[Bug c++/82226] New: previously instantiation of template type breaks future use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82226 Bug ID: 82226 Summary: previously instantiation of template type breaks future use Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/82225] New: Unexpected nondeterministic "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" when gcc is expected to save either rsp or rbp to allow its use in inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82225 Bug ID: 82225 Summary: Unexpected nondeterministic "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" when gcc is expected to save either rsp or rbp to allow its use in inline asm

[Bug target/79868] aarch64: diagnostic "malformed target %s value" not translateable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79868 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #16 from Josh Poimboeuf --- Ok. I thought you were saying that, with your new patch, putting "sp" in clobbers would *always* force DRAP, even in cases where the function doesn't need realignment. If you're *not* saying that, then

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #14) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > > (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12) > > > I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #14 from Josh Poimboeuf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12) > > I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the > > clobbers list, the stack does *not*

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #12) > I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the > clobbers list, the stack does *not* need to be realigned. And in those Yes, stack

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #12 from Josh Poimboeuf --- While I know about DRAP, I'm otherwise not very familiar with GCC internals, so I don't quite understand your points. I would like to clarify that most of the time, when we use "sp" in the clobbers list,

[Bug rtl-optimization/63281] powerpc64le creates 64 bit constants from scratch instead of loading them

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/82224] Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224 --- Comment #3 from Melissa --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > See PR 14319 which I think this is a dup of. PR 14319 refers to a case in which you are allowed to read the common prefix of a structure when the structure is not the

[Bug fortran/82205] parametrized derived types, problems with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/82223] Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of arithmetic types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81314] [6/7/8 Regression] Undefined reference to a function with -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:42:20 2017 New Revision: 252864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252864=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-14 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/82112] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:41:29 2017 New Revision: 252863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252863=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/82112] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82112 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:40:51 2017 New Revision: 252862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252862=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-12 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/81768] [8 Regression] error: control flow in the middle of basic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:39:36 2017 New Revision: 252861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252861=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/81768] [8 Regression] error: control flow in the middle of basic block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81768 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:38:43 2017 New Revision: 252860 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252860=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-05 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/81687] Compiler drops label in OpenMP region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81687 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:37:16 2017 New Revision: 252858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252858=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-08-09 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/81621] ICE in delete_insn, at cfgrtl.c:167 with s390x cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81621 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:35:48 2017 New Revision: 252857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252857=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/81052] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81052 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:34:10 2017 New Revision: 252856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252856=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-08-03 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/45784] gcc OpenMP - error: invalid controlling predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45784 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:33:08 2017 New Revision: 252855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252855=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-07-27 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/81766] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:924 caused by r250815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81766 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:32:05 2017 New Revision: 252854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252854=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-08-08 Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/79499] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79499 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:32:05 2017 New Revision: 252854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252854=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-08-08 Richard Biener

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:30:40 2017 New Revision: 252853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252853=gcc=rev Log: PR libquadmath/65757 * math/roundq.c: Cherry-pick upstream glibc

[Bug target/81225] [6 Regression] ICE with -mavx512ifma -O3 -ffloat-store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81225 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 21:30:04 2017 New Revision: 252852 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252852=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-06-30 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Are you sure? At least on gcc-6-branch I'm seeing: spawn -ignore SIGHUP /usr/src/gcc-6/obj28/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/gcc-6/obj28/gcc/ /usr/src/gcc-6/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr81224.c

[Bug c/82224] Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- And PR 65892.

[Bug c/82224] Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- See PR 14319 which I think this is a dup of.

[Bug target/80101] ICE in store_data_bypass_p, at recog.c:3737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80101 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/79794] unnecessary copy from target to target results in poor code for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79794 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou --- > Actually, the build still fails in the same place - here is the assembler > for the reduced test-case from pr81241. I'll look at the c++ test case in > due course. > > any thoughts? Take a look at the

[Bug target/82066] #pragma GCC target documentation does not say it is implemented for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82066 --- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Fri Sep 15 20:55:52 2017 New Revision: 252848 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252848=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-15 Steve Ellcey PR target/82066 *

[Bug c/82071] Error in assign-ops in combination with FLT_EVAL_METHOD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82071 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/82071] Error in assign-ops in combination with FLT_EVAL_METHOD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82071 --- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Fri Sep 15 20:49:02 2017 New Revision: 252847 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252847=gcc=rev Log: Implement C11 excess precision semantics for conversions (PR c/82071). C11

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/82224] New: Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82224 Bug ID: 82224 Summary: Strict-aliasing not noticing valid aliasing of two unions with active members Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/82223] Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of arithmetic types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (float)INT_MAX gets rounded to 2^31. When you try to convert it to int, it doesn't fit, so the compiler is at liberty to return INT_MAX if it likes. clang's -fsanitize=undefined does complain on your code (not

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #9) > I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use > case. We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up > before the

[Bug middle-end/82223] Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of arithmetic types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What target is this for?

[Bug middle-end/82223] New: Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of arithmetic types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82223 Bug ID: 82223 Summary: Incorrect optimization for lossy round trips of arithmetic types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 42183 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42183=edit assembler for C++ testcase with .cfi_xxx this gives, when linked to the GCC8 static libstdc++ (I have a patch that

[Bug c++/64644] "warning: anonymous union with no members" should be an error with -pedantic-errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64644] "warning: anonymous union with no members" should be an error with -pedantic-errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64644 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Sep 15 19:22:35 2017 New Revision: 252835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252835=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-09-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez

[Bug c++/68177] Lambda capture doesn't work correctly when lambda is used in a pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/82222] wrong uninitialized reference in lambda capture in fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) > Created attachment 42182 [details] > assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx > > I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim that they

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 42182 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42182=edit assembler for pr81241 Ada testcase with .cfi_xxx I rebased my patches to enable .cfi_xxx for Darwin (no claim that

[Bug c++/82222] New: wrong uninitialized reference in lambda capture in fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Bug ID: 8 Summary: wrong uninitialized reference in lambda capture in fold expression Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Try this one: diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 4f0414ffa9d..ee27273c80d 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -13801,6 +13801,7 @@

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #9 from Josh Poimboeuf --- I might be misunderstanding, but I don't think we need DRAP for our use case. We just need assurance that the frame pointer (RBP) has been set up before the inline asm is inserted. If clobbering "sp"

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #7) > Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on > the GCC mailing list a while back. And, other than this rare bug, it seems > to do

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On September 15, 2017 5:02:36 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > >--- Comment #16 from ro

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the patch in comment 7 applied on top of r252799, I have bootstrapped x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0, configured with: ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc8w

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #7 from Josh Poimboeuf --- Putting "sp" in the clobbers list is something that was suggested to me on the GCC mailing list a while back. And, other than this rare bug, it seems to do exactly what we want, which is, force GCC to save

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- paravirt_read_pmc should be fixed not to clobber SP when stack realignment is needed.

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- > So, FAOD, the fix is a work-around for a bug in either the assembler or > unwinder? (the original DWARF output is expected to be well-formed?) Yes, that's my understanding. > Given that the GCC unwinder

[Bug target/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou --- > I did this and there's nothing interesting revealed - everything > consistently gives the same output (and dwarfdump --verify claims it's > valid). Not for me though. Here's the output on the C++

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 42181 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42181=edit C++ testcase To be compiled at -O2 and run: (botcazou@goole) ~ $ g++ -o t t.C -O2 (botcazou@goole) ~ $ ./t

[Bug fortran/82215] Feature request to better support two pass compiling with gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215 --- Comment #5 from Lee Busby --- Thank you very much for reading my report, Mr. Koenig. I probably should have pulled out footnote #6 as an explicit comment here, as it comes closest to my own first guess at a "feature request". As you have

[Bug c++/78648] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78648 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Sep 15 16:31:15 2017 New Revision: 252829 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252829=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-13 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Sep 15 16:17:55 2017 New Revision: 252827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252827=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-15 Jackson Woodruff PR

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #3 from Arnd Bergmann --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #2) > Created attachment 42178 [details] > preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed > > This is one of the typical files showing the

[Bug rtl-optimization/82192] [5/6/7/8 Regression] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 15 15:54:04 2017 New Revision: 252824 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252824=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/82192 * combine.c (make_extraction): Don't

[Bug c/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #3 from Josh Poimboeuf --- This has been seen on Fedora GCC 7.1.1 and Debian GCC 6.2.0-3. This bug can be recreated with the above kernel git branch and the attached .config by typing "make ARCH=i386 arch/x86/events/core.o". I've

[Bug c/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf --- Created attachment 42180 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42180=edit kernel config file

[Bug c/82221] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 --- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf --- Created attachment 42179 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42179=edit preprocessed source

[Bug c/82221] New: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82221 Bug ID: 82221 Summary: internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:17656 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82158] _Noreturn functions that do return clobber caller's registers on ARM32 (but not other arches)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82158 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ada/81361] [8 regression] broken exception handling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81361 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13) > (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > > Bootstrap completed on Darwin with the tentative fix (and the workaround for > > PR target/80556) and the ACATS

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- > Thanks for the detailed analysis. Indeed > > /* Mark sections as preserved that are required by to be preserved > sections. */ >

[Bug tree-optimization/82220] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 482.sphinx3 ~10% performance regression with trunk@250416

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82220 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Nesterovskiy --- Yes, I've applied a patch and looks like it helped: --- Overhead SamplesSymbol trunk@252796 + patch 31.57%412037mgau_eval 30.54%--> 397608vector_gautbl_eval_logs3

[Bug middle-end/21850] [4.0 Regression] misscompiling comparision from vector to integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21850 --- Comment #6 from palves at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: palves Date: Fri Sep 15 14:53:48 2017 New Revision: 252822 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252822=gcc=rev Log: Fix compile time error when using ansidecl.h with an old version of

[Bug rtl-optimization/82192] [5/6/7/8 Regression] gcc produces incorrect code with -O2 and bit-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Also, stripped gcc/*.o files from the latest stage between non-patched and > patched differ just in the expected combine.o and cc1*checksum.o. I see no

[Bug c++/82069] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Another testcase: struct A { void foo(int *); }; struct B : A { template void bar(int *p1) { [&] { foo(p1); }; }; };

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 79987, which changed state. Bug 79987 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/79987] [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/79987] [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:57 2017 New Revision: 252820 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252820=gcc=rev Log: Backport r251049 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug tree-optimization/79987] [CHKP] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12151

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79987 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 14:11:27 2017 New Revision: 252819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252819=gcc=rev Log: Backport r251049 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug fortran/82184] [8 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184 --- Comment #9 from Andrey Guskov --- Yep, 187 seems to be working now. Not sure about performance, will check this next week when the automatic perf build arrives.

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 --- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 42178 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42178=edit preprocessed linux/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c, compressed This is one of the typical files showing the

[Bug c++/78648] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78648 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---

[Bug target/67591] ARM v8 Thumb IT blocks deprecated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67591 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Fri Sep 15 13:12:33 2017 New Revision: 252817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252817=gcc=rev Log: [PR target/67591] ARM v8 Thumb IT blocks are deprecated 2017-09-15 Christophe

[Bug c++/82219] [8 Regression] Not wanted warning: "type qualifiers ignored on cast result type" on template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80947] [6/7/8 Regression] Different visibility for the lambda and its capture list members with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Vlad Zolotarov from comment #10) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > > It says not to attach an archive containing the things we don't want (e.g. > > sources without includes).

[Bug sanitizer/81715] asan-stack=1 redzone allocation is too inflexible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state. Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 What|Removed |Added

[Bug demangler/82195] Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug demangler/82195] Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Sep 15 12:23:57 2017 New Revision: 252815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252815=gcc=rev Log: [demangler] Fix nested generic lambda

[Bug c++/81355] SegFault when using attribute target dispatch with empty parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81696] [5/6/7 Regression] ICF ICE on non-local goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/82001] [5/6/7 regression] wrong code when two functions differ only in inline asm register constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/63361] Test case c-c++-common/ubsan/float-cast-overflow-1.c fails on Pentium2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 12:15:52 2017 New Revision: 252814 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252814=gcc=rev Log: Backport r249728 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug sanitizer/81224] ICE in -fsanitize=address w/ a register variable of a vector type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81224 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:40 2017 New Revision: 252813 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252813=gcc=rev Log: Backport r249728 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug inline-asm/82001] [5/6/7 regression] wrong code when two functions differ only in inline asm register constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:19 2017 New Revision: 252812 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252812=gcc=rev Log: Backport r251530 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug c++/81355] SegFault when using attribute target dispatch with empty parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81355 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 15 12:14:01 2017 New Revision: 252811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252811=gcc=rev Log: Backport r251020 2017-09-15 Martin Liska Backport from

  1   2   >