 252008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252008=gcc=rev Log: PR81285: Fix uninitialised variable in emit_store_flag_int

[Bug middle-end/82149] match.pd: 2919: bad if test ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 12 13:21:52 2017 New Revision: 252007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252007=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-12 Richard Biener PR middle-end/82149

[Bug middle-end/82149] match.pd: 2919: bad if test ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82042] signed integer overflow in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82042 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/82004] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 628.pop2_s miscompare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004 > > Wilco changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state. Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 34640, which changed state. Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/39304] ICE with MATMUL, specific/generic functions and rank checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304 Bug 39304 depends on bug 34640, which changed state. Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82129] [8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82129 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Not yet analyzed but I see LIM performs store-motion on [0.00%] [count: INV] [loop 5 header]: - *h5_26(D) = tv_24(D); + h5__lsm.7_18 = tv_24(D); where I think stores from undefined SSA names could

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Thomas.

[Bug tree-optimization/82191] New: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82191 Bug ID: 82191 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in verify_use) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug debug/82144] [8 Regression] ICE in add_dwarf_attr with alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/82112] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 12 11:49:29 2017 New Revision: 252003 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252003=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82112 * c-common.c (sync_resolve_size): Instead of

[Bug tree-optimization/82128] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82128 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Latent issue in gimple-fold.c: Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c === --- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 252002) +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy)

[Bug target/81325] -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/82150] Produces a branch prefetch which causes a hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82150 --- Comment #3 from david.welch at netronome dot com --- The problem exists as well with ldr pc,[something]. I have not dug through gcc but did some compilation experiments, not nearly enough to be 100% sure, but for switch statements the code

[Bug sanitizer/82116] "nested bug in the same thread" when a bug is found while reporting another one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82116 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/82190] New: Possibly latent miscompilation issue on ppc64le-linux-gnu for memcpy-bi.c with -fweb -fno-optimize-strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82190 Bug ID: 82190 Summary: Possibly latent miscompilation issue on ppc64le-linux-gnu for memcpy-bi.c with -fweb -fno-optimize-strlen Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/82189] Two stage SLP needed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82188] Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82187] missed PRE at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82187 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/82186] [7/8 Regression] ICE (segfault), VLA type with inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82186 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/82184] [8 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug middle-end/82177] Alias analysis too aggressive with integer-to-pointer cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82188] Missed optimization opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82188 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/82175] [8 Regression] -march=native fails on armv7 big/little system armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf with gcc 8.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IIRC bitfield rvalues get promoted to 'int' before overload resolution applies but I may be wrong. enum bitfields may also be a GNU extension.

  1   2   >