https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92954
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
Summary|missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92209
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92210
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91839
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91820
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93036
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93036
Bug ID: 93036
Summary: [9/10 Regression] g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class27.C
testcase accepted in -std=c++17 mode since r276248
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:51:15 2019
New Revision: 279687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279687=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91512
PR fortran/92738
* lang.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:51:15 2019
New Revision: 279687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279687=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/91512
PR fortran/92738
* lang.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93035
Bug ID: 93035
Summary: Found 91 mangled names which do not demangle using
c++filt
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92966
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028
--- Comment #2 from Colin H Close ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> It's not (easily) possible to reproduce the problem with what you've
> provided; the shell script has stuff like
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] |[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:30:04 2019
New Revision: 279686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279686=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92745 - bogus error when initializing array of vectors.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92974
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92974
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:25:44 2019
New Revision: 279685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279685=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92974 - bogus location for enum and non-enum in ?: warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92965
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:21:21 2019
New Revision: 279684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279684=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92965
* pt.c (invalid_nontype_parm_type_p): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92966
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:19:23 2019
New Revision: 279683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279683=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92966
* method.c (early_check_defaulted_comparison): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92973
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:18:09 2019
New Revision: 279682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279682=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92973
* method.c (early_check_defaulted_comparison): For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92666
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:16:58 2019
New Revision: 279681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279681=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92666
* call.c (convert_arg_to_ellipsis): For floating point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92992
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 23:15:52 2019
New Revision: 279680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279680=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/92992
* call.c (convert_arg_to_ellipsis): For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78622
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #5)
> > Author: jvdelisle
> > Date: Fri Dec 16 20:27:51 2016
> > New Revision: 243765
> >
> Wrong PR number, my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12)
> Author: tkoenig
> Date: Sun Feb 10 15:52:38 2019
> New Revision: 268748
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268748=gcc=rev
> Log:
> 2019-02-10 Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://www.freefilehosting. |http://www.freefilehosting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed by r218018
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64004
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Author: rguenth
> Date: Mon Nov 24 14:02:36 2014
> New Revision: 218018
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218018=gcc=rev
> Log:
> 2014-11-24 Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91661
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29027
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Janis Johnson from comment #3)
> Subject: Bug 29027
>
> Author: janis
> Date: Wed Apr 1 17:31:26 2009
> New Revision: 145422
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc=rev=145422
> Log:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36460
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andy Hutchinson from comment #2)
> Subject: Bug 36460
>
> Author: hutchinsonandy
> Date: Wed Jun 18 21:48:50 2008
> New Revision: 136919
>
> URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92947
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The problem here is the cp_unevaluated_operand check:
10147 if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn)
10148 && !(flags & LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING)
10149 && !cp_unevaluated_operand
10150
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Comment 4 belongs to PR 8995.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92990
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch cleaned up and with adjusted error message at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-12/msg00182.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
template struct S {
S(T *);
~S();
};
struct X {
struct C {
S d;
float e;
};
X();
};
S f(S);
X::X() { C a[]{f("")}; }
$ ./cc1plus -quiet 93033.C
93033.C: In constructor ‘X::X()’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47537=edit
gcc10-pr93009.patch
Untested fix.
The bug is obvious, these *_bcst_1 patterns used =v,v 0,v v,0 m,m constraints
but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832
--- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi, (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Fixed on trunk.
I am trying to back port the fix for 89832 into our company's gcc8.2.1 release.
by looking at the patch, it's huge, and it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034
Bug ID: 93034
Summary: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ code seems to be
template class b {
public:
b(a *);
~b();
};
class c {
struct C {
b d;
float e;
};
c();
};
b f(b);
c::c() { C a[]{f("")}; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033
Bug ID: 93033
Summary: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] Incorrect |[8 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] |[8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] GCC|[8 Regression] GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 9.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 92524, which changed state.
Bug 92524 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and
std::array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
g.peterh...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92977
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:45:56 2019
New Revision: 279676
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279676=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-19 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:50 2019
New Revision: 279675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279675=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:16 2019
New Revision: 279674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279674=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:43:23 2019
New Revision: 279673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279673=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:42:22 2019
New Revision: 279672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279672=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:41:17 2019
New Revision: 279671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279671=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92831
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:37:45 2019
New Revision: 279669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279669=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:48 2019
New Revision: 279668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279668=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-06 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource
> leaks:
>
> trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:08 2019
New Revision: 279667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279667=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:35:18 2019
New Revision: 279666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279666=gcc=rev
Log:
PR fortran/92756
* omp-low.c (check_omp_nesting_restrictions): If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032
Bug ID: 93032
Summary: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in
zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c
Product: gcc
Version: analyzer branch
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92732
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:34:14 2019
New Revision: 279665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279665=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:33:13 2019
New Revision: 279664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279664=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:32:23 2019
New Revision: 279663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279663=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:30:38 2019
New Revision: 279662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279662=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:26:28 2019
New Revision: 279661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279661=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-28 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:25:39 2019
New Revision: 279660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279660=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:24:30 2019
New Revision: 279659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279659=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92664
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:23:34 2019
New Revision: 279658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279658=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:22 2019
New Revision: 279657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279657=gcc=rev
Log:
fortran: Fix PR number in comment of testcase for PR 69497
The testcase was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:18 2019
New Revision: 279656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279656=gcc=rev
Log:
libstdc++: Add inline to maybe-constexpr functions (PR 92927)
Originally these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92648
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:01:08 2019
New Revision: 279655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279655=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 17:00:02 2019
New Revision: 279654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279654=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:07 2019
New Revision: 279652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279652=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:35 2019
New Revision: 279653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279653=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:57:21 2019
New Revision: 279651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279651=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-23 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:56:30 2019
New Revision: 279650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279650=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 20 16:55:06 2019
New Revision: 279649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279649=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2019-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
Matthias Hochsteger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Hochsteger ---
Created attachment 47534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47534=edit
new code, cout results
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031
Bug ID: 93031
Summary: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer
alignment, option to make GCC not assume it
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90040
--- Comment #2 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Same ICE also appears when compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71550.c with -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions
-fmodulo-sched -freorder-blocks-and-partition on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018
--- Comment #3 from John Drouhard ---
I don't think this is a matter of object lifetime. Passing -fnolifetime-dse or
-flifetime-dse=1 does not change the generated assembly here at all.
As a user of the functions baz1 and baz2, I would expect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030
Bug ID: 93030
Summary: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c
FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
