https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #4 from fdlbxtqi ---
It sounds like it is a huge bug. I am using windows insider + wsl2. The problem
can even be observed on native windows.
I hope it could be fixed as soon as possible, or I could not build new
version's GCC on any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60523
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> *** Bug 70952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
While this was a mistake, it still might be worth grouping the flag proposed in
that bug,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92262
Bug ID: 92262
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error:
incorrect sharing of tree nodes)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92226
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Oct 28 23:46:09 2019
New Revision: 277545
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277545=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/92226 - live nul char store to array eliminated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 92226, which changed state.
Bug 92226 Summary: [10 Regression] live nul char store to array eliminated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92226
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92226
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92261
Bug ID: 92261
Summary: syntax errors on __has_builtin (__has_builtin)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Bug 90835 depends on bug 66970, which changed state.
Bug 66970 Summary: Add __has_builtin() macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
--- Comment #23 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Oct 28 22:46:28 2019
New Revision: 277544
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277544=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/66970 - Add __has_builtin() macro
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/66970
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91843
--- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Patch was sent for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00766.html
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like we need to teach constexpr how to evaluate a call to __dynamic_cast.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92258
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92208
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92226
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
The reduced C++ code seems to be:
extern "C" int abs(int);
enum { a };
typedef int (*b)(const unsigned char *, long, const unsigned char *, long);
struct f {
struct {
b c;
} cu[];
};
template
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
The bug seems to start sometime between revision 277200 and 277250.
A run of creduce is proceeding in the other window. I'll report
back when it is finished.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92260
Bug ID: 92260
Summary: ice in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2162
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65342
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Oct 28 20:02:01 2019
New Revision: 277543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277543=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, PPC] Fix PR 65342.
The current Darwin load/store lo_sum patterns have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67183
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Oct 28 19:56:27 2019
New Revision: 277542
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277542=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, machopic] Fix for 67183
When we're using the LLVM-based assembler (the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Oct 28 19:40:03 2019
New Revision: 277540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277540=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with relocations.
Darwin's linker doesn't like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82981
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Oct 28 19:17:58 2019
New Revision: 277537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277537=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/82981
* config/mips/mips.md (mulditi3): Generate patterns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77918
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The glibc patch does not need to wait for GCC 10 to be released (we're not
concerned with old development versions of GCC in glibc, __GNUC_PREREQ
(10, 0) can be used for anything fixed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
My previous comment was that the *patch* for that old bug was a
host-dependency, so the bug having been closed as fixed suggests that the
issue may be present in the source tree, not that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also this seems like it should be filed/fixed upstream first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92247
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
SANITIZER_USES_CANONICAL_LINUX_SYSCALLS is not defined yet but I think Linux
upstream removed the define for __NR_open as it is a legacy system call only
there for backwards compability for old binaries.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 28 18:28:48 2019
New Revision: 277531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277531=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Paul Thomas
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/91926
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92229
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, arieltorti14 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92229
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ariel Torti ---
> (In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92259
--- Comment #1 from Jan ---
Created attachment 47121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47121=edit
gcov file
ibs/harfbuzz.gcov -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-exceptions -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -o h
b-ot-layout.s
GNU C++14 (Gentoo 10.0.0_pre) version 10.0.0-pre9999 20191028
(experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 10.0.0-pre9999 20191028 (experimental), GMP
vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ilya Albrekht from comment #2)
> PS. I guess you meant 512 bit?
Yes I mean 512bit or 64 byte.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Albrekht ---
Thank you for your prompt reply. I missed that __m512i_u type exists to avoid
alignment requirement.
PS. I guess you meant 512 bit?
Regards,
Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92258
Bug ID: 92258
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid %-code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88337
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
So can be closed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
Done.
int ze, r2;
int i0[2];
void
np (int ch)
{
while (ch < 1)
{
if (i0[ch] != 0)
ze = r2 = ch;
++ch;
}
}
% gcc-10.0.0-alpha20191027 -O3 -c bisb9gfl.c
during GIMPLE pass:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92257
Bug ID: 92257
Summary: AVX512 incorrect usage of aligned loads and stores
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92256
Bug ID: 92256
Summary: [10 regression] error in gcc.dg/unroll-and-jam.c after
r277501
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163
--- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Mon Oct 28 15:01:24 2019
New Revision: 277525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277525=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92255
Bug ID: 92255
Summary: No "did you mean" hint for specialization of
unrecognised variable template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882
--- Comment #8 from Elad Lahav ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The problem with the naked attribute is usually it is not well defined. For
> things like interrupts functions and interrupt returns, there is always
> plain .s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91272
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Mon Oct 28 14:50:58 2019
New Revision: 277524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277524=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #5)
> It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch
> tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours?
Yes, fine with me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem with the naked attribute is usually it is not well defined. For
things like interrupts functions and interrupt returns, there is always plain
.s files. Interrupts usually save/restore all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23577
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882
--- Comment #6 from Elad Lahav ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> Patches need to be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org. Note, if you've not
> contributed to gcc before you'll also need to sort out a copyright
> assignment for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #12 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Author: guojiufu
Date: Mon Oct 28 14:30:05 2019
New Revision: 277523
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277523=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
PR target/70010
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Tobias,
It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch
tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours?
Cheers
Paul
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:34,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #11 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Author: guojiufu
Date: Mon Oct 28 14:23:26 2019
New Revision: 277521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277521=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
PR target/70010
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Oct 28 14:16:50 2019
New Revision: 277520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277520=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/92225
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92254
Bug ID: 92254
Summary: [10 regression] ICE LTO in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:2000
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Author: guojiufu
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:55:41 2019
New Revision: 277518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277518=gcc=rev
Log:
[rs6000] PR70010, avoid no-vsx function to be inlined to vsx function
In PR70010,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92242
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r277504 PASS for me.
Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Elad Lahav from comment #4)
> Created attachment 47119 [details]
> Proposed implementation of naked functions for aarch64
>
> The change is quite simple (see the proposed patch). I hope it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:43:49 2019
New Revision: 277517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277517=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92252
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed, but leaving open for a possibly new testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:42:03 2019
New Revision: 277516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277516=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/92241
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007
--- Comment #18 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iii
Date: Mon Oct 28 13:09:54 2019
New Revision: 277515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277515=gcc=rev
Log:
Move jump threading before reload
r266734 has introduced a new instance of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92253
Bug ID: 92253
Summary: [10 Regression] 25% regression in 465.tonto with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 28 12:25:09 2019
New Revision: 277512
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277512=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-10-28 Richard Biener
PR c/92249
* gimple-parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Maybe we need more delayed parsing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88165
Toni Neubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lutztonineubert at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Oct 28 11:29:43 2019
New Revision: 277510
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277510=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/92225
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882
Elad Lahav changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e2lahav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> Will you do the fix?
I have it in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92225
>
> --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, asolokha at gmx dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249
>
> --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
> OK, I'll finally blacklist all GIMPLE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92007
--- Comment #17 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iii
Date: Mon Oct 28 10:04:31 2019
New Revision: 277507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277507=gcc=rev
Log:
Move jump threading before reload
r266734 has introduced a new instance of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92252
Bug ID: 92252
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
vect_stmt_to_vectorize)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92224
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's undefined, so the implementation is not required to give an error. To
quote the standard:
Undefined behavior may be expected when this document omits any explicit
definition of behavior or when a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #9 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Author: guojiufu
Date: Mon Oct 28 09:46:15 2019
New Revision: 277506
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277506=gcc=rev
Log:
[rs6000] PR70010, avoid no-vsx function to be inlined to vsx function
In PR70010,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The attached test case is gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind-c-intent-out.f90 which
is part of the committed to fix PR 91863.
Due to this PR, the committed test case uses 'dg-do compile' instead of 'dg-do
run'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 28 09:36:27 2019
New Revision: 277505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277505=gcc=rev
Log:
Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
Bug ID: 92251
Summary: [10 regression] SEGV in ipa_get_cs_argument_count
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92249
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
OK, I'll finally blacklist all GIMPLE testcases altogether as I already do w/
RTL ones.
It didn't seem right to me that some GIMPLE testcases yield ICE when compiled
w/ -fno-gimple, but if that's by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85947
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92250
Bug ID: 92250
Summary: valgrind: ira_traverse_loop_tree – Conditional jump or
move depends on uninitialised value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
