[Bug gcov-profile/83587] [GCOV]A goto statement inside if statement leads the label incorrectly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83587 --- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang --- Understand. Thanks very much. (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Confirmed, however note that as labels are tricky statement without any > effect, I assign this very low priority.

[Bug tree-optimization/83605] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/83587] [GCOV]A goto statement inside if statement leads the label incorrectly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83587 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/82522] std::map::insert(value_type &&) not selected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82522 --- Comment #9 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Thu Dec 28 05:37:54 2017 New Revision: 256018 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256018=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-28 François Dumont Backport from

[Bug libstdc++/83607] New: std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83607 Bug ID: 83607 Summary: std::boyer_moore_searcher is slow searching through arrays of std::byte Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 --- Comment #21 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #20) > If nonzero_bits1 isn't changed, then we may need to remove the > WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS definition in the ia64 port. Unfortunately, I > don't have access

[Bug fortran/83606] co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- Is this a duplicate of Bug #81773?

[Bug target/57717] error: unrecognizable insn compiling ./strtod_l.c from glibc on powerpc-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57717 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83606] New: co-indexed array RHS yields incorrect result in assignment to vector-indexed LHS

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: damian at sourceryinstitute dot org Target Milestone: --- The commands below use MPICH 3.2 installed by GCC 8 trunk dated 20171227. Alternatively, the code can

[Bug tree-optimization/81611] [8 Regression] gcc un-learned loop / post-increment optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611 --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva --- Testing has revealed that the alternative complementary candidate patch introduces a number of regressions, in tests intended specifically to detect this kind of problem. I don't see an easy way to delay

[Bug libstdc++/83601] std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping in SED mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83600] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators not equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/83598] std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/83598] std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 27 22:18:02 2017 New Revision: 256013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256013=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83598 don't modify flags passed to std::basic_regex constructors

[Bug libstdc++/83600] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators not equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 27 22:18:08 2017 New Revision: 256014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256014=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83600 fix end iterator for unready std::match_results PR

[Bug libstdc++/83600] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators not equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83092] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092 lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/83598] std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/83538] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference != value_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83538] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference != value_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 27 19:43:33 2017 New Revision: 256012 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256012=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83538 fix std::match_results::reference (LWG 2306) PR

[Bug libstdc++/83538] std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: reference != value_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83538 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was changed by https://wg21.link/lwg2306

[Bug libstdc++/83598] std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83092] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83092 --- Comment #3 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: lkrupp Date: Wed Dec 27 19:20:12 2017 New Revision: 256011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256011=gcc=rev Log: 2017_12_27 Louis Krupp PR

[Bug target/83604] [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 --- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 42974 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42974=edit Tentative patch with testcase Currently doing: - bootstrap and reg test on x86_64, and - build & libgomp regtest on

[Bug target/82096] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 --- Comment #5 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- As far as I can see, the function expand_atomic_compare_and_swap() calls emit_store_flag_force() with a explicit VOIDmode and because of this, do_compare_rtx_and_jump() fails to split the

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 --- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries --- Tentative patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/lto-cgraph.c b/gcc/lto-cgraph.c index ed3df15b143..de5655abbb6 100644 --- a/gcc/lto-cgraph.c +++ b/gcc/lto-cgraph.c @@ -,6 +,16 @@ output_offload_tables (void)

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- Rewriting the test-case like this triggers the ICE without -Wreturn-type being active: ... /* { dg-do run { target openacc_nvidia_accel_selected } } */ /* This code uses nvptx inline assembly guarded with

[Bug target/83604] [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42973 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42973=edit gcc8-pr83604.patch Untested fix for that ICE (plus lots of formatting fixes). VPSHRDW is still wrong, will fix too.

[Bug target/83604] [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I actually see a different ICE on sse-13.c without any command line options, reduced into: typedef short V __attribute__((__vector_size__(64))); __attribute__((target ("avx512vbmi2"))) V foo (V x, V y, V z)

[Bug tree-optimization/83573] [6/7/8 Regression] invalid access introduced in predcom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83573 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] invalid |[6/7/8 Regression] invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/83605] New: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605 Bug ID: 83605 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug gcov-profile/83599] [GCOV] A If TRUE statement lead the return statement has wrong number of execution in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83599 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83604] New: [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83604 Bug ID: 83604 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/83603] [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- And: $ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-4.c -O1 -c -Wrestrict ... /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-stringop-chk-4.c:384:6: internal compiler

[Bug tree-optimization/83603] [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- And one another test-case with a bit different back-trace: $ cat ice.c char *a, *b; void c () { __builtin_strncat (a, b, -1); } $ gcc ice.c -Os -Wrestrict during GIMPLE pass: wrestrict ice.c: In function

[Bug tree-optimization/83603] New: [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603 Bug ID: 83603 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug preprocessor/83602] New: [8 Regression] ICE in cpp_macro_definition_location(cpp_hashnode*) on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83602 Bug ID: 83602 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in cpp_macro_definition_location(cpp_hashnode*) on invalid code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug target/83488] [8 Regression] ICE on a CET test-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83488 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83553] [6 Regression] compiler removes body of the for-loop, although there is a case label inside

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83553 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] compiler |[6 Regression] compiler

[Bug tree-optimization/83055] [8 Regression] ICE in operator>, at profile-count.h:834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- One another test-case with a bit different back-trace: $ g++ /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p789a.C /dev/null -Wsuggest-final-types -Ofast during IPA pass: devirt

[Bug fortran/78983] [7/8 Regression] ICE with CAF-DT with allocatable member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT this PR is fixed by the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00099.html.

[Bug fortran/80235] ICE: coarrays, submodule

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80235 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > May be a duplicate of or similar to pr78983. While the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00099.html fixes pr78983 (AFAICT), this PR is only partially fixed by the patch % gfc -c

[Bug libstdc++/83601] New: std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping in SED mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83601 Bug ID: 83601 Summary: std::regex_replace C++14 conformance issue: escaping in SED mode Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8) > > I'll defer to Joseph or any other C FE maintainers to make the final call. > >

[Bug fortran/80555] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE when using MAXVAL of a rank-2 PARAMETER array in a module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83600] New: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators not equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83600 Bug ID: 83600 Summary: std::match_results C++14 conformance issue: iterators not equal Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/83599] New: [GCOV] A If TRUE statement lead the return statement has wrong number of execution in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83599 Bug ID: 83599 Summary: [GCOV] A If TRUE statement lead the return statement has wrong number of execution in gcov Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/83598] New: std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83598 Bug ID: 83598 Summary: std::basic_regex C++14 conformance issue: resulting flags != passed flags Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80555] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE when using MAXVAL of a rank-2 PARAMETER array in a module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > AFAICT this is fixed on trunk, likely revision r255542. > > Any plan to back port the commit? The patch applies cleanly to gcc-7, so I'll run a

[Bug c/83595] [8 Regression] ICE: in linemap_macro_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.c:1008 on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83595 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/83593] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83593 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/83594] [8 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa-visibility.c:640 with __attribute__((noipa))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83594 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/83597] Compilation error reg multiple declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83597 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] [7 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] [7/8 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Dec 27 09:30:14 2017 New Revision: 256009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256009=gcc=rev Log: Assign result of get_string_lenth to a SSA_NAME (PR tree-optimization/83552).

[Bug fortran/80555] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE when using MAXVAL of a rank-2 PARAMETER array in a module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80555 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c/83597] New: Compilation error reg multiple declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83597 Bug ID: 83597 Summary: Compilation error reg multiple declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/83584] "ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type" -- no, not really

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- -pedantic is not designed to reject all programs that are not strictly conforming, but to enable emitting all _required_ diagnostics. I don't think a conversion between function and

[Bug c++/83046] ICE in nvptx offloading, C++ compilation of libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/gang-static-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nvptx --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries