[Bug rtl-optimization/92510] [10 Regression] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug middle-end/26241] [8/9 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |10.0 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

--- > > Results: > > -- > $ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra test.c && ./a.out > > $ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -O3 test.c &&

[Bug tree-optimization/92516] ice in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:4095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Agreed. Since code is fine with -O2, but not with -O3, then it looks like an optimiser problem to me. About 2 hours of reduction has already been done. More is in progress. Current size is about 2.2

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 > > Martin Sebor changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 > > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- > I have another idea, cant we add fake

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- Update: the last bug that was open that this bug depends upon has been closed. So, ok to close this one as well?

[Bug middle-end/26241] [8/9 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 Bug 951 depends on bug 26241, which changed state. Bug 26241 Summary: [8/9 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/90466] Documentation: -Wconversion-extra not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90466 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81159] New warning idea: -Wself-move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81159 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Ok, this shouldn't be too hard. I guess I could implement it for GCC 10. last chance to get it in before stage 1 closes...

[Bug target/92132] new test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-reduc-4.c fails with its introduction in r277067

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92132 Li Jia He changed: What|Removed |Added CC||helijia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/92098] [10 Regression] After r262333, the following code cannot be vectorized on powerpc64le.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92098 Li Jia He changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92524] New: ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 Bug ID: 92524 Summary: ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/92523] New: Unhelpful error messages when requires-clause contains function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92523 Bug ID: 92523 Summary: Unhelpful error messages when requires-clause contains function call Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/88075] [feature-request] allow "concept" instead of "concept bool" with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92403, which changed state. Bug 92403 Summary: [concepts] requires expression in if constexpr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92403, which changed state. Bug 92403 Summary: [concepts] requires expression in if constexpr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/92186] [concepts] requires expression outside of concept definition cannot return false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92186 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/92403] [concepts] requires expression in if constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92403 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug c++/92439] [concepts] trunk crashes on constraint satisfaction failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92439 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/80105] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80105 Bug 80105 depends on bug 69728, which changed state. Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 What

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 69728, which changed state. Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 What

[Bug other/80069] ICE at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1176

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80069 Bug 80069 depends on bug 69728, which changed state. Bug 69728 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 What

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83325] Compile time hog w/ -Os -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83325 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- Is it still an issue? I cannot reproduce it anywhere anymore. Maybe related PR82952 could be more appropriate for tracking it further.

[Bug middle-end/26241] [8/9 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241 --- Comment #24 from Xiong Hu XS Luo --- closing this since no need backport?

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/92522] New: valid code using deque throws bad_alloc when compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92522 Bug ID: 92522 Summary: valid code using deque throws bad_alloc when compiled with -flto Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/92507] False positives with -Wsign-compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92507 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/91182] deprecated attribute string-literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91182 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/92521] New: [[deprecated(("string-literal"))]] accepted with extra parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92521 Bug ID: 92521 Summary: [[deprecated(("string-literal"))]] accepted with extra parentheses Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug testsuite/92520] New: new test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/inline-9.c in r278220 is unresolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92520 Bug ID: 92520 Summary: new test case gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/inline-9.c in r278220 is unresolved Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/92519] New: Spurious "note: ... has no user-provided default constructor"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92519 Bug ID: 92519 Summary: Spurious "note: ... has no user-provided default constructor" Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

- Results: -- $ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra test.c && ./a.out $ gcc -std=c11 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -O3 test.c && ./a.out 1222 ------ gcc x86-64 versio

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Sylvain Korzennik from comment #11) > I'll try rebuilding it w/ ./configure > --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Or let GCC build them for you, by putting their sources in the GCC source tree, as

[Bug lto/48200] Implement function attribute for symbol versioning (.symver)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200 --- Comment #39 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #38) > Internally in GCC the symver is handled just as normal alias only output > differntly. I think GCC, just like static linker, does not really need > to understand

[Bug target/92518] [10 regression] ppc rounding tests fail after r278207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/92518] New: [10 regression] ppc rounding tests fail on power 7 (only) after r278207

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518 Bug ID: 92518 Summary: [10 regression] ppc rounding tests fail on power 7 (only) after r278207 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/48200] Implement function attribute for symbol versioning (.symver)

.LFB0: .cfi_startproc ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .size t, .-t .symver t, bar@2.2 .ident "GCC: (GNU) 10.0.0 20191114 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits Internally it defines a new kind of alias (symver

[Bug lto/48200] Implement function attribute for symbol versioning (.symver)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlos at redhat dot com --- Comment #37

[Bug c/66825] RFE: Add attributes for symbol versioning.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66825 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/92463] Cleanups due to minimum MPFR version bump to 3.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92463 --- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist --- Seems r269139 can be reverted, that's apparently a patch to fix some accidental breakage due to depending on a too new MPFR version.

[Bug tree-optimization/92516] ice in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:4095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/92516] ice in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:4095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Problem first seems to occur sometime between revision 278200 and 278250. Code reduction now in progress, but since the size of the partially reduced code is currently 5.4 Megs, this is expected to take

[Bug debug/80646] [8/9/10 Regression] wrong type info for extern inline function when compiling Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 Paul Eggert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92517] New: ICE on incorrect syntax involving requires and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92517 Bug ID: 92517 Summary: ICE on incorrect syntax involving requires and decltype Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/92516] New: ice in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:4095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92516 Bug ID: 92516 Summary: ice in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:4095 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/92263] [10 Regression] ICE in commit_one_edge_insertion, at cfgrtl.c:2087 since r270758

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92263 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92515] New: [10 regression] ICE in many test cases after r278235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92515 Bug ID: 92515 Summary: [10 regression] ICE in many test cases after r278235 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Current patch (modulo testsuite changes) that seems to work pretty well: diff --git gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c index 76d1e4a380e..9766d7f96c4 100644 ---

[Bug other/92366] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-41.c fails with its introduction in r277784

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Thu Nov 14 19:24:21 2019 New Revision: 278262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278262=gcc=rev Log: Tweak gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-4[01].c (PR92366)

[Bug c++/91366] Implement P1816R0: Class template argument deduction for aggregates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91366 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #11 from Sylvain Korzennik --- Thx - for GMP, /config.guess returns skylake-pc-linux-gnu not x86_64-pc-linux-gnu hence the mess... I'll try rebuilding it w/ ./configure --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Cheers, Sylvain -- On

[Bug tree-optimization/92506] [10 Regression] Wrong code with -fwrapv since r277979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92506 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod --- Author: amacleod Date: Thu Nov 14 19:02:48 2019 New Revision: 278259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278259=gcc=rev Log: 2019-11-14 Andrew MacLeod PR tree-optimization/92506 *

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sylvain Korzennik from comment #9) > 1- that page does not tell me how to build a generic version >./config.guess returns the same value on ea machine, as does gcc > -dumpmachine >

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #9 from Sylvain Korzennik --- 1- that page does not tell me how to build a generic version ./config.guess returns the same value on ea machine, as does gcc -dumpmachine x86_64-pc-linux-gnu do I add --build=XX --host-XX or

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Please read: > https://gmplib.org/manual/Build-Options.html NOTE also if you compile GMP/MPF/MPC as part of the GCC build, it will do the correct thing and

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #6 from Sylvain Korzennik --- Thanks for your prompt replies! 1- we use a NSF mounted disk to serve ~90 servers (~4100 cores), w/ a set of diff CPUs. It does compile fine on the server the code was built on. 2- what flags do I use

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #5 from Sylvain Korzennik --- Thanks for your prompt replies! 1- we use a NSF mounted disk to serve ~90 servers (~4100 cores), w/ a set of diff CPUs. It does compile fine on the server the code was built on. 2- what flags do I use

[Bug target/92462] [arm32] -ftree-pre makes a variable to be wrongly hoisted out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462 --- Comment #17 from Aleksei Voitylov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14) > Have you tested gcc 7.5.0 that was just released? How about gcc 8.x? Have > you tried that. There has been aliasing bugs in gcc before and this might >

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Is your MPFR/GMP/MPC compiled on a different computer and then copied over? If so you need an extra configure flag to them; otherwise they will be compiled for that computer (CPU) and will not always work

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #3 from Sylvain Korzennik --- => gcc-9.2.0/do-configure.sou <== module load gcc/8.2.0 ./configure --prefix=/share/apps/tools/gcc/9.2.0 \ --enable-shared \ --disable-multilib \

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 --- Comment #2 from Sylvain Korzennik --- ==> gcc-9.2.0/do-configure.sou <== module load gcc/8.2.0 ./configure --prefix=/share/apps/tools/gcc/9.2.0 \ --enable-shared \ --disable-multilib \

[Bug c++/92514] limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/88226] missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an unterminated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/92501] strncmp with constant unterminated arrays not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92501 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92514] New: limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92514 Bug ID: 92514 Summary: limits:1668:7: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/92506] [10 Regression] Wrong code with -fwrapv since r277979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92506 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 47265 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47265=edit patch to resolve the issue Traced it back to a typo in operator_abs::fold_range() when I did the conversion where

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/92430] [9 Regression] Compile-time hog w/ -Os -fno-if-conversion -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92430 --- Comment #7 from iii at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: iii Date: Thu Nov 14 16:40:33 2019 New Revision: 278254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278254=gcc=rev Log: Make flag_thread_jumps a gate of pass_jump_after_combine This is a follow-up

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- I have another idea, cant we add fake field decls while doing structure layout? Then sra total scalarization will just work. And there is no other magic in the compiler needed?

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 14, 2019 5:11:55 PM GMT+01:00, "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 > >--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- >While I don't share

[Bug tree-optimization/92486] Wrong optimization: padding in structs is not copied even with memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- While I don't share this preference about assignments, SRA only ignores padding when doing "total scalarization" aka the poor man's aggregate copy propagation because in that mode it would have to invent

[Bug libgomp/92511] [OpenACC] Support subset subarray mappings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92511 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92509] auto deduction on different types does not emit diagnostic message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92509 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@nicholas-schwab.de --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/92512] New: [10 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92512 Bug ID: 92512 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2436 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/92513] New: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in maybe_replace_use, at tree-into-ssa.c:1817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92513 Bug ID: 92513 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in maybe_replace_use, at tree-into-ssa.c:1817 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libgomp/92511] New: [OpenACC] Support subset subarray mappings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92511 Bug ID: 92511 Summary: [OpenACC] Support subset subarray mappings Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, patch Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/83361] [7 Regression ?] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: non-cold basic block 3 reachable only by paths crossing the cold partition) on 32-bit BE powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83361 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/92366] new test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-41.c fails with its introduction in r277784

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92366 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/92163] [10 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in bitmap_set_bit)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92163 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80938] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/92510] New: [10 Regression] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92510 Bug ID: 92510 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in native_encode_rtx, at simplify-rtx.c:6272 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/92462] [arm32] -ftree-pre makes a variable to be wrongly hoisted out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92462 --- Comment #16 from Wilco --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > I can't find PRE doing anything wrong and on 32bit x86_64 the testcase > executes > correctly with GCC 7.3 and GCC 9 (when I add the missing return to >

[Bug c++/92509] New: auto deduction on different types does not emit diagnostic message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92509 Bug ID: 92509 Summary: auto deduction on different types does not emit diagnostic message Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > > The quux case: CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING is cleared here > > > >

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 --- Comment #8 from Hossein Talebi --- Hi Paul, Thanks for following up on this. I actually changed my programming language for this bug, just kidding :-). Cheers Hossein On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 16:05 pault at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug rtl-optimization/80491] [7 Regression] Compiler regression for long-add case.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/80520] [8/9/10 Regression] Performance regression from missing if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80520 Bug 80520 depends on bug 80491, which changed state. Bug 80491 Summary: [7 Regression] Compiler regression for long-add case. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/79173] add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173 Bug 79173 depends on bug 80491, which changed state. Bug 80491 Summary: [7 Regression] Compiler regression for long-add case. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80491 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > The quux case: CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING is cleared here > > > > 2154 /* The result of a constexpr function must

[Bug tree-optimization/69728] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in outer_projection_mupa, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728 --- Comment #26 from Arseny Solokha --- This this PR be closed now?

[Bug c++/91353] Implement P1331R2: Permitting trivial default initialization in constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91353 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > The quux case: CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING is cleared here > > 2154 /* The result of a constexpr function must be completely initialized. > */ > 2155 if

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Dear Hossein, This news is probably 1,379 days too late for you - I am just about to post a fix for this bug. I do apologise for the long delay but, for some reason, I saw the problem right away today having

[Bug tree-optimization/71144] [8/9/10 Regression] isl_aff.c:1001: position out of bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71144 --- Comment #12 from Arseny Solokha --- I believe this PR can be closed, per comment 9 (and likely comment 7).

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >