https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87547
Bug ID: 87547
Summary: G++ reports bad type names for bit-field members
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181007 (experimental) [trunk revision 264906] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61807
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63374
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49171
comexk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||comexk at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87542
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Summary|]7/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 44803
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44803=edit
First piece of the work...
This adds the parsing, checking, resolution and calling of the library routines
(if any).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, what you say seems reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87545
Bug ID: 87545
Summary: [9 Regression] -mtune=intel regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544
--- Comment #2 from Gael Guennebaud ---
Indeed, if I redefine max_size as follows instead of relying on std::allocator
then the warning is gone:
size_type max_size() const {
return std::numeric_limits::max()/sizeof(T);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80977
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Conrads ---
With GCC bug 80977, half of all values from the random bit generator may be
ignored by std::uniform_int_distribution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80977
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Conrads ---
Created attachment 44802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44802=edit
Patch proposal for GCC bug 80977
This patch attempts to fix bug 80977. The code in __generate_impl was not
tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80977
Christoph Conrads changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@christoph-conrads.name
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544
Bug ID: 87544
Summary: alloc-size-larger-than incorrectly triggered
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
20 matches
Mail list logo
