https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #13)
> Cacheline size is 32 bytes according to the documentation:
>
> > www.st.com/resource/en/user_manual/cd00147165.pdf (page 75)
Cache line sizes of origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774
Bug 49774 depends on bug 35503, which changed state.
Bug 35503 Summary: Warning about restricted pointers?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35503
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Dec 16 23:58:34 2017
New Revision: 255755
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255755&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78918 - missing -Wrestrict on memcpy copying over sel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
T B changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #14 from T B ---
Then I have to reread the code, thank you.
I will mark this topic as resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83445
Bug ID: 83445
Summary: conversion function has too high priority in overload
resolution
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80641
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |
Summary|[7/8 Regression] Warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81937
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81937
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Dec 16 22:41:13 2017
New Revision: 255754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-16 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
With the libstdc++ patch committed in r255753 the warning is no longer issued.
Jeff, do you want to keep this open as a reminder to look into the ideas in
comment #12 and later?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83239
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Dec 16 22:37:22 2017
New Revision: 255753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83239 - False positive from -Wstringop-overflow
on s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83308
--- Comment #13 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Cacheline size is 32 bytes according to the documentation:
> www.st.com/resource/en/user_manual/cd00147165.pdf (page 75)
PC quantum should be 2 bytes as SH uses a 16-bit instruction encoding.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81937
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Dec 16 21:57:17 2017
New Revision: 255752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-16 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83444
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The first revision that fails to eliminate the abort is r216728, though from
the patch is sounds like the underlying cause might be a limitation in the
strlen pass.
2014-10-27 Richard Biener
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83444
Bug ID: 83444
Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] missing strlen optimization on a
member array of a local struct
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, I didn't just fix the error code, the code will copy files larger than 2G
now.
I assume your 5.4 build doesn't use sendfile, so doesn't have the 2G limitation
of sendfile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
call expand is OK. pro_and_epilogue doesn't adjust outgoing stack
to properly align stack for
(insn 27 10 17 2 (set (mem:V1TI (reg/f:DI 7 sp) [0 S16 A128])
(reg:V1TI 21 xmm0 [95])) "x.i":17 1258 {movv1ti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Dec 16 19:59:14 2017
New Revision: 255751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-16 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81937
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Dec 16 19:50:42 2017
New Revision: 255750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-16 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/81937
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
call expand is wrong:
(insn 6 5 7 2 (parallel [
(set (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int -16 [0xfff0])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83443
Bug ID: 83443
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test
for warnings, line 119)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83442
Bug ID: 83442
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/expensive-selftests-1.c -- timeout
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82860
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83279
--- Comment #12 from T B ---
Thanks!
However, if I understand your code right, you simply fixed the error code,
right? So that it is still not possible to copy files larger than 2GiB.
Wouldn't it be possible to create a loop in which in each run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83441
Bug ID: 83441
Summary: Null this captured in lambda in class variable
initializer for templated classes
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82278
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82767
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82767
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Dec 16 16:21:23 2017
New Revision: 255749
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255749&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/82767
* gcc.target/i386/pr71321.c: Test with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83424
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82849
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82849
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Dec 16 16:01:26 2017
New Revision: 255748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-16 Jan Hubicka
PR rtl-optimization/82849
* modu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80885
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02233.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Paolo Bonzini from comment #7)
> re. comment #5, like this?
>
> Index: gcc.c
> ===
> --- gcc.c (revision 128902)
> +++ gcc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81914
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
For the particular case of <=> (-1, 0 or 1), I've seen code like (a>b)-(a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83338
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 7.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Vector |[6 Regression] Vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] gcc|[6 Regression] gcc
|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Bogus |[6 Regression] Bogus
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 7.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression]
|THREAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80819
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 regression] Useless|[6 regression] Useless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression]
|attrib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80583
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE|[6 Regression] ICE deleting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81212
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[6 Regression]
|-Wretu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Compiling |[6 Regression] Compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE on |[6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Wrong |[6 Regression] Wrong
|
67 matches
Mail list logo
