https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
Bug ID: 85060
Summary: Object cannot call its inherited member function
"without object"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80532
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew at wil dot cx
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85055
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63734
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7)
> > 5 branch is closed
>
> You closed the PR, so does that mean you checked and it is fixed at least on
> trunk?
I tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
--- Comment #37 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #36)
> I don't think this bug meets the definition of WAITING.
So what's the proper status for it then? SUSPENDED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83638
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85059
Bug ID: 85059
Summary: Compiling with -Og should preserve variable values
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85058
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The same page also says:
The following built-in function is available when -mfsgsbase is used. All of
them generate the machine instruction that is part of the name.
unsigned int __builtin_ia32_rdfsbase3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85058
Bug ID: 85058
Summary: Builtin-functions for -mbmi2 documented with wrong
names
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85007
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85007
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Mar 23 23:20:59 2018
New Revision: 258828
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258828&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/85007
* gnatlink.adb (Gnatlink): Remove handli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85036
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Mar 23 23:12:49 2018
New Revision: 258827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/85036
* gnatlink.adb (Process_Args): Drop exist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77941
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 22:03:51 2018
New Revision: 258824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - wrong SFINAE behavior.
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 22:03:51 2018
New Revision: 258824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - wrong SFINAE behavior.
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85057
Bug ID: 85057
Summary: GCC fails to vectorize code unless dummy loop is added
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It fails in C with this:
#pragma acc parallel loop tile(2,3)
for (i = 1; i < 10; i++)
for (j = 1; j < 10; j++)
for (;;)
;
It must be that empty loop that tripping up the oacc t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84942
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2018-03-19 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85022
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 20:55:40 2018
New Revision: 258823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258823&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/85022
* emit-rtl.c (init_emit_regs): Indicat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85015
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 20:54:50 2018
New Revision: 258822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85015
* decl.c (compute_array_index_type): Set osiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84942
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 23 20:54:01 2018
New Revision: 258821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84942
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) : Replace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 43745
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43745&action=edit
Tentative patch with testcase
(In reply to cesar from comment #1)
> Created attachment 43744 [details]
> WIP pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|dmalcolm a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|dmalcolm a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|dmalcolm a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85030
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Mar 23 19:31:00 2018
New Revision: 258820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-23 Vladimir Makarov
PR inline-asm/85030
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 43744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43744&action=edit
WIP patch
It looks like nvptx_assmeble_decl_begin ignores the array type information.
This patch reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83662
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84183
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Plank ---
I'm pretty sure I already had binutils updated to 2.30.
I will give it a try with a downgrade to 2.29.1 and check if gcc 7.3.0 builds
then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85056
Bug ID: 85056
Summary: [nvptx] wrong declaration of external arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #26 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83789
--- Comment #25 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Mar 23 17:48:58 2018
New Revision: 258819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2018-03-20 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84912
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85026
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Mar 23 16:43:43 2018
New Revision: 258818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[arm] PR target/85026: Fix ldrsh length estimate in Thumb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:00:45AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
>
> --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> When compiling the followin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 43742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43742&action=edit
Reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85050
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84979
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva ---
The patch has caused a number of tests in g++.dg/concepts to regress.
Looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84973
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84968
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Why would user-provided copy ctor matter? In this testcase there is no
> user-provided copy ctor, what matters is that the static cast is handled
> through
> p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85054
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84183
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Andre Pribil from comment #2)
Thanks. Sounds like this might be an ld bug then.
Thomas: do you know which version of binutils you were using?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84183
Andre Pribil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.pri...@beck-ipc.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60483
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |8.0
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84937
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80227
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84839
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84349
Bug 84349 depends on bug 84798, which changed state.
Bug 84798 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears
in a template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84647
Bug 84647 depends on bug 84798, which changed state.
Bug 84798 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) if `auto` appears
in a template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84355
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85005
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:06 2018
New Revision: 258814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78489
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:06 2018
New Revision: 258814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78489 - Substitution in wrong order
PR c++/84489
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84839
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:36 2018
New Revision: 258810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84839 - ICE with decltype of parameter pack.
* pt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:40:00 2018
New Revision: 258813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71834 - template-id with too few arguments.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84937
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:54 2018
New Revision: 258812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84937 - ICE with class deduction and auto.
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80227
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:47 2018
New Revision: 258811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80227 - SFINAE and negative array size.
* decl.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84798
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:30 2018
New Revision: 258809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84798 - ICE with auto in abstract function declarator.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:19 2018
New Revision: 258807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82336 - link error with list-init default argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84355
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 23 14:39:25 2018
New Revision: 258808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84355 - ICE with deduction for member class template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85055
Bug ID: 85055
Summary: warn on accessing free memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85053
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #11 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Fri Mar 23 13:57:28 2018
New Revision: 258805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix pr84826.c failure for thumb1
*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85054
Bug ID: 85054
Summary: gcc8 fail to identify template redeclaration - problem
in string header
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84943
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Ol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85053
Bug ID: 85053
Summary: free not listed as built-in
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60458
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85045
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 23 13:45:49 2018
New Revision: 258804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85045
* c-pretty-print.c (c_pretty_printer::mult
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Andrey, can you still reproduce and if yes, see what you get for the
sw_absorption.F90 loop after PRE (i.e. if the value of __builtin_pow (10, ...)
is precomputed for the first iteration and pow moved to lat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> Ah, I can actually reproduce the failure with the #c27 testcase with -Ofast
> -fno-tree-pre.
>
> So, to workaround this issue with SPEC, either we need to fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Tried to enlarge the testcase, so it better matches what sw_absorption.F90
does, but still it works with -Ofast, just not with -Ofast -fno-tree-pre:
! PR middle-end/82004
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options "-Of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84924
--- Comment #5 from Seth Johnson ---
That looks perfect, thank you for looking into this.
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Is the following patch OK?
>
>return false;
> }
>
> - if (!is_c_interoperable (fptr,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #28)
> So back to the constexpr __builtin_memcmp, or __constexpr_memcmp ideas.
>
> Though I still don't see how __constexpr_memcmp would make a difference wrt
> to nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85048
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz ---
Just opened PR85052 for tracking __builtin_convertvector support.
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo