[Bug go/84765] "cmd/go/internal/work/buildid.go" breaks for various non-English locales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84765 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Thanks! For reference, the fix was r258565.

[Bug c/84888] C/C++: Improve wording of unclosed paren/brace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84888 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/84887] missing semicolon: further improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84887 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84789] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with broken variable declaration in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/78499] [OOP] ICE in gfc_typename, at fortran/misc.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78499 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69395] ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug fortran/78741] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/69395] ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/78741] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Mar 16 03:30:06 2018 New Revision: 258583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258583=gcc=rev Log: Commit ChangeLog entries for revision 258582. 2018-03-15 Steven G.

[Bug fortran/78741] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Mar 16 03:28:08 2018 New Revision: 258582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258582=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/69395] ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/78741] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/78741] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Mar 16 02:56:34 2018 New Revision: 258581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258581=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Hacker News user "earenndil" suggested: > What about a line of ─ in between different unassociated errors? > So if there is a group of related errors that are about the same actual > problem, or a note

[Bug fortran/69395] ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Mar 16 02:43:02 2018 New Revision: 258580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258580=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/84898] New: Fix-it hints for '.' vs '->'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84898 Bug ID: 84898 Summary: Fix-it hints for '.' vs '->' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84898] Fix-it hints for '.' vs '->'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84898 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Note how clang offers fix-it hints (we don't); I also prefer the clang wording.

[Bug c++/84897] Better handling of unqualified "string"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84897 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Rather we should not report the inline namespace __cx11 .I suspect you can come up with a shorter t estcase which does not use any includes.

[Bug c++/84897] New: Better handling of unqualified "string"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84897 Bug ID: 84897 Summary: Better handling of unqualified "string" Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Buettner --- Created attachment 43671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43671=edit GDB patch - dwarf2read.c I've attached the GDB patch that I'm currently testing. When I try it against either

[Bug c++/84896] New: Better handling of missing for std::pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84896 Bug ID: 84896 Summary: Better handling of missing for std::pair Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/84895] Smarter suggestions for "private" accessor hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84895 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c/84887] missing semicolon: further improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84887 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Similarly, in : int i int j; as of gcc 8 we now print: q.c:1:6: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘int’ int i ^ ; int j; ~~~ User "jancsika" on Hacker News points out: > [...] the output is

[Bug c++/84895] New: Smarter suggestions for "private" accessor hints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84895 Bug ID: 84895 Summary: Smarter suggestions for "private" accessor hints Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80886] __builtin_constant_p magic has broken at some point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80886 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.4.0 Version|unknown

[Bug rtl-optimization/78778] non-atomic load moved to before atomic load with std::memory_order_acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78778 --- Comment #4 from Erik Rigtorp --- Looks like this was fixed in trunk: https://godbolt.org/g/nxGRdm

[Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Example of Rust error (showing colorization): https://i.redd.it/qm4oceuuckyy.png

[Bug fortran/84894] New: [F2018] provide iso_fortran_binding.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84894 Bug ID: 84894 Summary: [F2018] provide iso_fortran_binding.h Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/41897] Support TS 29113: "Further Interoperability of Fortran with C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41897 --- Comment #3 from Damian Rouson --- With Fortran 2018 now in Committee Draft (CD) and likely to be published this year, it probably makes sense to close this bug report. Any features from TS 29113 that will be in Fortran 2018 have already

[Bug fortran/84885] c_char bind length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84885 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:57:08PM +, mdblack98 at yahoo dot com wrote: > > --- Comment #3 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com --- > I'll correct my reply in that using len > 1 outside of an interoperability

[Bug c++/84893] New: Rejects a valid code with variadic function template taking a function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84893 Bug ID: 84893 Summary: Rejects a valid code with variadic function template taking a function pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/82992] ICE in create_int_parameter_array, at fortran/module.c:6586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82992 --- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf --- The ICE on invalid is solved. The invalid code still needs to be detected. NAG complains: NAG Fortran Compiler Release 6.1(Tozai) Build 6106 Error: pr82992.f90, line 2: Name clash between dummy argument X

[Bug c++/84892] New: Missing accessor hint for private field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84892 Bug ID: 84892 Summary: Missing accessor hint for private field Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/84885] c_char bind length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84885 --- Comment #3 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com --- I'll correct my reply in that using len > 1 outside of an interoperability block is OK. So it is apparently now impossible to declare c_char len > 1 inside such a block? Mike

[Bug fortran/84885] c_char bind length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84885 --- Comment #2 from mdblack98 at yahoo dot com --- I got what's below from Steve Lionel of the FORTRAN working groupWith what he said you flat should NOT be able to say anything other than LEN=1 for c_char.  Whether it's in a type block or

[Bug c++/84891] New: -fno-signed-zeros leads to optimization which should be possible only if also -ffinite-math-only is on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84891 Bug ID: 84891 Summary: -fno-signed-zeros leads to optimization which should be possible only if also -ffinite-math-only is on Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status:

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 15 21:09:24 2018 New Revision: 258574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258574=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79085 * calls.c (expand_call): For TREE_ADDRESSABLE rettype

[Bug c/84890] New: Overly verbose notes for missing headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Bug ID: 84890 Summary: Overly verbose notes for missing headers Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug other/84889] New: Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 Bug ID: 84889 Summary: Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66672] std::is_same wrong result for captured reference value inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672 --- Comment #4 from Anders Schau Knatten --- Update: There's a related issue with Clang, in which Richard Smith makes a good argument: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35423#c2 He refers to

[Bug c/84888] C/C++: Improve wording of unclosed paren/brace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84888 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c/84888] New: C/C++: Improve wording of unclosed paren/brace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84888 Bug ID: 84888 Summary: C/C++: Improve wording of unclosed paren/brace Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81392] Improve diagnostics for [[fallthrough]] attribute that is missing a semicolon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81392 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/84887] New: missing semicolon: further improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84887 Bug ID: 84887 Summary: missing semicolon: further improvements Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, error-recovery Severity: normal

[Bug c++/65137] wrong line for missing semicolon after expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65137 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/82013] better error message for missing semicolon in prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Survey Invite] Take 8-min research survey and win a lottery ticket to compete for an Amazon $100 credit

I've invited you to fill out the following form: Professional Profile To fill it out, visit: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0w=1usp=mail_form_link Dear friend, I am a masters student in Computer Science at the Federal

[Bug other/44032] internals documentation is not legally safe to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44032 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libfortran/84880] [8 Regression] libgfortran fail to build on aarch64/arm 32bit cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/44033] The target hook documentation is chronically out-of-sync with the facts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44033 Bug 44033 depends on bug 44035, which changed state. Bug 44035 Summary: internals documentation cannot be fixed without new GFDL license grants https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035 What|Removed

[Bug c++/84222] [6/7 Regression] [[deprecated]] class complains about internal class usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84222 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] |[6/7 Regression]

[Bug other/44035] internals documentation cannot be fixed without new GFDL license grants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/84880] [8 Regression] libgfortran fail to build on aarch64/arm 32bit cross toolchain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 15 18:04:59 2018 New Revision: 258571 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258571=gcc=rev Log: PR libgfortran/84880 * intrinsics/kill.c (kill): Rename to...

[Bug target/84574] Function return thunks shouldn't be aliased to indirect branch thunks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84574 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Mar 15 17:54:40 2018 New Revision: 258569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258569=gcc=rev Log: i386: Don't generate alias for function return thunk Function return thunks

[Bug libstdc++/84886] New: Add static checking to library components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84886 Bug ID: 84886 Summary: Add static checking to library components Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/84222] [6/7/8 Regression] [[deprecated]] class complains about internal class usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84222 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 15 17:45:01 2018 New Revision: 258568 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258568=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84222 * cp-tree.h (cp_warn_deprecated_use): Declare.

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- My advice would be to create a new option Wreturn-pedantic. Make this option control the pedwarns that don't have any option. Then, enable it by default, but also make it be enabled by Wpedantic and

[Bug tree-optimization/84841] [7/8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in rewrite_expr_tree_parallel, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:4624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug go/84765] "cmd/go/internal/work/buildid.go" breaks for various non-English locales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84765 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84885] c_char bind length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84885 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/84882] -mstrict-align on aarch64 should not be RejectNegative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84882 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/44035] internals documentation cannot be fixed without new GFDL license grants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44035 --- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6) > Since we have docstring relicensing maintainers, I don't think this is an > issue now. Oops, that slipped my mind. Indeed, we can consider

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #2) > Sorry, my bad. It is easy to fix. I think the patch will be ready today. Unfortunately, this test also triggers more serious problem of my last patch

[Bug tree-optimization/84841] [7/8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in rewrite_expr_tree_parallel, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:4624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84841 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the other side, the assumption that +/* of two REAL_CSTs can be always folded isn't false just for -frounding-math, but also e.g. with IBM long double (aka composite mode) and no

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 --- Comment #6 from Dave Pagan --- Helpful update, Jonathan - did you want to follow up on this bug then? Or should I go ahead based on your new information?

[Bug c/39808] warn_unused_result fails to produce warning in a statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39808 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/84885] New: c_char bind length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84885 Bug ID: 84885 Summary: c_char bind length Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Created attachment 43668 [details] > gcc8-pr79085.patch > > Untested fix. That fixes the original testcase for me. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/84841] [7/8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in rewrite_expr_tree_parallel, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:4624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/84852] [8 Regression] ICE in calculate_line_spans, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:1105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84852 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Mar 15 15:39:46 2018 New Revision: 258559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258559=gcc=rev Log: Fix testcase for PR c/84852 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c/84852

[Bug tree-optimization/84811] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811 --- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su --- > Can you please attach content of --save-temps? $ gcctk -O3 -c --save-temps small.c during RTL pass: dse1 small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:12:1: internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at

[Bug c++/84884] New: [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 Bug ID: 84884 Summary: [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/84883] New: No warning when dereferencing an array as a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84883 Bug ID: 84883 Summary: No warning when dereferencing an array as a pointer Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/81575] [7/8 Regression] ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Eh, never mind the first hunk then.

[Bug c++/81575] [7/8 Regression] ICE on C++ code: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81575 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Like moving over a const call after the stores might cause us to spill across the call. Moving over any stmt could enlarge lifetimes enough to do that. Register lifetime could be so that we cannot

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84876] [8 Regression] ICE on invalid code in lra_assign at gcc/lra-assigns.c:1601 since r258504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84876 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Sorry, my bad. It is easy to fix. I think the patch will be ready today.

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] there are cases where ld64 is not able to determine correct atom boundaries from the output GCC currently produces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] Revision |[8 Regression] there are

[Bug tree-optimization/82491] UBSAN in gcc/gimple-fold.c:6187:6: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 * 8 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82491 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Thanks Richard! > > Now I still see the other issue in dwarf2out: > > Breakpoint 1, based_loc_descr (reg=0x751183a8, offset=..., >

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/84882] New: -mstrict-align on aarch64 should not be RejectNegative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84882 Bug ID: 84882 Summary: -mstrict-align on aarch64 should not be RejectNegative Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33315 --- Comment #7 from Richard

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 --- Comment #5 from Hein-Pieter van Braam --- I can build the file I reported #84881 on with the following extra options: -O3 -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-ccp -fno-code-hoisting -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-vrp

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #33 from Richard Biener --- The summary is now misleading as well. IMHO the bug shouldn't have been overloaded with the fallout of the original fix.

[Bug c/84873] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[6/7/8

[Bug debug/84875] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/84875] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84875 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, we have a function which conditionally bypasses the prologue and epilogue and just performs a tailcall, otherwise saves two registers (%r10 and %r11) into %f2 and %f0 registers, clobbers one of them

[Bug c++/79085] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/84873] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84873 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 15 13:10:24 2018 New Revision: 258556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258556=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-15 Richard Biener PR c/84873 *

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #41 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #40) > Well, your patch only replaces increments it can modify possibly > leaving uses unaltered. That's IMHO not good. > > Which is why I suggested to have

[Bug c++/79085] ICE with placement new to unaligned location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at tmm dot cx --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/84881] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when building for gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84881 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #40 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 > > --- Comment #39 from Aldy Hernandez --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from

[Bug c++/84881] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when building for gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84881 --- Comment #2 from Hein-Pieter van Braam --- Created attachment 43666 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43666=edit Result of the compilation with -fbugreport enabled

[Bug c++/84881] internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when building for gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84881 --- Comment #1 from Hein-Pieter van Braam --- I forgot to mention: The ICE doesn't happen when building for i686 or x86_64.

  1   2   >