[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018 New Revision: 260802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018 New Revision: 260802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug libstdc++/85930] [8/9 Regression] Misaligned reference created in shared_ptr_base.h with -fno-rtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/85930] Misaligned reference created in shared_ptr_base.h with -fno-rtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85940] New: Address of label breaks ISO C++ program despite non-GNU dialect and pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85940 Bug ID: 85940 Summary: Address of label breaks ISO C++ program despite non-GNU dialect and pedantic Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/85918] Conversions to/from [unsigned] long long are not vectorized for AVX512DQ target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat May 26 22:04:50 2018 New Revision: 260797 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260797=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85918 * config/i386/i386.md (fixunssuffix,

[Bug target/85939] New: -mstackrealign does not realign stack with local __m64 variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939 Bug ID: 85939 Summary: -mstackrealign does not realign stack with local __m64 variable Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug web/85917] GCC 8 Changes page fails to mention change of default mode for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85917 --- Comment #2 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --- Even such minor changes could be mentioned in that page for completeness.

[Bug target/85915] -mfunction-return=thunk causes multiple definition of `__x86_return_thunk'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915 --- Comment #7 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --- Ebuild for GCC 7 branch is not available in Gentoo. I guess that the relevant commit is: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=258647

[Bug objc/50909] Process "#pragma options align=reset" correctly on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909 Rudolf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rudolf.chrispens at web dot de --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/58372] internal compiler error: ix86_compute_frame_layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372 martchus at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martchus at gmx dot net ---

[Bug fortran/85938] New: Spurious assert failure for matmul with reshaped array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85938 Bug ID: 85938 Summary: Spurious assert failure for matmul with reshaped array Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. I think this should be backported as it is a regression I think on 7 and 8 branches.

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk. If anyone thinks this should be backported as a regression, let me know.

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran/85906 * io/write.c (write_integer): Initialise the fnode format to FMT_NONE, used for list directed write.

[Bug middle-end/85933] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/p8.c -O3 -finline-functions (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85933 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85933] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/p8.c -O3 -finline-functions (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85933 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment

[Bug ada/85937] [9 Regression] Failures in the Ada tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85937 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat May 26 17:30:52 2018 New Revision: 260793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260793=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug ada/85937] New: [9 Regression] Failures in the Ada tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85937 Bug ID: 85937 Summary: [9 Regression] Failures in the Ada tests Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug fortran/85840] Memory leak in write.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Joshua Cogliati from comment #9) --- snip --- > I could look into either method of fixing this if you want. (And for what > it is worth, I do have copyright assignment paperwork from both

[Bug target/85918] Conversions to/from [unsigned] long long are not vectorized for AVX512DQ target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 44189 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44189=edit gcc9-pr85918-2.patch WIP fix for the rest, still need to write testcases and actually test it.

[Bug target/85900] [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85345] Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sat May 26 11:35:31 2018 New Revision: 260792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260792=gcc=rev Log: Don't check ifunc_resolver on error Since ifunc_resolver isn't set when an

[Bug target/85900] [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sat May 26 11:35:31 2018 New Revision: 260792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260792=gcc=rev Log: Don't check ifunc_resolver on error Since ifunc_resolver isn't set when an

[Bug target/85900] [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This patch fixes the ICE and related problems I have spotted. Full testing > in progress. Back to "normal"!

[Bug bootstrap/85921] /gcc/c-family/c-warn.c fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/85921] /gcc/c-family/c-warn.c fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat May 26 06:56:41 2018 New Revision: 260791 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260791=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/85921 * c-warn.c (diagnose_mismatched_attributes):

[Bug bootstrap/85921] /gcc/c-family/c-warn.c fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat May 26 06:40:50 2018 New Revision: 260790 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260790=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/85921 * c-warn.c (diagnose_mismatched_attributes):

[Bug c++/85936] New: GCC incorrectly implements [expr.prim.lambda.capture]/10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85936 Bug ID: 85936 Summary: GCC incorrectly implements [expr.prim.lambda.capture]/10.2 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal