[Bug middle-end/84433] New: gcc 7 and before miscompile loop and remove exit due to incorrect range calculation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84433 Bug ID: 84433 Summary: gcc 7 and before miscompile loop and remove exit due to incorrect range calculation Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/83911] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with target attribute on constructor in gimplify_expr at gimplify.c:11321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83911 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 43445 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43445=edit patch The problem here is that we're substituting a dispatcher function for a constructor, and the dispatcher

[Bug fortran/84432] [F08] Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Detect illegal component|[F08] Detect illegal

[Bug fortran/84389] Defined output: unexpected compiler error with the use of ":" edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/84412] [7/8 Regression] Erroneous "Inquire statement identifies an internal file" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84432] New: Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432 Bug ID: 84432 Summary: Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/84431] New: Suboptimal code for masked shifts (x86/x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84431 Bug ID: 84431 Summary: Suboptimal code for masked shifts (x86/x86-64) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/84430] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp simd in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430 Bug ID: 84430 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp simd in lambda Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp Severity:

[Bug c++/84429] New: [8 Regression] ICE capturing variable-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429 Bug ID: 84429 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE capturing variable-sized array Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84139] C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Di Bella --- It appears this is now compiling on trunk: https://godbolt.org/g/L9igrS. Thanks. Is it safe to close this issue yet?

[Bug target/84361] Fails to use vfmaddsub* for complex multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84361 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/82996] ICE and segfault with derived type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82996 --- Comment #9 from Neil Carlson --- With today's version (r257782) I'm still seeing the same thing Dominique reported in comment 7, except that there is no longer any abort -- the programs terminate successfully (0 exit code) despite the

[Bug fortran/84270] [7/8 Regression] optimization bug with assumed size array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79064] Cannot overload member function templates on type of literal

rors) Excess errors: /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20180217/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/overload15.C:14:10: error: call of overloaded 'f<0>(char (*)[1])' is ambiguous /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20180217/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/overload15.C:15:10: error: no matching function for call to 'f<0>(char (*)[7])'

[Bug fortran/84270] [7/8 Regression] optimization bug with assumed size array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 17 16:01:50 2018 New Revision: 257784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257784=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/84270] [7/8 Regression] optimization bug with assumed size array argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 17 15:53:07 2018 New Revision: 257783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257783=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84270

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #60 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #59) > Should be fixed on trunk, please test and confirm. Confirmed fixed on trunk. Many thanks. Could you please backport to gcc-7-branch and

[Bug fortran/84381] replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84094] several correctness issues in gfortran.dg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094 Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state. Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran testsuite https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/84381] replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #5) > Thomas, I saw you generated a patch with "stop n". I'd love to see how you > did it -- the regexp and counting magic. At first, I tried to find the

[Bug c++/84423] [concepts] ICE with invalid using declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423 --- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt --- I can still reproduce the crash with a clean trunk from 2 hours ago (r257780).

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk, thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 17 11:07:32 2018 New Revision: 257781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257781=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84115 *

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression][armeb] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/74600] [openacc] duplicate data map error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug target/70713] msp430 interrupt attribute prevents overriding weak symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug sanitizer/67899] build failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67899 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|