ITALY SALAD BOWL

This is our website for the 34oz plastic bowls: please click it and see, https://cwrsl.en.alibaba.com/product/60634767456-802693463/34oz_Beauty_rose_shape_crystal_plastic_packing_lid_dessert_bowl_for_take_away.html?spm=a2700.icbuShop.prewdfa4cf.4.4f5865c4Bw0Aix Warm Regards， Jim

[Bug fortran/85138] [8/9 regression] ICE with generic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > *** Bug 85526 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment #6 in the duplicate provides additional information. Reprodcued here. Well, I

[Bug fortran/85526] [6/7/8/9 regression] ICE when calling a (pure) function from inside another pure function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85526 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85138] [8/9 regression] ICE with generic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85138 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mail at pietrodelugas dot it

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||me at adhokshajmishraonline dot in

[Bug c++/85554] GCC does not instantiate template function when only used as a function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85554 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/85527] [openacc] atomic_capture-1.{c,f90} undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85527 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Fri Apr 27 22:11:12 2018 New Revision: 259733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259733=gcc=rev Log: [openacc, testsuite] Fix undefined behaviour in atomic_capture-1.f90 2018-04-28

[Bug c++/85554] GCC does not instantiate template function when only used as a function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85554 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a dup of bug 64194.

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless loop when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 --- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson --- I suggest you handle the glibc patch. Note that you can probably also fix this by adding unwind direcives to _start to say that the return address is in x0. This would avoid the minor code size increase, but

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 20:32:53 2018 New Revision: 259731 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259731=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/85549 * ipa-cp.c (find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset):

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 20:32:18 2018 New Revision: 259730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259730=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/85549 * ipa-cp.c (find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset):

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 20:30:56 2018 New Revision: 259729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259729=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85553 * init.c (build_zero_init_1): For zero initialization

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless loop when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 --- Comment #5 from palmer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks Jim. This looks good to me, are you comfortable submitting glibc patches? If so then I'll commit it, otherwise I can send it out myself.

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 20:29:12 2018 New Revision: 259728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259728=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85553 * init.c (build_zero_init_1): For zero initialization

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless loop when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 --- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 44032 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44032=edit proposed glibc patch to fix the problem

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless loop when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 --- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson --- I figured out that I wasn't fully rebuilding and relinking all libraries while trying to debug this with printf, and that sent me down the wrong path. Trying this again, correctly, I see that we have a loop in

[Bug libgcc/84292] __sync_add_and_fetch returns the old value instead of the new value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84292 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Tobler --- Author: andreast Date: Fri Apr 27 19:14:05 2018 New Revision: 259722 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259722=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-27 Andreas Tobler Maryse

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 18:44:28 2018 New Revision: 259721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259721=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: add Solaris assembler syntax for gccgo

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Apr 27 18:39:18 2018 New Revision: 259720 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259720=gcc=rev Log: Don't offer suggestions for compiler-generated variables (PR c++/85515)

[Bug c++/85554] New: GCC does not instantiate template function when only used as a function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85554 Bug ID: 85554 Summary: GCC does not instantiate template function when only used as a function type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 18:01:00 2018 New Revision: 259719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259719=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: add Solaris assembler syntax for gccgo

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- I see. Then, my humble opinion (we got Jason in CC, anyway) is that if we are still hoping to have this fixed in 8.1.0 we should just go ahead with something rather straightforward like your tweak, otherwise

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2) > Thanks Jakub for looking into this. For sure, the whole fold and convert > machinery should not be necessary for something this simple, but, to be > honest,

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Thanks Jakub for looking into this. For sure, the whole fold and convert machinery should not be necessary for something this simple, but, to be honest, isn't immediately obvious to me why it does the wrong

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/85553] [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70808] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant for nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's now PR 85553

[Bug c++/85553] New: [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85553 Bug ID: 85553 Summary: [8/9 Regression] cannot list-initialize a variable of type std::nullptr_t Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/85545] [8 Regression] ICE with static_cast of pointer-to-member-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85545 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84691] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in poplevel_class, at cp/name-lookup.c:4430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84691 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression]|[6/7/8 Regression] internal

[Bug c++/84691] [6/7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in poplevel_class, at cp/name-lookup.c:4430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84691 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Apr 27 16:56:55 2018 New Revision: 259716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259716=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-04-27 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/70808] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant for nullptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70808 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- This causes a regression for: using T = decltype(nullptr); const constexpr T foo{}; np.cc:2:23: error: ‘(const T)nullptr’ is not a constant expression const constexpr T foo{}; ^

Database of NetApp end users list

Hello there, I would like to know if you are interested in acquiring NetApp Users List. Information fields: Names, Title, Email, Phone, Company Name, Company URL, Company physical address, SIC Code, Industry, Company Size (Revenue and Employee). If you are interested, let me know your

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, documentation --- Comment

[Bug other/35511] release scripts added release note to zlib/ChangeLog, not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85552] Adding curly braces to the declaration of a std::unique_ptr to a forward declared class breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85552 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC and EDG both reject this reduced version but Clang accepts it: template struct uptr { uptr() { } ~uptr() { static_assert(sizeof(T), "complete type"); } }; class S; class Compiles { uptr s;

[Bug c++/85552] Adding curly braces to the declaration of a std::unique_ptr to a forward declared class breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85552 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Any default member initializer has the same problem, not just a braced-init-list, i.e. all of these cause an error: class DoesntCompile { std::unique_ptr s{}; std::unique_ptr s =

[Bug c++/85552] Adding curly braces to the declaration of a std::unique_ptr to a forward declared class breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85552 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- I have posted the fix to the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg01236.html

[Bug c/43797] __attribute__((deprecated("message"))) produces unexpected messages in some cases.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43797 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug objc/53345] some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53345 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/85545] [8 Regression] ICE with static_cast of pointer-to-member-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85545 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 27 15:06:14 2018 New Revision: 259713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259713=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85545 - ICE with noexcept PMF conversion. * cvt.c

[Bug c++/85552] New: Adding curly braces to the declaration of a std::unique_ptr to a forward declared class breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85552 Bug ID: 85552 Summary: Adding curly braces to the declaration of a std::unique_ptr to a forward declared class breaks compilation Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1

[Bug c++/85545] [8 Regression] ICE with static_cast of pointer-to-member-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85545 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 27 15:00:53 2018 New Revision: 259712 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259712=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85545 - ICE with noexcept PMF conversion. * cvt.c

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/84362] [7/8/9 Regression] Auto-vectorization regression when accessing member variable through getter/accessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84362 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85450] ICE: invalid types in nop conversion during GIMPLE pass: ompexp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85450 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- This also breaks building libgcc with -mabi=ilp32, and the patch in #c8 fixes that.

[Bug middle-end/55185] Error generated on extern inline function which isn't called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55185 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/85548] Zero-initialization of padding bits of an aggregate class (class A) member of a non-aggregate class (class B) is not performed when B is value-initialized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85548 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4) > This is another stupid omission, I forgot that for by-reference aggregate > values, one has to check the agg_preserved of the jump function. > > diff --git

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- This is another stupid omission, I forgot that for by-reference aggregate values, one has to check the agg_preserved of the jump function. diff --git a/gcc/ipa-cp.c b/gcc/ipa-cp.c index

[Bug rtl-optimization/85551] No strength reduction of modulo and integer vision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85551 --- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen --- Hmm.. I appear to have made unsafe assumptions in the mod_opt cases. The first safe optimization version would then be: void mod_opt(int *a, int count, int stride, unsigned width) { int pos_opt = 0;

[Bug rtl-optimization/85551] No strength reduction of modulo and integer vision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85551 --- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen --- I also stumbled on this old motivating article when I tried googling the concept: http://publications.csail.mit.edu/lcs/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TM-600.pdf

[Bug rtl-optimization/85551] New: No strength reduction of modulo and integer vision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85551 Bug ID: 85551 Summary: No strength reduction of modulo and integer vision Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/85548] Zero-initialization of padding bits of an aggregate class (class A) member of a non-aggregate class (class B) is not performed when B is value-initialized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85548 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Why do you think padding should be initialized in any way?

[Bug libgcc/85532] crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85532 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Huh, I never expected types to have "locations" ;) I don't think we can use DW_OP_GNU_variable_value because the refered to DIE would be in another section. We could simply avoid splitting out those

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4

[Bug debug/85550] [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/85550] New: [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85550 Bug ID: 85550 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] -fdebug-types-section broken with DW_OP_addr in DW_AT_location Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug inline-asm/85546] GCC assumes volatile asm block returns same value in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85546 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44028|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/85549] [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 44028 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44028=edit Small self-contained test-case

[Bug ipa/85549] New: [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85549 Bug ID: 85549 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Infinite loop in ilmbase package Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgcc/85532] crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85532 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/85532] crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85532 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Apr 27 09:17:49 2018 New Revision: 259703 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259703=gcc=rev Log: PR85532, crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame PR

[Bug libgcc/85532] New: crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85532 Bug ID: 85532 Summary: crtend.o built without --enable-initfini-array has bad .eh_frame Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/82518] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 fails on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518 --- Comment #59 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Apr 27 08:56:02 2018 New Revision: 259700 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259700=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/82518: Return false in ARRAY_MODE_SUPPORTED_P for

[Bug target/85538] kortest for 32 and 64 bit masks incorrectly uses k0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85538 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz --- Some more observations: 1. The instruction sequence: kmovq %k1,-0x8(%rsp) vmovq -0x8(%rsp),%xmm1 vmovq %xmm1,%rax kmovq %rax,%k0 should be a simple `kmovq %k1,%k0` instead. 2. Adding

[Bug target/85512] [8/9 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Apr 27 08:48:49 2018 New Revision: 259699 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259699=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/85512: Tighten SIMD right shift immediate

[Bug c++/85548] New: Zero-initialization of padding bits of an aggregate class (class A) member of a non-aggregate class (class B) is not performed when B is value-initialized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85548 Bug ID: 85548 Summary: Zero-initialization of padding bits of an aggregate class (class A) member of a non-aggregate class (class B) is not performed when B is value-initialized.

[Bug fortran/85547] Run-time error: character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85547 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/85540] gcc/ada/init.c:1282: suspicious expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85540 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/85540] gcc/ada/init.c:1282: suspicious expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85540 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri Apr 27 08:05:44 2018 New Revision: 259698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259698=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/85540 * init.c (__gnat_handle_vms_condition): Add

[Bug ada/85540] gcc/ada/init.c:1282: suspicious expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85540 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/85546] GCC assumes volatile asm block returns same value in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85546 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think this is a misconception of what a volatile asm is. Volatile says there may be additional side-effects the asm performs - it does _not_ mean the output depends on more than the inputs. Note I can't

[Bug tree-optimization/85529] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85529 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 07:11:44 2018 New Revision: 259697 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259697=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85529 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c

[Bug tree-optimization/85529] [7/8/9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85529 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 27 07:09:51 2018 New Revision: 259696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259696=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85529 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c

[Bug c++/85545] [8/9 Regression] ICE with static_cast of pointer-to-member-function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85545 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/85539] x86_64: loads are not always narrowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85539 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/85410] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- Here's another snippet. gcc-8.0.0-alpha20180422 snapshot (r259553) w/ r259563 applied ICEs when compiling it for x86_64 w/ -O2 (-O3, -Os) -ftree-slp-vectorize -fschedule-insns -fsel-sched-pipelining