[Bug rtl-optimization/82576] New: sbitmap_vector_alloc() not ready for 64 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82576 Bug ID: 82576 Summary: sbitmap_vector_alloc() not ready for 64 bits Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/78808] target_clones not applying to openmp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78808 --- Comment #9 from Steven Noonan --- Actually, I lied. It's not quite working. It's obviously close though. The following examples of the issue are using my n-body implementation: https://github.com/tycho/nbody Each of the variants of n-body

[Bug rtl-optimization/78911] [6 Regression] Infinite loop at -O2/O3 optimization levels while trying to compile server.c from Wine-2.0-rc2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911 Viktor Yu. Kovalskii changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vityokster at gmail dot com ---

[Bug ada/82573] GNAT.Registry doesn't read/write with HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82573 Andrew John Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu_andrew at member dot fsf.org

[Bug c++/82572] throw on line by itself in constexpr function aborts compile even if never reached

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||80061 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/82574] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171016 (experimental) [trunk revision 253793] (GCC) $ $ gcctk

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 --- Comment #10 from asmwarrior --- Is it related to pointer casting? I see this post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36816363/gcc-4-9-3-more-aggressive-null-pointer-check-removal Some one reported that the Null check was removed in the

[Bug c++/82572] New: throw on line by itself in constexpr function aborts compile even if never reached

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82572 Bug ID: 82572 Summary: throw on line by itself in constexpr function aborts compile even if never reached Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/58150] debug info about definition of enum class not emitted if the declaration was already used in a class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150 npl at chello dot at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npl at chello dot at --- Comment

[Bug other/82569] [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is one of those SPEC tests so I can't post the whole .i. I will see if I can extract part of it that still shows the same bad STW/LD behavior. I probably will not get to it until tomorrow,

[Bug sanitizer/82353] [8 Regression] runtime ubsan crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82353 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Mon Oct 16 20:34:53 2017 New Revision: 253796 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253796=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug c++/69078] [C++14] function local static not initialized when only used in a generic/variadic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69078 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/82567] [6/7/8] gfortran takes a long time to compile a simple implied-do with -Optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82567 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/82569] [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/82571] New: missing strlen optimization for memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82571 Bug ID: 82571 Summary: missing strlen optimization for memchr Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/81758] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] Broken vtab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig --- And with r241439, the test fails. Andre, any ideas?

[Bug fortran/81758] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] Broken vtab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig --- With r241438, the test passes.

[Bug c++/82570] New: Lambda fails to compile because it doesn't meet constexpr requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82570 Bug ID: 82570 Summary: Lambda fails to compile because it doesn't meet constexpr requirements Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78152] [6/7/8 Regression] coarray and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67543] ICE on associate with improper association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67543 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/81903] [OOP] problem with ASSOCIATE and class pointer (Invalid character in name at)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80120] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect error with associate construct and character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52832] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/67543] ICE on associate with improper association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67543 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug tree-optimization/78512] [7 Regression] r242674 miscompiles Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug fortran/81903] [OOP] problem with ASSOCIATE and class pointer (Invalid character in name at)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81903 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug fortran/78152] [6/7/8 Regression] coarray and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug fortran/80120] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect error with associate construct and character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80120 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug fortran/82121] [7/8 Regression] Unclassifiable statement during compilation when assigning to a Character array in a derived type contained in a ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82121 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug fortran/52832] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 19:44:04 2017 New Revision: 253794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253794=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52832 *

[Bug sanitizer/82545] [7/8 Regression] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #7 from Ivo Raisr --- If no viable solution to splitting an abnormal edge is found, I wonder if we could actually prevent getting into this situation?

[Bug other/82569] New: [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82569 Bug ID: 82569 Summary: [8 regression] failure in 177.mesa cpu2000 test case after r253530 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/81048] [6/7/8 Regression] incorrect derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 16 18:48:56 2017 New Revision: 253793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253793=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paul Thomas PR fortran/81048 *

[Bug fortran/25297] Support for STRUCTURE/END STRUCTURE and RECORD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25297 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/82567] [6/7/8] gfortran takes a long time to compile a simple implied-do with -Optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82567 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The change occurred between revisions r197010 (2013-03-23, fast) and r197238 > (2013-03-29, slow), likely r197217. More likely r197216.

[Bug fortran/82568] [6/7/8] ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/82567] [6/7/8] gfortran takes a long time to compile a simple implied-do with -Optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81758] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] Broken vtab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #10 from DIL --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9) > I just checked on powerpc64 with a rather current trunk with > > gfc::bank testing status:0 (PASSED): Performance: > 2888199.6889235629 >

[Bug fortran/82511] [7/8 Regression] ICE Bad IO basetype (12) on attempted read or write of entire DEC structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82511 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/81758] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] Broken vtab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- I just checked on powerpc64 with a rather current trunk with gfc::bank testing status:0 (PASSED): Performance: 2888199.6889235629 gfc::vector testing status:0 (PASSED):

[Bug fortran/82511] [7/8 Regression] ICE Bad IO basetype (12) on attempted read or write of entire DEC structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82511 --- Comment #7 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Mon Oct 16 17:40:53 2017 New Revision: 253791 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253791=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Fritz Reese PR fortran/82511 Treat

[Bug other/82547] wide_int is not setting overflow properly for large unsigned add/subtract calculations.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod --- On a further note, this appears to be because wide_int tries not to use all the words is it can sign extend? the sequence with the issue is: Mn = wi::min_value (128, UNSIGNED); Mx = wi::max_value (128,

[Bug c++/82566] Internal compiler error in type deduction (with C++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82566 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/82568] New: ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568 Bug ID: 82568 Summary: ICE with do-loop inside BLOCK inside omp Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/82567] New: [6/7/8] gfortran takes a long time to compile a simple implied-do with -Optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82567 Bug ID: 82567 Summary: [6/7/8] gfortran takes a long time to compile a simple implied-do with -Optimization. Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/82566] Internal compiler error in type deduction (with C++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82566 --- Comment #1 from Peter Gottschling --- Created attachment 42379 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42379=edit Preprocessed source compressed with bzip2.

[Bug c++/82566] New: Internal compiler error in type deduction (with C++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82566 Bug ID: 82566 Summary: Internal compiler error in type deduction (with C++11) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/82564] ICE at -O1 and above: in assign_stack_temp_for_type, at function.c:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82564 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to PR 8081.

[Bug middle-end/82564] ICE at -O1 and above: in assign_stack_temp_for_type, at function.c:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82564 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be a dup of this bug already filed too.

[Bug c++/82565] New: Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82565 Bug ID: 82565 Summary: Concept and lambda return type deduction cause compilation to crash with "mmap: Cannot allocate memory" Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking needs a separate warning flag controlling it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/82564] New: ICE at -O1 and above: in assign_stack_temp_for_type, at function.c:783

/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171016

[Bug c++/64931] ICE on function with deduced return type and input is instantiated template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64931 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64931] ICE on function with deduced return type and input is instantiated template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64931 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 16 14:21:17 2017 New Revision: 253788 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253788=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug target/82498] Missed optimization for x86 rotate instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498 --- Comment #17 from Jack Lloyd --- Thank you!

[Bug c++/80567] bogus fixit hint for undeclared memset: else

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80567 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/82563] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82563 Bug ID: 82563 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug target/82442] vect/pr31699.c fails on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82442 --- Comment #1 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Oct 16 13:26:20 2017 New Revision: 253786 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253786=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR82442 Recently the gcc.dg/vect/pr31699.c was modified to check for vect_float

[Bug gcov-profile/82527] Branch probabilities does not match on optimized switch cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82527 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 Sam van Kampen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at segfault dot party --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/82545] [7/8 Regression] -O2: ICE in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2838, during GIMPLE pass sanopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82545 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- What we do: a () { int b; int b.0_1; [100.00%] [count: INV]: __builtin_setjmp_setup (0B, &); goto ; [99.96%] [count: INV] [0.12%] [count: INV]: : __builtin_setjmp_receiver (&); goto ;

[Bug sanitizer/82501] AddressSanitizer does not handle negative offset for first global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/google/s

[Bug c++/82562] Incorrect warning: use copy-assignment or copy-initialization instead when copying build objects.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82562 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/82562] Incorrect warning: use copy-assignment or copy-initialization instead when copying build objects.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82562 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/57925] discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 --- Comment #10 from Timon Knigge --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > Yes it's still open, so a fix would be welcome. Please see > http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html if you want to contribute a fix for it. W.r.t. to the 'legal'

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Further reduced: extern "C" int printf(const char*, ...); struct Foo { Foo(const char *) { printf("%p\tFoo(const char*)\n", this); } ~Foo() { printf("%p\t~Foo()\n", this); } }; struct

[Bug c++/82562] New: Incorrect warning: use copy-assignment or copy-initialization instead when copying build objects.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82562 Bug ID: 82562 Summary: Incorrect warning: use copy-assignment or copy-initialization instead when copying build objects. Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug c++/82560] [7/8 Regression] Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 Sylvestre Ledru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 --- Comment #5 from Sylvestre Ledru --- Created attachment 42377 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42377=edit the .ii

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 --- Comment #4 from Sylvestre Ledru --- Created attachment 42376 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42376=edit the .s

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- OK, thanks. Can you please also attach the --save-temps -fdirectives-only file?

[Bug c++/15339] [DR217] Adding default arguments to function templates in redeclarations should be forbidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||filip.roseen at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/61471] redeclaration of default-argument in function template declaration not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61471 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61472] added default-argument in later declaration of function template not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61472 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61471] redeclaration of default-argument in function template declaration not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61471 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 61472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/61471] redeclaration of default-argument in function template declaration not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61471 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed in GCC 5.1.0: d.cc:2:31: error: redeclaration of ‘template void f(int)’ may not have default arguments [-fpermissive] template void f(int=3); // ill-formed ^ If we

[Bug c++/59002] [meta-bug] Access checking in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002 Bug 59002 depends on bug 58896, which changed state. Bug 58896 Summary: Incorrect handling of a private nested type of a template specialization in the main template https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58896 What|Removed

[Bug c++/58896] Incorrect handling of a private nested type of a template specialization in the main template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58896 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/47346] access control for nested type is ignored in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug c/71996] -fdump-translation-unit fails to dump string literals of type char16_t/char32_t/wchar_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71996 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 --- Comment #2 from Sylvestre Ledru --- Created attachment 42375 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42375=edit preprocessed file

[Bug c++/82561] [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82561] New: [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82561 Bug ID: 82561 Summary: [8 regression] crash on internal compiler error: in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:3778 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/82498] Missed optimization for x86 rotate instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82498 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/62263] Good codegen for bitwise rotate requires code that is technically undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62263 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/53574] ICE with -fstack-usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67466] Project segfaulting, working with other compilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67100] ICE(in type_dependent_expression_p) on macro function + user defined literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67100 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/82472] [8 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition, at tree-loop-distribution.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82472 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61351] ICE on valid when deducing template arguments with nested expansions of the same pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61351 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61341] ICE for variadic templates: tsubst at cp/pt.c:11313, tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo

[Bug c++/53574] ICE with -fstack-usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 16 08:36:06 2017 New Revision: 253778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253778=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/53574 * g++.dg/other/pr53574.C: New test. Added:

[Bug c++/61323] 'static' and 'const' attributes cause non-type template argument matching failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61323 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82556] [8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 Christoph Berg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||myon at debian dot org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/61323] 'static' and 'const' attributes cause non-type template argument matching failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61323 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 16 08:25:31 2017 New Revision: 253777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253777=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 Paolo Carlini PR

  1   2   >