[Bug rtl-optimization/94256] Setting max-sched-region-blocks to >48 causes GCC memory usage to explode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94256 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- Sandra, I am pretty sure it should exist, can you check which git revision you are looking at?

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 --- Comment #3 from Nicholas Krause --- I've managed to track this down to what appears to me to be a issue in: tree push_inner_scope (tree inner) { tree outer = current_scope (); if (!outer) outer = current_namespace;

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 Nicholas Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com,

[Bug ipa/94256] New: Setting max-sched-region-blocks to >48 causes GCC memory usage to explode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94256 Bug ID: 94256 Summary: Setting max-sched-region-blocks to >48 causes GCC memory usage to explode Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug d/91595] Version (Windows) is not defined in GCC D Compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- Created attachment 48078 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48078=edit winnt-d support Attached patch, though the target is untested.

[Bug c++/94255] template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 --- Comment #1 from Vince Bridgers --- The corrected code successfully compiles. Basically, making sure the template specialization is in the correct namespace. namespace clang { class DynTypedNode { private: template struct

[Bug d/91600] "Architecture not supported" reported for MinGW-W64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91600 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/91595] Version (Windows) is not defined in GCC D Compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw --- *** Bug 91600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug d/91595] Version (Windows) is not defined in GCC D Compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91595 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- *** Bug 91666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug d/91666] _builtin function no work with GDC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91666 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/91600] "Architecture not supported" reported for MinGW-W64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91600 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- The following versions may be defined by the compiler on mingw targets Windows MinGW Win32 Win64 And on cygwin targets. Windows Cygwin Posix Druntime should compile fine if these exist.

[Bug c++/94255] New: template specialization in different namespace causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94255 Bug ID: 94255 Summary: template specialization in different namespace causes crash Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/93038] Missing dependencies in depfile for imported files at compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/93038] Missing dependencies in depfile for imported files at compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93038 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33 commit r10-7320-g4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Sun

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:27:03PM +, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 > > --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- > (In reply to kargl from comment

[Bug libstdc++/93245] std::experimental::filesystem::path::generic_string() doesn't normalize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93245 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a577c0c26931090e7c25e56ef5ffc807627961ec commit r10-7318-ga577c0c26931090e7c25e56ef5ffc807627961ec Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug middle-end/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 David Forgeas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.forgeas at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > So, what happens if you do use the required -fno-range-check > option? The code is compiled happily: $ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20200320.valgrind/bin/gfortran -c -Wall

[Bug libstdc++/94242] filesystem::path::generic_string() only works with std::allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94242 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug libstdc++/94242] filesystem::path::generic_string() only works with std::allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94242 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fc985118d9f5014afc1caf32a411ee5803fba61 commit r10-7317-g9fc985118d9f5014afc1caf32a411ee5803fba61 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/94254] New: [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254 Bug ID: 94254 Summary: [10 regression] r10-7312 causes compiler hangs Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Paco Arjonilla from comment #4) > There is no reason why an extra constructor would affect the semiregularity > of a type. That's not true. A private or deleted constructor that is a better

[Bug libstdc++/94244] std::sort corrupts memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94244 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- In other words, you have failed to meet the requirement that the comparison is a strict weak ordering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_ordering#Strict_weak_orderings

[Bug target/94253] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253 Bug ID: 94253 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b commit r10-7316-gdfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Sat

[Bug target/93694] Inconsistent grammar in darwin.opt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93694 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:837cece888f36543b6d326101362acb67ac3df0a commit r10-7315-g837cece888f36543b6d326101362acb67ac3df0a Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Sun

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- > It will be definitely caused by my g:c8429c2aba80f845939ffa6b2cfe8a0be1b50078. [...] > So is the reason usage of ld.gold? Is the default linker

[Bug c++/94252] New: Can't use a lambda in a requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94252 Bug ID: 94252 Summary: Can't use a lambda in a requires expression Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/94250] [10 Regression] valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > A nice catch David! I've got a patch for it. > > Thanks. I should also perhaps mention that testsuite file >

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/94250] [10 Regression] valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > A nice catch David! I've got a patch for it. Thanks. I should also perhaps mention that testsuite file ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-2.C has the same problem. It would

[Bug ipa/94250] [10 Regression] ]valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Component|c++

[Bug c++/94250] valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-21 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe

[Bug libgomp/94251] [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time / libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 48077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48077=edit (Partial patch): Patch for gomp_load_image_to_device to handle link_flag correctly [Cross ref: nvptx disables the

[Bug libgomp/94251] New: [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time / libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94251 Bug ID: 94251 Summary: [OpenMP] 'target link' fails at run time / libgomp.c/target-link-1.c fails on GCN Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94250] valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 --- Comment #2 from Nicholas Krause --- (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1) > After looking through the git history that last time this functions in your > trace were changed is by commit id, > db30281f0b2ff6dfc0c4146291baf020a27e4065.

[Bug c++/94250] valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 Nicholas Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz,

[Bug target/94248] [amdgcn] Doesn't build with RTL checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c++/94250] New: valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94250 Bug ID: 94250 Summary: valgrind error for ./g++.dg/ipa/remref-1.C Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/93983] std::filesystem::path is not concept-friendly

:semiregular); There is no reason why an extra constructor would affect the semiregularity of a type. $> g++ -std=c++20 In file included from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200321/include/c++/10.0.1/compare:39, from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20200321/include/c++/10.0.1/

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/62051] [8/9/10 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |11.0 --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug c++/94066] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE (starting/ending union member lifetime) in cxx_eval_bare_aggregate, at cp/constexpr.c:3790 since r6-7592

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94066 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a commit r10-7313-gb599bf9d6d1e180d350b71e51e08a66a1bb1546a Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c/94239] [10 regression] cc1 SEGV in get_location_from_adhoc_loc with gcc.dg/pr20245-1.c etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug lto/91028] [10 Regression] g++.dg/lto/alias-2 FAILs with -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- > I believe this was fixed a while ago by adding the loop. It no longer fails > with -fno-use-linker-plugin. Is it OK on Solaris? It no longer

[Bug lto/91028] [10 Regression] g++.dg/lto/alias-2 FAILs with -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug lto/94249] New: [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 Bug ID: 94249 Summary: [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/94249] [10 regression] Many -flto -fuse-linker-plugin tests FAIL: could not add symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/94248] New: [amdgcn] Doesn't build with RTL checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94248 Bug ID: 94248 Summary: [amdgcn] Doesn't build with RTL checking Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking Severity: normal

[Bug c/94247] Wrong char-subscripts warning for limited-range index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >and the compiler already knows this > Not when the warning is generated from the front-end. It does not know the > range of the char variable there. Ah, that

[Bug c/94247] Wrong char-subscripts warning for limited-range index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c/94247] New: Wrong char-subscripts warning for limited-range index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94247 Bug ID: 94247 Summary: Wrong char-subscripts warning for limited-range index Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/94246] New: valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 Bug ID: 94246 Summary: valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/94052] Paradoxical subregs out of expand causes ICE with multi register modes at -O2 or higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94052 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9 commit r10-7312-g497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c/94239] [10 regression] cc1 SEGV in get_location_from_adhoc_loc with gcc.dg/pr20245-1.c etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Jakub

[Bug ipa/94245] [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_find_agg_cst_for_param, at ipa-prop.c:3467 since r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94245 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/94245] New: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_find_agg_cst_for_param, at ipa-prop.c:3467 since r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94245 Bug ID: 94245 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in ipa_find_agg_cst_for_param, at ipa-prop.c:3467 since r10-7237-g4e3d3e40726e1b68 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: