[Bug rtl-optimization/88652] New: sel-sched.c:1545:11: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type 'long unsigned int [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88652 Bug ID: 88652 Summary: sel-sched.c:1545:11: runtime error: index 2 out of bounds for type 'long unsigned int [2]' Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/88651] New: tree-data-ref.c:3764:26: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775802 - -6 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88651 Bug ID: 88651 Summary: tree-data-ref.c:3764:26: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775802 - -6 cannot be represented in type 'long int' Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/88650] [9 Regression] ICE in set_even_probabilities at gcc/predict.c:885 since r267485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88650 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88650] New: [9 Regression] ICE in set_even_probabilities at gcc/predict.c:885 since r267485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88650 Bug ID: 88650 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in set_even_probabilities at gcc/predict.c:885 since r267485 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/88649] New: runtime error: load of value 137971008, which is not a valid value for type 'gfc_intrinsic_op'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88649 Bug ID: 88649 Summary: runtime error: load of value 137971008, which is not a valid value for type 'gfc_intrinsic_op' Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/79011] incorrect form of warning options listed in the manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79011 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0) > Section 3.8 of the manual, Options to Request or Suppress Warnings, states > that: > > "This manual lists only one of the two forms, whichever is not the >

[Bug c++/87729] Please include -Woverloaded-virtual in -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #0) > clang includes -Woverloaded-virtual in -Wall. Please do same for gcc. I was looking for a testcase to check and tried g++.dg/warn/pr61945.C but clang doesn't

[Bug target/65782] Assembly failure (invalid register for .seh_savexmm) with -O3 -mavx512f on mingw-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65782 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Fruzynski --- I got following link: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53733624/is-xmm8-register-value-preserved-across-calls/53733767#53733767 Quote from it: "Any additional registers for newer instruction sets are

[Bug c/88648] New: Force unified syntax for inline assembly not functional (-masm-syntax-unified)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88648 Bug ID: 88648 Summary: Force unified syntax for inline assembly not functional (-masm-syntax-unified) Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/65782] Assembly failure (invalid register for .seh_savexmm) with -O3 -mavx512f on mingw-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65782 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Fruzynski --- I have found that I can use -ffixed-reg option for this. It allows to eliminate one register, so I have to use it 16 times to eliminate all xmm16..31 registers. It would be handy to have another option

[Bug target/65782] Assembly failure (invalid register for .seh_savexmm) with -O3 -mavx512f on mingw-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65782 Daniel Fruzynski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 82743, which changed state. Bug 82743 Summary: uncaught character truncation in derived type initialization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/82743] uncaught character truncation in derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82743] uncaught character truncation in derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82743 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 1 21:19:53 2019 New Revision: 267499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267499=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-01 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/82743 * primary.c

[Bug c/88647] New: Rejects valid program dereferencing pointer with incomplete reference type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88647 Bug ID: 88647 Summary: Rejects valid program dereferencing pointer with incomplete reference type. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/88041] gdc.test tests should include that prefix in test names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88041 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannespfau at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/65342] [7/8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_(un)?pack_1.f90 -O1 execution test on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r210201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is this still present on ppc?

[Bug target/52491] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52491 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/88640] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88640 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- It looks like a generic problem to me, fwiw.

[Bug c/88635] [8 Regression] Assembler error when building with "-g -O2 -m32"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88635 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88640] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/88645] Don't assume functions are always nonnull if there's __attribute__((weak_import)), similar to __attribute__((weak))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88645 MCCCS changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88575] gcc got confused by different comparison operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88575 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski --- I have tried to compile with -O3 -march=skylake -ffast-math and got this: [asm] test(double, double): vminsd xmm2, xmm0, xmm1 vcmplesdxmm0, xmm0, xmm1 vxorpd xmm1, xmm1,

[Bug middle-end/88575] gcc got confused by different comparison operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88575 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Code was compiled with -O3 -march=skylake. I have tried to add -fno-signed-zeros and -fsigned-zeros, and got the same output for both cases.

[Bug c++/88646] Optimizer failure on integer sum overflow cast to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---