[Bug target/85401] New: segfault building code for VAX

2018-04-13 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85401 Bug ID: 85401 Summary: segfault building code for VAX Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/85397] -mcet -fcf-protection doesn't work with label in nested function

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85397 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- builtin_longjmp has also the same issue as PR 85025. I fixed it on hjl/cet/master branch.

[Bug c++/85400] New: R_SPARC_TLS_*: invalid relocations generated for optimized builds on sparc

2018-04-13 Thread phantall at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 Bug ID: 85400 Summary: R_SPARC_TLS_*: invalid relocations generated for optimized builds on sparc Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/84737] [8 Regression] 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with r256888

2018-04-13 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737 --- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen --- Created attachment 43928 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43928=edit r256888 pcom dump So the difference appears to be occurring in predictive commoning. In the ipa-cp clone,

[Bug target/83402] PPC64 implementation of ./rs6000/emmintrin.h gives out of range for _mm_slli_epi32

2018-04-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83402 --- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Apr 13 23:13:40 2018 New Revision: 259380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259380=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Fix _mm_slli_epi{32,64} for shift values 16 through 31 and negative

[Bug target/85397] -mcet -fcf-protection doesn't work with label in nested function

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85397 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Please take a look at hjl/cet/master branch at https://github.com/hjl-tools/gcc/tree/hjl/cet/master I replaced builtin_setjmp_setup and builtin_longjmp with save_stack_nonlocal and restore_stack_nonlocal to save

[Bug rtl-optimization/79916] ICE in Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

2018-04-13 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79916 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Apr 13 22:55:16 2018 New Revision: 259379 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259379=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-13 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug tree-optimization/85360] FAIL: gfortran.dg/deallocate_stat.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (ICE)

2018-04-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85360 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85344] Constant constraint check sign extends unsigned constant input operands

2018-04-13 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85344 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #4) > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3) > > More worrying is that this code compiles without error when it should error > > out: > > > > void

[Bug target/85399] New: Redundant SSP clearing before rdssp

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85399 Bug ID: 85399 Summary: Redundant SSP clearing before rdssp Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug other/85398] g++ reports "array subscript is above array bounds" when it cannot be sure

2018-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85398 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, |

[Bug target/85397] -mcet -fcf-protection doesn't work with label in nested function

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85397 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 13 19:55:15 2018 New Revision: 259378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259378=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/85393 * except.h

[Bug rtl-optimization/85376] [8 Regression] wrong code with -Og -fno-dce -fgcse -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85376 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/85376] [8 Regression] wrong code with -Og -fno-dce -fgcse -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85376 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 13 19:39:11 2018 New Revision: 259377 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259377=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/85376 * simplify-rtx.c

[Bug other/85398] New: g++ reports "array subscript is above array bounds" when it cannot be sure

2018-04-13 Thread patrickdepinguin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85398 Bug ID: 85398 Summary: g++ reports "array subscript is above array bounds" when it cannot be sure Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/85397] New: -mcet -fcf-protection doesn't work with label in nested function

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85397 Bug ID: 85397 Summary: -mcet -fcf-protection doesn't work with label in nested function Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/82099] internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1186 when using a function pointer for templated predicate

2018-04-13 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-09-04 00:00:00 |2018-4-13 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/85396] New: _M_t._M_emplace_hint_unique

2018-04-13 Thread microprogs at mail dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85396 Bug ID: 85396 Summary: _M_t._M_emplace_hint_unique Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to acsawdey from comment #12) > This function is called from cp/semantics.c maybe_cleanup_point_expr() > > tree > fold_build_cleanup_point_expr (tree type, tree expr) > { > /* If the expression

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

2018-04-13 Thread acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 --- Comment #12 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- This function is called from cp/semantics.c maybe_cleanup_point_expr() tree fold_build_cleanup_point_expr (tree type, tree expr) { /* If the expression does not have side effects then we

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

2018-04-13 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/85365] -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

2018-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85365 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor

[Bug rtl-optimization/79985] ICE in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6580

2018-04-13 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79985 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Let's just back out my couple of patches to ipa-devirt.c. Nobody seems to care about PR ipa/83983 so I guess I no longer do either.

[Bug fortran/85364] -fopenmp should not put array in program on the stack

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85364 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/85395] [F03] private clause contained in derived type acquires spurious scope

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85395 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|private clause contained in |[F03] private clause

[Bug fortran/85395] private clause contained in derived type acquires spurious scope

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85395 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/85365] -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

2018-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85365 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/85395] New: [7/8] F03 private clause contained in derived type acquires spurious scope

2018-04-13 Thread c...@mnet-mail.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85395 Bug ID: 85395 Summary: [7/8] F03 private clause contained in derived type acquires spurious scope Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/85394] [8 Regression] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- libsanitizer/asan/asan_allocator.h 2017-10-19 13:20:58.926958939 +0200 +++ libsanitizer/asan/asan_allocator.h 2018-04-13 00:24:53.331985820 +0200 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ const uptr kAllocatorSpace =

[Bug sanitizer/85394] [8 Regression] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/85394] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fedora too.

[Bug sanitizer/85394] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug sanitizer/85394] New: Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

2018-04-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 Bug ID: 85394 Summary: Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43926 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43926=edit gcc8-pr85393.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually, PRE does the right thing; the ~S () call is in bb3 and there is EH edge from there to bb23, which has another EH predecessor, and PRE inserts the initialization of pseudo 123 in that bb23. Then

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/85388] Missing ENDBR after __morestack call

2018-04-13 Thread igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85388 --- Comment #5 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- I think it's the right place.

[Bug target/85388] Missing ENDBR after __morestack call

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85388 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/85388] config/i386/morestack.S is incompatible with CET

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85388 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- This works: diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 03e5c433574..324e2ec60fc 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -15242,7 +15242,13 @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

2018-04-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha --- Here's another one: long long int xa (long long int ae, int yr) { long long int b3 = ae / (!ae + 2); long long int mx = yr + 1.0; long long int em = 1 / mx / (yr + 2.0); return b3 + em; } %

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

2018-04-13 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini --- Indeed, Nathan, at some point I had that too. Or even seen_error () which we often use lately in such cases. If nobody objects I'll send a patchlet + testcase.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Index 6 (hash value 34; max distance 0) (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame) (const_int -64 [0xffc0])) scanning new insn with uid = 160. deleting insn with uid = 117. PRE: redundant insn 117

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, it is the pre pass already, in the dump it dumps the function with (set (reg:DI 108) (plus:DI (frame) (const_int -64))) and later on with (set (reg:DI 108) (reg:DI 123)), but the latter is incorrect.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking at cprop2 now, before that we have: (insn 74 73 75 13 (parallel [ (set (reg/f:DI 108) (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame) (const_int -64

[Bug libgcc/85388] config/i386/morestack.S is incompatible with CET

2018-04-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85388 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #2) > You are fixing 64bit part. There is similar place for 32bit > > movl-8(%ebp),%eax # Restore the last register. > > call

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

2018-04-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- I still can reproduce it as of r259224. % powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-8.0.0-alpha20180408 -v Using built-in specs.

[Bug c++/84733] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (check_local_shadow())

2018-04-13 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84733 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think assert (error_count || binding->type == decl) would be better.

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/83852] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in sel_redirect_edge_and_branch, at sel-sched-ir.c:5644 on 32-bit BE powerpc targets

2018-04-13 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83852 --- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev --- Author: abel Date: Fri Apr 13 10:24:02 2018 New Revision: 259373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259373=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/83852 * gcc.dg/pr83852.c: New testcase.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43925 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43925=edit gcc8-pr85393-test.patch Testcase in patch form.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/85393] New: [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85393 Bug ID: 85393 Summary: [8 Regression] Miscompilation with hot/cold partitioning starting with r254832 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgcc/61152] Missing GCC Runtime Library Exception in some files that are included in libgcc

2018-04-13 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61152 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- There have been a bunch of commits for this bug; is it fixed yet?

[Bug target/81685] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline-ns-2.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error) on darwin

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81685 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 85392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/85392] [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr82718-[12].c (internal compiler error) on darwin

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85392 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/85392] New: [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr82718-[12].c (internal compiler error) on darwin

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85392 Bug ID: 85392 Summary: [7/8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr82718-[12].c (internal compiler error) on darwin Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Ok so I have 6 pre-processed source files having in total ~40MB. Hope I can reduce that.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

2018-04-13 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgcc/85388] config/i386/morestack.S is incompatible with CET

2018-04-13 Thread igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85388 --- Comment #2 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- You are fixing 64bit part. There is similar place for 32bit movl-8(%ebp),%eax # Restore the last register. call*-12(%ebp) # Call our

[Bug rtl-optimization/83852] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in sel_redirect_edge_and_branch, at sel-sched-ir.c:5644 on 32-bit BE powerpc targets

2018-04-13 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83852 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/85389] posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85389 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/85326] `make check` fails with `--disable-bootstrap` and `--enable-languages=c`

2018-04-13 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85326 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Apr 13 09:14:32 2018 New Revision: 259369 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259369=gcc=rev Log: IBM Z: Get rid of target specific C++ testcase gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

2018-04-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- With following debug patch: diff --git a/gcc/ipa-devirt.c b/gcc/ipa-devirt.c index fa9380cce80..7d14a923b4d 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-devirt.c +++ b/gcc/ipa-devirt.c @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ add_type_duplicate

[Bug lto/85391] [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-4-13 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/85363] Throwing exception from member constructor (brace initializer vs initializer list)

2018-04-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85363 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- That implemented the rule that aggregates can't have NSDMIs. It started working in C++14 mode with r216750, which implements the C++14 rule that aggregates _can_ have NSDMIs. So the problem seems to be

[Bug tree-optimization/83991] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c fail

2018-04-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83991 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Apr 13 08:59:05 2018 New Revision: 259368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259368=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82965 PR tree-optimization/83991 *

[Bug tree-optimization/82965] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c starts failing after r254379

2018-04-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Apr 13 08:59:05 2018 New Revision: 259368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259368=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82965 PR tree-optimization/83991 *

[Bug target/71991] Inconsistency for __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) among LTO and non-LTO compilation

2018-04-13 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71991 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Apr 13 08:51:47 2018 New Revision: 259367 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259367=gcc=rev Log: PR lto/71991 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_can_inline_p): Allow safe

[Bug lto/85391] New: [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887

2018-04-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85391 Bug ID: 85391 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in add_type_duplicate, at ipa-devirt.c:1887 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- We aim to do GCC 8 rc1 in the middle of next week, I'm afraid if powerpcspe is still in this sorry state by then, then it is better to remove it and re-add when/if it is in better shape. Or at least

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 13 08:35:32 2018 New Revision: 259366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259366=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81657 * expr.h (enum block_op_methods): Add

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/85230] asan: false positives in kernel on allocas

2018-04-13 Thread dvyukov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85230 --- Comment #21 from Dmitry Vyukov --- I guess it just used my system binutils. Used to work before. I now used an older distribution to build it. Seems to work.

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

2018-04-13 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85390] New: possible missed optimisation / regression from 6.3 with conditional expression

2018-04-13 Thread vegard.nossum at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85390 Bug ID: 85390 Summary: possible missed optimisation / regression from 6.3 with conditional expression Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug sanitizer/85389] New: posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments

2018-04-13 Thread gabriel.ganne at mindmaze dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85389 Bug ID: 85389 Summary: posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

2018-04-13 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #83 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Fri Apr 13 08:02:15 2018 New Revision: 259364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259364=gcc=rev Log: Fix gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c with Solaris ld (PR lto/81968) PR lto/81968

[Bug fortran/85387] [8 Regression] incorrect output with optimization /= 0

2018-04-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85387 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/51628] __attribute__((packed)) is unsafe in some cases

2018-04-13 Thread dingcurie at icloud dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51628 --- Comment #51 from W.H. Ding --- (In reply to Sven from comment #49) > This doesn't work. The aligned attribute is for providing additional > alignment hints. The GCC documentation clearly states, that aligned can > increase the alignment. So

[Bug c/85365] -Wrestrict false positives with -fsanitize=undefined

2018-04-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85365 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,