https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 03:56:14AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
>
> I think I prefer this patch, regression tested OK.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems like real___cxa_throw was not being initialized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77433
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
Bug ID: 84428
Summary: ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384
"((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0,
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jvdelisle at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Looking at our -fdump-tree-original, since the derived type contains nothing we
are not building any call to output anything.
>From a practical point of view its a nonsensical case and one could argue to
not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83542
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
--- Comment #37 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Another thought for dealing with this BZ: Use the infrastructure Alex built to
identify blocks that are in effect forwarders (ie, they need not be copied for
jump threading). Use that knowledge to thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83991
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84317
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] Location |Location views breaks cross
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Feb 17 00:25:15 2018
New Revision: 257779
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257779&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR target/79242
* machmode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84424
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 16 23:26:49 2018
New Revision: 257774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/84277
* gnat.dg/array11.adb (Array11): Tweak in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 16 23:27:21 2018
New Revision: 257775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/84277
* gnat.dg/array11.adb (Array11): Tweak in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84277
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 16 23:26:08 2018
New Revision: 257773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/84277
* gnat.dg/array11.adb (Array11): Tweak in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84425
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 23:05:00 2018
New Revision: 257772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/84425
* ipa-inline.c (inline_small_functions): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84424
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> I can confirm it with r257668 but not with the top of trunk (r257768). The
> regression was introduced in r251948. I vaguely remember a bug with a test
> case simi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84418
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 22:40:32 2018
New Revision: 257771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257771&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/84418
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_trans_omp_clauses):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84192
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 16 22:38:53 2018
New Revision: 257770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84192
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Feb 16 22:36:53 2018
New Revision: 257769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/79064
* g++.dg/overload15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84416
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Ignoring weird targets (m32c...), there's no valid use for array indices
larger than size_t / ptrdiff_t (beyond I suppose any optimization effects
from knowing that the conversion of the ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
On i686 with many cores, r257758 gave:
...
goroutine 24690 [GC worker (idle)]:
runtime.mcall
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/libgo/runtime/proc.c:342
runtime.gopark
/export/build/gnu/gcc-32bit/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > powerpc failure of floating-point extensions to quiet signaling NaNs
> > (because loads implicitly extend from float to double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84427
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84426
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84424
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
PPER=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180216 (ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:34:57 2018
New Revision: 257768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84151 - unnecessary volatile load with static member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83911
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81853
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81853
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:06:50 2018
New Revision: 257766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81853 - using-directive and constexpr.
* constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:06:45 2018
New Revision: 257765
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257765&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84420 - ICE with structured binding in lambda.
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83835
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:06:39 2018
New Revision: 257764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83835 - C++17 error with constructor ctors.
* call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:06:56 2018
New Revision: 257767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84151 - unnecessary volatile load with static member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83835
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81853
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:02:55 2018
New Revision: 257762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81853 - using-directive and constexpr.
* constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81594
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
What's the status of this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:03:02 2018
New Revision: 257763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84151 - unnecessary volatile load with static member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 21:02:50 2018
New Revision: 257761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257761&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84420 - ICE with structured binding in lambda.
* l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84426
Bug ID: 84426
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with conflicting class member names
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535
--- Comment #11 from Yury Gribov ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Fri Feb 16 20:38:14 2018
New Revision: 257760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PowerPC tests in PR 81535.
gcc/testsuite/
2018-02-16 Yury Gribov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81853
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84420
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83835
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 20:05:28 2018
New Revision: 257757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83835 - C++17 error with constructor ctors.
* call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84425
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43444&action=edit
gcc8-pr84425.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84387
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84425
Bug ID: 84425
Summary: [8 Regression] Hang in ipa-inline.c starting with
r250048
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83835
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82148
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthias.hochsteger@tuwien.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82664
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82664
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 19:06:59 2018
New Revision: 257754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82664 - ICE with reference to function template parm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82664
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 19:06:34 2018
New Revision: 257753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82664 - ICE with reference to function template parm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84419
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59912
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84080
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n.sakisaka at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84344
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt ---
This got fixed on 2018-02-13.
I suspect this was Jason's patch for PR84080.
Do we want to add this as an additional testcase?
Or should we just close this bug?
=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.1 20180216 (experimental) [trunk revision 257739] (GCC)
$
$ g++-7.2.0 -c tmp.cpp
$
$ g++tk -c tmp.cpp
tmp.cpp:4:42: internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or
union_type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84410
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84114
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #5)
> (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #4)
> > While teaching the reassociation pass about fma's seems like the right
> > answer would it be reasonable (and simpler) to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423
Bug ID: 84423
Summary: [concepts] ICE with invalid using declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70023
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 16 18:17:09 2018
New Revision: 257751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/70023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
Bug ID: 84422
Summary: ICE on various builtin test functions when compiled
with -mcpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84354
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84354
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Fri Feb 16 18:01:02 2018
New Revision: 257750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-16 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/84354
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82664
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 16:45:49 2018
New Revision: 257746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257746&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82764 - C++17 ICE with empty base
* class.c (buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82764
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 16:44:26 2018
New Revision: 257745
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257745&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82764 - C++17 ICE with empty base
* class.c (buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 16 16:44:17 2018
New Revision: 257744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84421 - type-dependent if constexpr
* semantics.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #49 from Wilco ---
AArch64 does this:
(define_expand "vec_store_lanesoi"
[(set (match_operand:OI 0 "aarch64_simd_struct_operand" "=Utv")
(unspec:OI [(match_operand:OI 1 "register_operand" "w")
(unspec:VQ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84348
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064
--- Comment #1 from Hubert Tong ---
This appears to have been fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
Still seeing at least os/signal having random pass/fail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84421
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Is that really a rejects-valid
Yes, bool(v) is a constant-expression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096
--- Comment #11 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Fri Feb 16 15:37:35 2018
New Revision: 257741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257741&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix emit_store_flag_force () function to fix ICE in int_mode_for_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82468
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo