[Bug c/85563] [8 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm regression with __builtin_unreachable and GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85563 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c/85562] -Wsuggest-attribute=malloc misleads about "returning normally"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85562 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, documentation

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu*|powerpc-*-linux-gnu*,

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Do you think you could work out a patch that handles the various different cases?

[Bug lto/82229] GCC7's LTO underperforms compared to GCC6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82229 krzysio.kurek at wp dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44025|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/82037] Debian 8.8 powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu bootstrap breaks in stage1 with gcc/liblto_plugin.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82037 Dennis Clarke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85570] Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug driver/81523] -static -pie behaves differently depending on if --enable-default-pie is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81523 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alinshans at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/85564] Option "-static" affects the type of generated program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85564 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80962] No more access violation control after some declarations using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80962 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||okannen at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Testcase from Bug 78715 comment 0: template concept bool Dummy = true; template class example { template U> friend auto func(); }; class test { test() = default; }; int main() {

[Bug c++/78715] [concepts] Access specifiers ignored after concept declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78715 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcbrindle at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85555] Use of concepts gives access to private members.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67225] [concepts] Expression constraint with a constrained result turns off access checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67225 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tobias.bruell at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #41 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On April 29, 2018 1:51:58 PM GMT+02:00, "aph at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 > >--- Comment #40 from Andrew Haley ---

[Bug lto/85571] New: ltobootstrap miscompare with trunk and x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85571 Bug ID: 85571 Summary: ltobootstrap miscompare with trunk and x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug c++/85570] New: Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85570 Bug ID: 85570 Summary: Resolution of unqualified-id in member access involving templates fails Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85569] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 85568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/85568] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85568 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/85569] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 --- Comment #2 from Björn Fahller --- Created attachment 44039 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44039=edit Preprocessed version of tests.cpp

[Bug c++/85569] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 --- Comment #1 from Björn Fahller --- Created attachment 44038 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44038=edit Test program exposing the bug

[Bug c++/85569] New: is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 Bug ID: 85569 Summary: is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/85568] New: is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85568 Bug ID: 85568 Summary: is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/85507] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/85507] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > The ICE is gone if I revert the change in dependency.c from r259385. > > This regtests cleanly. Well, it regtests cleanly, but produces

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #40 from Andrew Haley --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #29) > Note I repeatedly said this part of the standard is just stupid. It makes > most if not all type-based alias analysis useless. I don't think so. It does

[Bug testsuite/85527] [openacc] atomic_capture-1.{c,f90} undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85527 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > Should be fixed on tip, requested permission to backport to GCC 8 branch. It's fixed on sparc, but the Solaris/x86 with as failures remain

[Bug testsuite/85527] [openacc] atomic_capture-1.{c,f90} undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85527 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Sun Apr 29 10:26:56 2018 New Revision: 259748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259748=gcc=rev Log: [openacc, testsuite] Fix undefined behaviour in atomic_capture-1.c 2018-04-29

[Bug fortran/85507] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The ICE is gone if I revert the change in dependency.c from r259385. This regtests cleanly.

[Bug fortran/85565] LEN() intrinsic returns zero when given a zero-sized constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85565 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85566] LEN() intrinsic returns zero when given zero-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85566 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85565] LEN() intrinsic returns zero when given zero-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85565 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 85566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/85567] New: internal compiler error: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5797 when using sincos()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85567 Bug ID: 85567 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5797 when using sincos() Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED