https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662
Bug ID: 83662
Summary: std::aligned_alloc() not available
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83661
Bug ID: 83661
Summary: sincos does not handle sin(2x)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660
Bug ID: 83660
Summary: ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva ---
We do have such constant propagation on such ports as x86* and arm, but not on
avr. Presumably (I haven't checked) it has to do with available addressing
modes, and gimple's avoiding, even in MEM_REFs, ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83636
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
and we found a new problem of libffi:
https://github.com/libffi/libffi/pull/401
/* lui $12,high(codeloc) */
tramp[2] = 0x3c0c | ((unsigned)codeloc >> 16);
/* jr $25 */
+#if !define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No problem Eric. I'm monitoring on behalf of Florian who'd really like to see
this fixed for gcc-8.
Actually just noticed it still wasn't showing up in the queries. It didn't
have a target milestone set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19)
> Note you lost the regression marker when this was made a duplicate of 21161.
> So it's unlikely anyone would have looked at it until the next release cycle.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
You know, I wonder if we're missing something bigger here.
ISTM we're potentially missing CSEs in memory addresses as well as forward
propagation opportunities in MEM_REF expressions.
I strongly suspect D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
--- Comment #29 from Jim Wilson ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #28)
> 1. Is it directly visible for you from RTL dumps which bits GCC assumes as
> non-zero or you just know RTL invariants? I had to patch gcc locally to
> verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
20180102 (experimental) [trunk revision 256110] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.4.0 small.cpp
$ icc small.cpp
$ clang++ small.cpp
$
$ g++tk small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
small.cpp:7:42: internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:6821
reinterpret_cast < int * > (&a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83658
Bug ID: 83658
Summary: any::emplace deletes invalid memory when an overloaded
operator new() throws
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
Bug 45689 depends on bug 83650, which changed state.
Bug 83650 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong simplification in cshift with
negative shifts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 2 23:03:11 2018
New Revision: 256113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-02 Thomas Koenig
Backport from 7-branch
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
--- Comment #28 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Thanks all for very insightful comments and sorting out
WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS ambiguity! I've understood quite a bit on how RTL does
it's magic.
I still have a few related questions to clarify thing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83657
Bug ID: 83657
Summary: detect invalid calls to built-ins declared without
prototype
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656
Bug ID: 83656
Summary: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on declaration
without prototype
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83655
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83655
Bug ID: 83655
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid call to memcpy
declared with no prototype
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I've deliberately avoided doing this ... (turning SSA propagator UNDEFINED
> into a random value rather than keeping it effectively VARYING during
> propagation/si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83654
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
I forgot to add a compiler barrier to f2 for the executable test case, so it is
not strictly equivalent.
With it, valgrind reports:
==375147== Invalid read of size 4
==375147==at 0x8048403: f2 (in /roo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83654
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer ---
I forgot to mention that I used “-O2 -fstack-clash-protection”, but there's a
valgrind warning with -O0, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83654
Bug ID: 83654
Summary: -fstack-clash-protection probes below the stack
pointer for VLA with constant size
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note you lost the regression marker when this was made a duplicate of 21161.
So it's unlikely anyone would have looked at it until the next release cycle.
My understanding from Florian is that at least so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653
Bug ID: 83653
Summary: GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83602
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Sorry about the breakage.
Patch looks reasonable to me. Maybe cpp_macro_definition_location should gain
an assertion that CPP_HASHNODE_VALUE_IDX (node) == NTV_MACRO ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83652
Bug ID: 83652
Summary: template substitution fails on operator
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 2 18:14:04 2018
New Revision: 256088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45689
* intrins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 2 18:07:41 2018
New Revision: 256087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83556
* tree.c (replace_placeholders_r): Pass NULL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83556
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 2 18:04:19 2018
New Revision: 256086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83556
* tree.c (replace_placeholders_r): Pass NULL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 2 18:01:31 2018
New Revision: 256085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83650
* simplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83497
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #0)
> mgrid started failing (output miscompare) with r254730. The following
> options demonstrate the failure "-O3 -mcpu=power6 -ffast-math".
Incomplete option set, -m32 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 2 17:51:26 2018
New Revision: 256084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45689
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83649
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 2 17:51:26 2018
New Revision: 256084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/45689
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #27 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
IOW:
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -10866,10 +10866,11 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator,
inner_declarator = declarator->declarator;
- /* We don't want to warn in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I'm wondering if simply disabling the warning in TYPENAME would make sense (it
suppresses the warning).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83497
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
>
> As far as I see the miscompare is -0.8 vs. 0.18 so it doesn't look like a
> precision issue to me. Does it only happen for power6 / bigendian?
>
Yes, the fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83644
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82190
--- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Tue Jan 2 17:02:17 2018
New Revision: 256083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing changelog entry:
2017-12-12 Aaron Sawdey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83644
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 2 17:02:14 2018
New Revision: 256082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83644
* g++.dg/cpp1z/pr83644.C: New test.
Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83651
Bug ID: 83651
Summary: [7.2 regression] 20% slowdown of linux kernel AES
cipher
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83644
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced to:
namespace std {
template bool is_invocable_v;
}
template auto compose(F) {
[](auto... objs) noexcept(std::is_invocable_v){};
}
auto f() { compose(3); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83641
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So the issue here is when we have a noreturn function we use a push/pop
sequence to probe the top of the stack.
The generic dwarf2 CFI bits interpret the pop as restoring the value of the
popped register.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #19 from Petr Špaček ---
Sure, I would be happy with any version, thank you!
For people who want to generate code coverage reports for parallel executions,
beware of https://github.com/linux-test-project/lcov/issues/37.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #20 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
Richard,
I did quick static analysis for your latest patch.
Using command line “-g -Ofast -mfpmath=sse -funroll-loops -march=znver1” your
latest patch
doesn’t affects the issue I discussed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83641
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note this is specific to x86/x86_64 noreturn functions. No other targets are
potentially affected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83641
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I don't see the distinction here. Ia64 has instructions that operate on
> 32-bit values too, like cmp4.
The distinction is precisely what WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS conveys. On SPARC
and MIPS for example,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83641
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83650
Bug ID: 83650
Summary: [7/8 Regression] Wrong simplification in cshift with
negative shifts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83544
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 83573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 2 15:05:09 2018
New Revision: 256076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81860
* g++.dg/cpp0x/inh-ctor30.C: New test.
Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83585
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83592
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83644
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #43 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
> --- Comment #42 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #42 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #41 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
>> Unfortunately not: it's really the section index pointing to the
>> non-existing (i.e. eliminated) .gnu.debuglto_.debug_info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #41 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
> --- Comment #40 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo