[Bug c/82914] 'struct __attribute__ ((aligned (N))) s' ignores 'aligned' attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82914 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > (In reply to Paul Eggert from comment #4) > > Here, GCC says the alignment of 'b' is 1, not 8. What happened to the > > attribute? > > GCC silently drops it,

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

pr85852-1.c: In function 'ki': pr85852-1.c:4:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault double zo = 1.1 * nq - nq; ^~ 0xc9b59f crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20180520/work/gcc-9-20180520/gcc/toplev.c:325 0xa95733 contains_struct_check(tree_node

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

- mo; ~~~^~ 0xc9b59f crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.0.0_alpha20180520/work/gcc-9-20180520/gcc/toplev.c:325 0xa95733 contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char const*, int, char const*) /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Thank you for your interest in the MMIX port. (In reply to Wilco from comment #3) > (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1) > > > #define MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_SAVED_EH_RETURN_ADDRESS

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 21 03:53:00 2018 New Revision: 260432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260432=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85843 - warning in logic_error copy constructor. *

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/66694] Failure in function returning an allocated CHARACTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66694 --- Comment #9 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Thanks! -Original Message- From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 6:00 AM To: urbanj...@comcast.net Subject: [Bug fortran/66694]

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 11:50:54PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 > > Jonathan Wakely changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug c++/85848] Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sun May 20 23:50:08 2018 New Revision: 260427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260427=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85843 fix "should be explicitly initialized" warnings PR

[Bug fortran/85851] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_structure Segmentation fault at trans-expr.c:7810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85851 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #11 from Angus Gibson --- Apologies if this is unrelated to the issue at hand (I don't quite understand how everything is inter-related yet), but maybe it helps. First up, here's what valgrind says about the segfault: ...

[Bug fortran/85851] New: trunk 260152 ICE in gfc_conv_structure Segmentation fault at trans-expr.c:7810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85851 Bug ID: 85851 Summary: trunk 260152 ICE in gfc_conv_structure Segmentation fault at trans-expr.c:7810 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will see if I can reproduce this here with you example and if so will get on it.

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich --- An observation (does not pretend to be a fix) to make gcc compile standard library and be able to build runnable hello world on gcc master: 1. MMIX_CFUN_NEEDS_SAVED_EH_RETURN_ADDRESS can be unoptimised

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:27:28PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- > i.e. there's no invalid C++ at all, you're just asking for all warnings to > break your

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, thanks! I'd be very interested in hearing what you discover.

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #16 from Timothy Pearson --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #15) > PHP's reliance on frequent indirect branches makes it essentially the worst > case for this sort of thing. When Spectre v2 CVE mitigations are in place > for

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- PHP's reliance on frequent indirect branches makes it essentially the worst case for this sort of thing. When Spectre v2 CVE mitigations are in place for user code, you will see performance issues on all

[Bug c/85850] [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- So is there a quick workaround for this?

[Bug c/85850] [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- In libcpp/system.h, is included too late, after messing with macros, it should move earlier with the other includes. We could probably also avoid #defining true/false in C++ (just a warning).

[Bug bootstrap/82091] [5 only] Build failure on macOS 10.13 with Xcode 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82091 --- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter --- I do see this error now also with the trunk version [r260425] under Darwin 17.5 with Xcode 9.3.1.

[Bug c/85850] New: [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 Bug ID: 85850 Summary: [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85537] [7/8/9 Regression] Invalid memory reference at runtime when calling subroutine through procedure pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > However I don't see any failures with this variant: Sorry, I was a bit too quick in submitting this. It's really not a good example, since it's missing an

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #14 from Timothy Pearson --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #13) > This was prototyped and measured against the firmware fixes with > indistinguishable results. So the complexity of a software solution, with > its impacts on

[Bug c++/85848] Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 --- Comment #4 from Tom Westerhout --- A few configurations on which the attached example fails to compile: $ g++-6 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++-6 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug c++/85848] Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 --- Comment #3 from Tom Westerhout --- Created attachment 44153 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44153=edit Preprocessed source Result after preprocessing test.cpp

[Bug c++/85848] Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 --- Comment #2 from Tom Westerhout --- Created attachment 44152 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44152=edit Sample code triggering the error

[Bug fortran/80657] [7/8/9 Regression] Loop in character function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657 --- Comment #10 from Vittorio Zecca --- Just applied the fix: gfortran delivers an error message and exits. In 10 milliseconds! Thank you for fixing this one.

[Bug c++/85848] Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/85843] warning: base class ‘class std::exception’ should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Component|bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/85843] Invalid C++ in libstd++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Severity|blocker

[Bug bootstrap/85843] Invalid C++ in libstd++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85843 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85842] [8/9 Regression] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c++/85842] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49636] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct confused with slightly complicated case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 49636, which changed state. Bug 49636 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct confused with slightly complicated case https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 Nicolas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44106|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/80657] [7/8/9 Regression] Loop in character function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82275] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid reference to dimension-remapped type SELECT TYPE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80657] [7/8/9 Regression] Loop in character function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 18:08:04 2018 New Revision: 260424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260424=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80657

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- This was prototyped and measured against the firmware fixes with indistinguishable results. So the complexity of a software solution, with its impacts on Linux distributions, was not warranted. (That is,

[Bug fortran/82275] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid reference to dimension-remapped type SELECT TYPE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 17:16:09 2018 New Revision: 260423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260423=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82275

[Bug libstdc++/85845] [9 Regression] Many libstdc++ test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85845 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/85834] [9 regression] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code: typedef long unsigned a; extern "C" void *memset(void *, int, a); typedef struct b c; enum d { e }; template class f { public: template f(g); }; typedef f<1, long> h;

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > If I am not mistaken (problem with the change log entry), the patch in > comment 5 has been included in revision r260414 (pr49636). Yes, you are right. I

[Bug c++/72769] ifstream Optimed Out ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72769 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/28689] Cross compile internal error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28689 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85829] [8/9 Regression] PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY and MOVX were disabled for Haswell and newer processors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85829 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > > So I would suggest to revisit PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY wrt PARTIAL_REG_STALL > for Haswell+ We should do that for GCC 9. For GCC 8, we should restore what we had

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #4 from Joshua Cogliati --- And to replicate it with the simple program: gfortran -Wall -g -o simple simple.f90 valgrind --leak-check=full ./simple and you get things like: ==19171== 323 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in

[Bug tree-optimization/85834] [9 regression] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85834] ice in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3396

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85834 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug bootstrap/85849] [9 Regression] -O3 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85849 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #3 from Joshua Cogliati --- Created attachment 44150 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44150=edit simple program to demonstrate problem

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 Joshua Cogliati changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---

[Bug fortran/85786] [8/9 Regression] Segfault in associated intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85786 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- If I am not mistaken (problem with the change log entry), the patch in comment 5 has been included in revision r260414 (pr49636).

[Bug bootstrap/85849] [9 Regression] -O3 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85849 --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On May 20, 2018 2:53:31 PM GMT+02:00, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85849 > >Bug ID: 85849 >

[Bug bootstrap/85849] New: [9 Regression] -O3 bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85849 Bug ID: 85849 Summary: [9 Regression] -O3 bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > This PR could probably merged with pr85839. They're somewhat related, but I opened two separate PRs on purpose!

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #57 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Andrew, could you refresh your patch for the current trunk branch? It doesn't fully apply for me.

[Bug c++/85848] New: Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85848 Bug ID: 85848 Summary: Incorrect handling of explicit casting to move-only types Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80657] [7/8/9 Regression] Loop in character function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 11:12:53 2018 New Revision: 260419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260419=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80657

[Bug fortran/49636] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct confused with slightly complicated case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 11:07:44 2018 New Revision: 260418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260418=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/49636

[Bug fortran/82275] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid reference to dimension-remapped type SELECT TYPE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 11:04:14 2018 New Revision: 260417 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260417=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82275

[Bug fortran/82275] gfortran rejects valid & accepts invalid reference to dimension-remapped type SELECT TYPE selector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82275 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 10:54:24 2018 New Revision: 260416 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260416=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82275

[Bug fortran/83146] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE statement with associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83146 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/82923] Automatic allocation of deferred length character using function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- > > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_type_42.f90 > Modified: > trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Sorry, this last was

[Bug fortran/80657] [7/8/9 Regression] Loop in character function declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80657 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 10:08:24 2018 New Revision: 260415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260415=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80657 *

[Bug fortran/49636] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct confused with slightly complicated case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 10:04:46 2018 New Revision: 260414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260414=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/49636 *

[Bug fortran/66694] Failure in function returning an allocated CHARACTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66694 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 09:59:54 2018 New Revision: 260413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260413=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82923 PR

[Bug fortran/82923] Automatic allocation of deferred length character using function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 09:59:54 2018 New Revision: 260413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260413=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82923 PR

[Bug fortran/82617] Internal compiler error in expand_expr_real_1 when compiling the attached file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82617 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 20 09:59:54 2018 New Revision: 260413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260413=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82923 PR

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Created attachment 39731 [details] > > Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767 > > please send this patch to gcc-patches for review This patch has never been intended to be

[Bug libstdc++/85845] [9 Regression] Many libstdc++ test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85845 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|