[Bug c++/84983] New: [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/pr84828.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84983 Bug ID: 84983 Summary: [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/pr84828.C fail Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/84850] [8 Regression] -Wclass-memaccess on a memcpy in a copy assignment operator with no nontrivial bases or members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84850 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/82624] [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer dereferences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624 Orlando Arias changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/84660] Combine doing wrong optimization for 64 bits with SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660 --- Comment #7 from Kito Cheng --- Hi Jim: Thanks your update, we'll test that again, btw, we can also test on x86-64 and aarch64 if you have no time to test other target.

[Bug c/84982] New: logically inverting bools into local array results in bitwise negation

1} otherwise, as the non-merged not is a xor with 1. This happens on svn trunk as of today (8.0.1 20180319 (experimental)), the 8.0 provided by fedora (8.0.1 20180222 (Red Hat 8.0.1-0.16)), but does not happen on the arch gcc version (7.3.1 20180312). If I figure out how to bisect with SVN I mig

[Bug fortran/42651] Functions with result: Wrongly accepts attributes to function name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84660] Combine doing wrong optimization for 64 bits with SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84660 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilson at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/78818] msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/78818] msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozef.l at mittosystems dot com ---

[Bug fortran/42651] Functions with result: Wrongly accepts attributes to function name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42651 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/82624] [msp430] Target must allow for NULL pointer dereferences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82624 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozef.l at mittosystems dot com ---

[Bug c++/84981] C++17 allows function pointers with no linkage as template parameters but gcc errors, stating the function has no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And maybe also this for references as template arguments: --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -6259,7 +6259,8 @@ convert_nontype_argument_function (tree type, tree expr, } linkage =

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > It should work in C++17, but is not the subject of this bug report. That's now PR 84981. For this PR, the only remaining bug seems to be comment 8.

[Bug c++/84981] C++17 allows function pointers with no linkage as template parameters but gcc errors, stating the function has no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/84981] New: C++17 allows function pointers with no linkage as template parameters but gcc errors, stating the function has no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84981 Bug ID: 84981 Summary: C++17 allows function pointers with no linkage as template parameters but gcc errors, stating the function has no linkage Product: gcc

[Bug c++/52036] C++11 allows template parameters to have internal linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-01-29 00:00:00 |2018-3-19 --- Comment #13 from

[Bug fortran/84931] Expansion of array constructor with constant implied-do-object goes sideways

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84931] Expansion of array constructor with constant implied-do-object goes sideways

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 19 22:49:33 2018 New Revision: 258667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258667=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84931

[Bug c++/84980] [concepts] ICE with missing typename in cocept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980 --- Comment #1 from Volker Reichelt --- That's of course "-fconcepts" instead of "-fconcpets".

[Bug c++/84980] New: [concepts] ICE with missing typename in cocept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980 Bug ID: 84980 Summary: [concepts] ICE with missing typename in cocept Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84979] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto as template parameter and -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979 Bug ID: 84979 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto as template parameter and -fconcepts Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/49025] gfortran bug: Local variable does not hide generic procedure.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49025 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #3

[Bug c/84900] Compiler report a error unexpectedly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84900 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Yes, I'd consider this invalid code. Presumably there's some issue with the GNU extension allowing casts of structs to the same type, whereby in some cases it fails to make the result of

[Bug fortran/84931] Expansion of array constructor with constant implied-do-object goes sideways

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84931 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Mar 19 22:03:01 2018 New Revision: 258666 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258666=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84931

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 --- Comment #21 from Harald Anlauf --- I did not encounter any ICE with the test cases in this PR which I tried. Have they been fixed by Steve's recent patch?

[Bug c++/84978] ice in cxx_eval_constant_expression at gcc/cp/constexpr.c:4109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84978 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code: typedef struct { struct a *b; } c; typedef void (*d)(c *); typedef struct a { d e; int f; long g; } h; h i() { h j; ((c *)j.f)->b->e(0); return j; }

[Bug c++/84978] New: ice in cxx_eval_constant_expression at gcc/cp/constexpr.c:4109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84978 Bug ID: 84978 Summary: ice in cxx_eval_constant_expression at gcc/cp/constexpr.c:4109 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84811] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:355

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84811 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #25

[Bug c++/84977] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (build_x_unary_op())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84977 Bug ID: 84977 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (build_x_unary_op()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84937] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction and auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84937 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/84976] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (cp_build_modify_expr())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84976 Bug ID: 84976 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (cp_build_modify_expr()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84975] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (outer_binding()/lookup_name_real_1())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84975 Bug ID: 84975 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (outer_binding()/lookup_name_real_1()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84974] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (ovl_first()/location_of())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84974 Bug ID: 84974 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (ovl_first()/location_of()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84927] [7 Regression] ICE with NSDMI and reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regressiion] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug rtl-optimization/84643] gcc/optabs.c:6549:26: runtime error: load of value 131075, which is not a valid value for type 'memmodel'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 84946, which changed state. Bug 84946 Summary: [8 Regression] UBSAN: in mem_valid_for_store_merging ../../gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:3951 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946 What

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 84643, which changed state. Bug 84643 Summary: gcc/optabs.c:6549:26: runtime error: load of value 131075, which is not a valid value for type 'memmodel' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643 What

[Bug tree-optimization/84946] [8 Regression] UBSAN: in mem_valid_for_store_merging ../../gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:3951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/84761] AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8+ so far.

[Bug tree-optimization/84946] [8 Regression] UBSAN: in mem_valid_for_store_merging ../../gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:3951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84946 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 19 20:49:57 2018 New Revision: 258665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258665=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84946 * gimple-ssa-store-merging.c

[Bug c++/84973] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (tree_check()/ultimate_transparent_alias_target())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84973 Bug ID: 84973 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (tree_check()/ultimate_transparent_alias_target()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/78651] Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 19 20:48:39 2018 New Revision: 258664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258664=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78651 * dwarf2asm.c: Include fold-const.c.

[Bug sanitizer/84761] AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 19 20:47:29 2018 New Revision: 258663 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258663=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/84761 * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cc

[Bug rtl-optimization/84643] gcc/optabs.c:6549:26: runtime error: load of value 131075, which is not a valid value for type 'memmodel'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84643 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 19 20:46:23 2018 New Revision: 258662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258662=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84643 * memmodel.h (enum memmodel): Add

[Bug c++/84927] [7/8 Regressiion] ICE with NSDMI and reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84927 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Mar 19 20:46:16 2018 New Revision: 258661 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258661=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84927 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_bare_aggregate): Update

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- See Comment 4: why 2 errors?

[Bug c++/84925] [8 Regression] ICE with segfault in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84925 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84925] [8 Regression] ICE with segfault in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84925 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Mar 19 20:34:45 2018 New Revision: 258660 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258660=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84925 * pt.c (enclosing_instantiation_of): Check if fn is

[Bug c++/71834] [6/7/8 Regression] accepts invalid C++11 code with too few number of template arguments for class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 19 20:32:57 2018 New Revision: 258659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258659=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71834 - template-id with too few arguments. * pt.c

[Bug c++/71638] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu with -Wall (internal compiler error: non-constant element in constant CONSTRUCTOR)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71638 vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegard.nossum at oracle

[Bug c++/84644] internal compiler error: in warn_misplaced_attr_for_class_type, at cp/decl.c:4718

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84644 vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegard.nossum at oracle

[Bug c++/84905] Improve warning for __attribute__((const)) on function returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84905 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84972] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in extended_tree, at tree.h:5545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84972 Bug ID: 84972 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in extended_tree, at tree.h:5545 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot

[Bug c++/84971] New: internal compiler error: in build_non_dependent_expr, at cp/pt.c:25367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84971 Bug ID: 84971 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_non_dependent_expr, at cp/pt.c:25367 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84970] New: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15085

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84970 Bug ID: 84970 Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15085 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-3-19 Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/78651] Incorrect exception handling when catch clause uses local class and PIC and sanitizer are active

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78651 --- Comment #6 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Mon Mar 19 19:59:56 2018 New Revision: 258658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258658=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Maxim Ostapenko gcc/

[Bug tree-optimization/84969] New: [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84969 Bug ID: 84969 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong code with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c++/84968] New: internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs_expr, at cp/tree.c:1792

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84968 Bug ID: 84968 Summary: internal compiler error: in strip_typedefs_expr, at cp/tree.c:1792 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84967] New: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84967 Bug ID: 84967 Summary: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_array, at cp/typeck2.c:1324 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 vegard.nossum at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vegard.nossum at oracle

[Bug inline-asm/84966] New: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed (verify_gimple_in_cfg())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84966 Bug ID: 84966 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed (verify_gimple_in_cfg()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84965] New: internal compiler error: unexpected expression '__alignof__ (({...}))' of kind alignof_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84965 Bug ID: 84965 Summary: internal compiler error: unexpected expression '__alignof__ (({...}))' of kind alignof_expr Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug Duplication Problem] Survey Invite

I've invited you to fill out the following form: Professional Profile To fill it out, visit: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfQTZkrylE1t49gjzewPQSPWHFnPtGCZfRujg_G8VTwqGrbHg/viewform?c=0w=1usp=mail_form_link Dear friend, I am a masters student in Computer Science at the Federal

[Bug c++/84964] New: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 Bug ID: 84964 Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:4540 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/84963] New: [8 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84963 Bug ID: 84963 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2955 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/84962] New: internal compiler error: in get_fns, at cp/tree.c:2505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84962 Bug ID: 84962 Summary: internal compiler error: in get_fns, at cp/tree.c:2505 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity:

[Bug c++/84961] New: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961 Bug ID: 84961 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84960] New: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84960 Bug ID: 84960 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84959] New: internal compiler error: in store_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:6549 (store_binding()/store_class_binding())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84959 Bug ID: 84959 Summary: internal compiler error: in store_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:6549 (store_binding()/store_class_binding()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Well, okay then... Thanks!

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-03/msg00566.html : Author: vries Date: Mon Mar 19 19:12:53 2018 New Revision: 258656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258656=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Add nvptx xfail

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 19:14:06 2018 New Revision: 258657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258657=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/84908] retpoline weirdness: 7.3.0-1 and 4.8.5-16: with -fPIC: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `__x86_indirect_thunk_rax'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84908 --- Comment #8 from Jason Vas Dias --- Thanks for the clarification, and I hope the kernel developers stop compiling the mainline vDSO with -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register . But there are still a few things I am

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- I disagree, it is a well documented behavior and user gets exactly what he asked for. There is no questionable or problematic behavior with those options. It is not any different from strchr ("abcd", 'e')

[Bug c++/84835] [8 Regression] ICE in add_method, at cp/class.c:996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84835 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Mon Mar 19 18:56:22 2018 New Revision: 258655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258655=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/84835] ICE with generic lambda in extern "C"

[Bug c++/84835] [8 Regression] ICE in add_method, at cp/class.c:996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84835 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 18:54:29 2018 New Revision: 258654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258654=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #9 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sudi Date: Mon Mar 19 18:50:32 2018 New Revision: 258653 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258653=gcc=rev Log: [PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] New: int loads not eliminated against larger stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Bug ID: 84958 Summary: int loads not eliminated against larger stores Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/65453] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65453 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Mar 19 18:36:29 2018 New Revision: 258652 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258652=gcc=rev Log: 2018-03-19 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/84957] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84957 Bug ID: 84957 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_sym_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:2255 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/84956] New: ICE in replace_block_by, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84956 Bug ID: 84956 Summary: ICE in replace_block_by, at tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1546 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- WOW! That was quick! Note that strpbrk(p, "") is certainly worth a warning: in the original context the second parameter was the result from a macro substitution, that was far from obvious to spot, and

[Bug fortran/84955] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 Bug ID: 84955 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/84955] [7/8 Regression] ICE in substitute_and_fold_dom_walker, at tree-ssa-propagate.c:1089

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Configured with --enable-checking=yes : $ gfortran-8-20180318 -c z1.f90 -O2 -fopenacc during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg z1.f90:11:0: end internal compiler error: in operator[], at

[Bug c/84953] [6/7/8 Regression] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43710 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43710=edit gcc8-pr84953.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/84826] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/84856] Bootstrap failure on riscv: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84856 --- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Mon Mar 19 18:08:24 2018 New Revision: 258650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258650=gcc=rev Log: RISC-V: Fix bootstrap failure. gcc/ PR bootstrap/84856 *

[Bug middle-end/70359] [6/7/8 Regression] Code size increase for x86/ARM/others compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #42 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36) > WRT the division removal. That seems so profitable that a slight increase > in codesize is warranted. So if we fix the other issue and the source of > the

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/builtins.c.jj 2018-03-07 22:51:58.871478732 +0100 +++ gcc/builtins.c 2018-03-19 18:49:45.313898848 +0100 @@ -9573,7 +9573,7 @@ fold_builtin_strpbrk (location_t loc, tr if (p2[0] ==

[Bug c/84953] misleading warning from strpbrk(x,"")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84953 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for some tests compiled with -m32 after r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

  1   2   3   >