[Bug target/86005] [RISCV] Invalid intermixing of __atomic_* libcalls and inline atomic instruction sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86005 --- Comment #10 from James Y Knight --- I suppose since it doesn't affect most common platforms, nobody's noticed the brokenness yet? ARM is probably the most common architecture which is missing atomics on common CPU models, but when targeting

[Bug c++/86098] canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86098] canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 13 03:33:06 2018 New Revision: 261536 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261536=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86098 - ICE with template placeholder for TTP. * typeck.c

[Bug c++/86098] canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86098 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/66240] RFE: extend -falign-xyz syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug gcov-profile/83878] Line hit counts are sometimes wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83878 --- Comment #2 from Marco Castelluccio --- Created attachment 44267 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44267=edit Archive with GCNO, GCDA, source file and GCOV output Sorry for replying late, but I just managed to find a

[Bug c/86125] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/86125] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- It looks like this is on purpose. match_builtin_function_types, the function that determines whether a declaration of a built-in matches its expected type, has the following comment: /* Subroutine of

[Bug libstdc++/86127] New: STL containers do not satisfy container.requirements.general clause 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86127 Bug ID: 86127 Summary: STL containers do not satisfy container.requirements.general clause 8 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/86107] [9 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:42301 with -O -funroll-loops -mavx5124fmaps -mmitigate-rop --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/86114] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimple_fold_builtin_strlen with an invalid call to strnlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86114 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug debug/86064] [8/9 Regression] compiling Linux kernel: Error: can't resolve `.text.unlikely' {.text.unlikely section} - `.LVL43x' {.text section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 44266 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44266=edit candidate patch Here's the patch I'm testing

[Bug c++/86126] New: Note when linking libraries built with different -std options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86126 Bug ID: 86126 Summary: Note when linking libraries built with different -std options Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86060] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE at on with "c++03" in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85815] [7/8/9 Regression] incorrect "invalid use of incomplete type" in a lambda on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86060] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE at on with "c++03" in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 12 19:53:02 2018 New Revision: 261523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261523=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/86060 - ICE on range for with -std=c++98. * parser.c

[Bug c++/85815] [7/8/9 Regression] incorrect "invalid use of incomplete type" in a lambda on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 12 19:53:10 2018 New Revision: 261524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261524=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85815 - reference to member of enclosing template. *

[Bug c++/85807] [8/9 Regression] ICEs related to noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85807 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/86064] [8/9 Regression] compiling Linux kernel: Error: can't resolve `.text.unlikely' {.text.unlikely section} - `.LVL43x' {.text section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva --- In (i), that loclist format is used because of -gsplit-dwarf, I meant to say. So we have 3 possible work-arounds immediately available: not using -gsplit-dwarf, not disabling VTA, and disabling locviews.

[Bug c/86125] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic See Also|

[Bug c/86125] New: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125 Bug ID: 86125 Summary: missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/86064] [8/9 Regression] compiling Linux kernel: Error: can't resolve `.text.unlikely' {.text.unlikely section} - `.LVL43x' {.text section}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/85764] [8/9 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85764 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85765] [8/9 Regression] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59002] [meta-bug] Access checking in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002 Bug 59002 depends on bug 61806, which changed state. Bug 61806 Summary: [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 What|Removed

[Bug c++/61806] [C++11] Expression sfinae w/o access gives hard error in partial template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61806 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86048] [8/9 Regression] .seh_savexmm offset is negative error when compiling libpng

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86048 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Starke --- The error does not occur if I pass -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition.

[Bug other/78068] warning: implicit declaration of function ‘time’; did you mean ‘nice’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78068 Bug 78068 depends on bug 69968, which changed state. Bug 69968 Summary: RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 What|Removed

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/86124] New: [9 Regression] ICE in create_variable_info_for, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86124 Bug ID: 86124 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in create_variable_info_for, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6123 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jun 12 18:28:37 2018 New Revision: 261521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261521=gcc=rev Log: spellcheck: support transpositions aka Damerau-Levenshtein (PR other/69968)

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jun 12 18:28:25 2018 New Revision: 261520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261520=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/44491 * expr.c

[Bug c/86123] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86123 Bug ID: 86123 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3967 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/86122] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86122 Bug ID: 86122 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:21:06PM +, gs...@t-online.de wrote: > > --- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #4 and #5) > > trunk can now compile this code. > Confirming that

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #6 from G.

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 --- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jun 12 18:19:03 2018 New Revision: 261519 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261519=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/44491 *

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8/9 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jun 12 18:05:13 2018 New Revision: 261518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261518=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85259 - Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jun 12 18:05:05 2018 New Revision: 261517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261517=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/44491 * expr.c

[Bug middle-end/86121] [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy followed by strcat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/86121] [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy followed by strcat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Martin

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jun 12 17:55:24 2018 New Revision: 261516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261516=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-12 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/44491 * expr.c

[Bug middle-end/86121] New: [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy followed by strcat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86121 Bug ID: 86121 Summary: [9 Regression] missing -Wstringop-overflow on strcpy followed by strcat Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/85931] -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncpy with size of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85931 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Known to fail|9.0

[Bug c/85931] -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncpy with size of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85931 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jun 12 17:14:31 2018 New Revision: 261515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261515=gcc=rev Log: PR c/85931 - -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess for strncpy with size of source

[Bug fortran/86120] New: SIGSEGV without backtrace when using submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120 Bug ID: 86120 Summary: SIGSEGV without backtrace when using submodules Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/85990] Wrong TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85990 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jun 12 15:35:22 2018 New Revision: 261501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261501=gcc=rev Log: Linux/x86: Update TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET comments Glibc 2.18 was

[Bug target/85990] Wrong TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85990 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58646] ICE on a multidimensional VLA with an empty initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646 Andrey Vihrov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.vihrov at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/86118] Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/33979] support for char16_t, char32_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86119] New: Intrinsic len has wrong type if used within select type for a class(*) string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86119 Bug ID: 86119 Summary: Intrinsic len has wrong type if used within select type for a class(*) string Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libitm/85988] Incorrect offsets of __private_tm and pointer_guard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85988 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jun 12 11:08:52 2018 New Revision: 261491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261491=gcc=rev Log: libitm/x86: Correct offsets of __private_tm and pointer_guard In glibc,

[Bug c++/86118] Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118 --- Comment #2 from Александр Кроль --- Created attachment 44263 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44263=edit second volume of preprocessed file Due to size limit following command sequence was done: 1. bzip2 -k ./idfs.ii 2.

[Bug c++/86118] Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118 --- Comment #1 from Александр Кроль --- Created attachment 44262 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44262=edit preprocessed file that triggers the bug Due to size limit following command sequence was done: 1. bzip2 -k

[Bug c++/86118] New: Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86118 Bug ID: 86118 Summary: Gcc segfault for big c++ data compilation Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/86117] New: bogus warning maybe-uninitialized with class(*) and source argument in allocate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86117 Bug ID: 86117 Summary: bogus warning maybe-uninitialized with class(*) and source argument in allocate Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/86107] [9 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:42301 with -O -funroll-loops -mavx5124fmaps -mmitigate-rop --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.sandiford at linaro dot or

[Bug debug/84342] Location views breaks cross builds of arm including gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342 --- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12) > I'm not familiar enough with the ccfsm bits to know if there's something we > ought to be doing generically to improve CC handling further. I think >

[Bug target/86107] [9 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:42301 with -O -funroll-loops -mavx5124fmaps -mmitigate-rop --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- For some reason, this part of x86_mitigate_rop: int n_uses; reg_class superclass = regrename_find_superclass (head, _uses, ); old_reg

[Bug fortran/86116] New: Ambiguous generic interface not recognised

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86116 Bug ID: 86116 Summary: Ambiguous generic interface not recognised Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/33979] support for char16_t, char32_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug gcov-profile/86109] [8/9 Regression] gcov reports lines in lambdas as not executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86109 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86107] [9 Regression] ICE: in ix86_mitigate_rop, at config/i386/i386.c:42301 with -O -funroll-loops -mavx5124fmaps -mmitigate-rop --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86107 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86115] New: move_alloc for class(*) containing value of type character(len=*) looses data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86115 Bug ID: 86115 Summary: move_alloc for class(*) containing value of type character(len=*) looses data Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: