[Bug c++/88831] New: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly changed when -g option is enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88831 Bug ID: 88831 Summary: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly changed when -g option is enabled. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/88832] New: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly changed when -g option is enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88832 Bug ID: 88832 Summary: the layout of .data section of a binary is slightly changed when -g option is enabled. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/88738] treat shared_ptr and unique_ptr more like plain old pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > Yes, I would guess that clang's "dumb" warning is fine for 99% of cases, and > the handful of exceptions could use #pragma to disable the warning. Or an

[Bug tree-optimization/88828] Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug testsuite/85368] [8 regression] phi-opt-11 test fails on IBM Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85368 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/87329] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87329 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug pch/56549] #pragma once ineffective with BOM in include file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549 leonard gerard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leolchat at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/88776] Namelist read from stdin: loss of data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/88776] Namelist read from stdin: loss of data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jan 14 02:03:34 2019 New Revision: 267912 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267912=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk PR

[Bug libfortran/88776] Namelist read from stdin: loss of data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jan 14 01:12:27 2019 New Revision: 267911 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267911=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/88776 *

[Bug libstdc++/88738] treat shared_ptr and unique_ptr more like plain old pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88738 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I would guess that clang's "dumb" warning is fine for 99% of cases, and the handful of exceptions could use #pragma to disable the warning. But until/unless G++ gets such a warning, decorating the

[Bug libstdc++/86655] std::assoc_legendre should not constrain the value of m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86655 --- Comment #5 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 45423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45423=edit Final patch that passes. 2018-01-14 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> PR libstdc++/86655

[Bug libfortran/88776] Namelist read from stdin: loss of data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88776 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jan 14 00:22:00 2019 New Revision: 267910 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267910=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/88776 * io/open.c

[Bug c++/88825] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in can_do_nrvo_p, at cp/typeck.c:9361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5 Summary|ICE on (invalid)

[Bug c++/88819] ICE (segfault) when compiling C++ code with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88830] [9 Regression] ice in maybe_emit_vtables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88830] [9 Regression] ice in maybe_emit_vtables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r267855.

[Bug c++/88830] [9 Regression] ice in maybe_emit_vtables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/88820] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- This reduced test ICEs left and right with -std=c++17/14 since r236221, but the ICE changed into another ICE with r248433. template <__SIZE_TYPE__> class basic_fixed_string; struct empty_subject; template

[Bug c++/88825] ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in can_do_nrvo_p, at cp/typeck.c:9361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/88830] New: ice in maybe_emit_vtables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88830 Bug ID: 88830 Summary: ice in maybe_emit_vtables Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c/80354] Poor support to silence -Wformat-truncation=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80354 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #10) > Many other warnings are supressed with (void), why is this one so special? Not too many warnings can be suppressed by casts. Those that can must be at

[Bug c++/88829] New: Failure to deduce size of array of 2^31 chars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88829 Bug ID: 88829 Summary: Failure to deduce size of array of 2^31 chars Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/88803] gfortran documentation warning: '.' or ',' must follow @xref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88820] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 --- Comment #4 from Hana Dusíková --- The ICE will not happen if you comment out line 464 from first example.

[Bug fortran/88803] gfortran documentation warning: '.' or ',' must follow @xref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803 --- Comment #3 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Jan 13 19:18:46 2019 New Revision: 267906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267906=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/88803

[Bug target/88828] New: Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828 Bug ID: 88828 Summary: Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/88729] ICE in libiberty during bootstrap with debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88729 Nicolas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 58618, which changed state. Bug 58618 Summary: Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/58618] Wrong code with character substring and ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/88827] New: Rejects valid program using &* operator combination.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88827 Bug ID: 88827 Summary: Rejects valid program using &* operator combination. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/56386] [F03] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 56386, which changed state. Bug 56386 Summary: [F03] ICE with ASSOCIATE construct and an derived type array component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386 What|Removed

[Bug c++/88800] Spurious -Werror=array-bounds for non-taken branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88800 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88820] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c/88647] Rejects valid program dereferencing pointer with incomplete reference type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88647 Anders Granlund changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88092] class nontype template deduction failed when providing type to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092 --- Comment #8 from Hana Dusíková --- Please ignore two last comments, I sent them to wrong bug, it was supposed to be for #88820.

[Bug c++/88820] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 --- Comment #2 from Hana Dusíková --- Created attachment 45422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45422=edit referencing subtype unable to deduce parent type ~/projekty/ice-gcc > g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DREFERENCE

[Bug c++/88824] erroneous report

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88824 Zhendong Su changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88826] New: ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88826 Bug ID: 88826 Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling invalid C++ code with -std=c++2a Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/82215] Feature request to better support two pass compiling with gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82215 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88092] class nontype template deduction failed when providing type to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092 --- Comment #7 from Hana Dusíková --- If you compile it with: g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DREFERENCE => correct g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DAUTO => correct g++-HEAD minimal.cpp -std=c++2a -DCNTTP minimal.cpp: In member

[Bug c++/88820] ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 --- Comment #1 from Hana Dusíková --- I think I found a related problem. It's about deducting argument of a class when instantiating subtype. I created a minimal case. I'm attaching.

[Bug c++/88092] class nontype template deduction failed when providing type to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092 --- Comment #6 from Hana Dusíková --- Created attachment 45421 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45421=edit argument deduction of parent type

[Bug c++/88825] New: ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in can_do_nrvo_p, at cp/typeck.c:9361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88825 Bug ID: 88825 Summary: ICE on (invalid) C++11 code: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in can_do_nrvo_p, at cp/typeck.c:9361 Product: gcc

[Bug c++/88824] New: ICE on invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88824 Bug ID: 88824 Summary: ICE on invalid Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug fortran/56789] Handling of contiguous dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21) > Hi Paul, > > > I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion > > that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense. > > Well, in

[Bug fortran/52351] Wrong bounds when passing an array section to an intent-in pointer dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87689] Memory corruption on Power 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40976 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug tree-optimization/88823] New: ivopts introduces -1(OVF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88823 Bug ID: 88823 Summary: ivopts introduces -1(OVF) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c/88822] New: Strange inconsistency between types of qualified rvalues.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 Bug ID: 88822 Summary: Strange inconsistency between types of qualified rvalues. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57992] Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/36854] [meta-bug] fortran front-end optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854 Bug 36854 depends on bug 57992, which changed state. Bug 57992 Summary: Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 What

[Bug c++/88664] [9 Regression] False positive -Waddress-of-packed-member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #6) > There's STRIP_NOPS, isn't there? The updated patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00732.html

[Bug fortran/59345] _gfortran_internal_pack on compiler generated temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019 New Revision: 267905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/57992 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/57992] Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jan 13 14:57:39 2019 New Revision: 267905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267905=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/57992 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/57992] Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Chris Elrod from comment #3) > Created attachment 45014 [details] > Code that produces lots of unnecessary and performance-crippling > _gfortran_internal_pack@PLT and

[Bug fortran/88821] New: Inline packing of non-contiguous arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88821 Bug ID: 88821 Summary: Inline packing of non-contiguous arguments Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/56789] Handling of contiguous dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/56789] Handling of contiguous dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Thomas, I was mulling this over a few months ago and came to the conclusion that copy-in/copy-out was the only thing that made sense. The IBM manual is explicit about this:

[Bug c++/88664] [9 Regression] False positive -Waddress-of-packed-member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88664 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- There's STRIP_NOPS, isn't there?

[Bug fortran/57992] Pointless packing of contiguous arrays for simply contiguous functions results as actual arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57992 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/88803] gfortran documentation warning: '.' or ',' must follow @xref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88803 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > More annoying than the warnings id the text displayed in the manual: > > the See CONVERT specifier on the open statement or the See >

[Bug fortran/67277] segfault when passing a missing optional argument to an elemental intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|tkoenig at gcc

[Bug c++/86356] "invalid use of pack expansion" with fold expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86356 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug fortran/67277] segfault when passing a missing optional argument to an elemental intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88820] New: ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820 Bug ID: 88820 Summary: ICE in in C++2a mode for code which is able to be compiled in C++17 mode Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56789] Handling of contiguous dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig --- I have asked in https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/comp.lang.fortran$20contiguous$20dummy%7Csort:date/comp.lang.fortran/QiFkx8b48uw/wtQE9M_aFwAJ . Let's see what sort of answers there will be, apart

[Bug fortran/35267] VOLATILE constrain: Misleading error message "Incompatible ranks"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35267 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59345] _gfortran_internal_pack on compiler generated temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59345] _gfortran_internal_pack on compiler generated temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jan 13 11:06:03 2019 New Revision: 267903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267903=gcc=rev Log: 2019-01-13 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/59345 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/31592] Better message if using non-intrinsic initialization expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31592 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- In the F2018 draft I see 10.1.11 Specification expression ... 5 A function is a specification function if it is a pure function, is not a standard intrinsic function, is not an internal function,

[Bug fortran/38619] error message when converting between different derived types with same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38619 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/34706] FE should reuse array temporaries, reduce temporaties and tell ME the array-size type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34706 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/88819] New: ICE (segfault) when compiling C++ code with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88819 Bug ID: 88819 Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling C++ code with -std=c++2a Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/44589] Missing not-set diagnositic (as READ arguments are clobbered)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44589 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (b) is pr30802.

[Bug fortran/80257] Cygwin test fail: pointer_check_1.f90 output test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80257 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is this PR still valid (over a year without feedback)?