https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jul 13 05:25:47 2018
New Revision: 262622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262622=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-07-13 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor ---
In areas where the authors of the proposal find the standard open to
interpretation and when they feel it doesn't contradict the surveyed
implementation practice they tend to suggest to tighten the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #8 from Matt Bentley ---
> This is incorrect for floating point types and non scalars. And it
> introduces an extra check at runtime if value is not known to compile time.
This is the overload for scalar types, read the function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Matt Bentley from comment #6)
> Suggested patch for libstdc++, std_algobase.h, line 688:
> template
> inline typename
> __gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_scalar<_Tp>::__value, void>::__type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #6 from Matt Bentley ---
Suggested patch for libstdc++, std_algobase.h, line 688:
template
inline typename
__gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_scalar<_Tp>::__value, void>::__type
__fill_a(_ForwardIterator __first,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #21 from Davin McCall ---
Looking at this further, the proposal actually states, for the address-of
operator:
> When the operand designates an object, the result has the single provenance
> of the outermost object containing that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86510
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jul 12 22:42:00 2018
New Revision: 262609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262609=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/86510 - test case g++.dg/warn/pr86453.C fails starting with
r262596
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86510
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86511
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alphaev68-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86511
Bug ID: 86511
Summary: Unordered comparisons are expanded with branchless
code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86503
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You run out of memory or stack. Try ulimit -s unlimited
Yes but that seems to be because GCC goes into an infinte recursive
instantiation, which it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86507
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to tower120 from comment #0)
> All 7.x with
> "experimental/filesystem" worked fine.
Are you sure about that? You might be able to include the header, but nothing
else works.
Anyway, this is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86510
Bug ID: 86510
Summary: [9 regression] test case g++.dg/warn/pr86453.C fails
starting with r262596
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Ops, no, the above is with gcc-7.3.
gcc-9 correctly emits:
x.0_1 ={v} x;
_2 = x.0_1 u<=
1.79769313486231570814527423731704356798070567525844996599e+308;
_3 = (int) _2;
i ={v} _3;
_4 = fetestexcept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86490
--- Comment #9 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
It is worth studying what gold is doing, because it's not just skipping the
object files in the archives.
If you link with
gcc -flto -save-temps -fuse-ld=gold -o x main.o libfoo.a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
Bug ID: 86509
Summary: Invalid conversion of comparison with infinity
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86508
Bug ID: 86508
Summary: missing -Wattributes on an ignored attempt to reduce
struct alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Summary|[6,7,8,9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Will Hawkins from comment #5)
> I am using this as a jumping-off point to get involved with contributing
> code to gcc. I have nothing to offer yet, but I wanted to note here that I
> am going
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 16:33:26 2018
New Revision: 262598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262598=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR target/84829
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 16:29:50 2018
New Revision: 262597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262597=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR target/84829
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jul 12 16:21:06 2018
New Revision: 262596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262596=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/86453 - error: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED in free_lang_data since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86436
--- Comment #2 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Folding instantiations of member functions of class templates is a low hanging
fruit IMHO. So if they are not handled ATM, then consider this ticket as a
feature request, rather than a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86506
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tower120 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-7-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86004
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 86496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86496
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86374
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #3)
> index f6fa2f7..fbdf838 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
> @@ -2555,6 +2555,7 @@ number_of_iterations_popcount (loop_p loop, edge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862
--- Comment #18 from Wilco ---
(In reply to niva from comment #17)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #16)
> > (In reply to niva from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #14)
> ...
> > If you implement the hook like I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84413
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 12:47:48 2018
New Revision: 262584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262584=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR target/84829
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 12:32:30 2018
New Revision: 262583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262583=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR debug/86462
* dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86507
--- Comment #1 from tower120 ---
Created attachment 44388
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44388=edit
compilation error message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86507
Bug ID: 86507
Summary: std::filesystem not work on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > gimple *phi = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (b_11);
> > if (gimple_code (phi) != GIMPLE_PHI
> > || (gimple_assign_lhs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, jg at jguk dot org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, jg at jguk dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
> Richard,
> Ok I will have a look at that soon...
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84829
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 11:53:34 2018
New Revision: 262582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262582=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR target/84829
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
Richard,
Ok I will have a look at that soon...
Could I ask, do you know if GCC already has dwarf sanity checks when outputting
.debug_str size to check offsets are not larger than the size?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #3)
> Hello Richard
> It's commercial source code that can't be disclosed.
> Is there another way to create a test case which has the same issue? a lot
> of debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86469
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
Hello Richard
It's commercial source code that can't be disclosed.
Is there another way to create a test case which has the same issue? a lot of
debug information?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862
--- Comment #17 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #16)
> (In reply to niva from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #14)
...
> If you implement the hook like I did on AArch64 then the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> gimple *phi = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (b_11);
> if (gimple_code (phi) != GIMPLE_PHI
> || (gimple_assign_lhs (and_stmt)
> !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86497
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Started with r254167, so maybe related to PR84251.
Yes, it is the same issue. As said in PR84251, we have to wrap COMPARE into
UNSPEC, so this defeats some passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86468
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86312
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86471
--- Comment #5 from Matt Bentley ---
What would be even more useful is a warning: for unused data.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86506
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86506
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
$ ~/gcc/results.262549.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -O3 bug450.c
bug450.c: In function ‘b’:
bug450.c:5:21: warning: assignment to ‘int’ from ‘void (*)()’ makes integer
from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86503
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
You run out of memory or stack. Try ulimit -s unlimited
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86506
Bug ID: 86506
Summary: tree-vect-patterns.c:225: shift too large for type ?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86489
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
gimple *phi = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (b_11);
if (gimple_code (phi) != GIMPLE_PHI
|| (gimple_assign_lhs (and_stmt)
!= gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop)->dest_idx)))
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86504
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86492
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122
--- Comment #14 from rpirrera at aitek dot it ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Can you please open a new bugreport? Btw, your snippet doesn't compile
> because you miss ANSI_BOLD and friends, removing it and adding a #include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505
Bug ID: 86505
Summary: __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of
arguments wrongly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86492
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 12 07:46:04 2018
New Revision: 262577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262577=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86492
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86492
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 12 07:39:33 2018
New Revision: 262576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262576=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/86492
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86504
--- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu ---
Created attachment 44387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44387=edit
bad vectorizatoin result for boundary size 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86504
Bug ID: 86504
Summary: vectorization failure for a nest loop
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86453
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 07:13:36 2018
New Revision: 262575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262575=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR c/86453
* c-attribs.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86479
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 12 07:11:50 2018
New Revision: 262574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262574=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-07-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/86479
* fold-const.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 86479, which changed state.
Bug 86479 Summary: [9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at
gimplify.c:5756
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86479
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86450
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> For libstdc++ the default (without --enable-werror or --disable-werror) is
> to add $(WERROR_FLAG) to WARN_FLAGS. WERROR_FLAG is empty by default, but
>
96 matches
Mail list logo
