https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483
Bug ID: 94483
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected
type_pack_expansion, have error_mark in add_capture,
at cp/lambda.c:607
Product: gcc
Version: 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86594
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92981
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67825
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #46 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f26e60c2600f0a676fc9370390ebf0a3c78f31c
commit r10-7548-g7f26e60c2600f0a676fc9370390ebf0a3c78f31c
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Apr 3 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94482
Bug ID: 94482
Summary: Inserting into vector with optimization enabled on x86
generates incorrect result
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c809f727cd2a6c70c307d9dd53d26dc84bf292a
commit r10-7547-g0c809f727cd2a6c70c307d9dd53d26dc84bf292a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92916
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92916
--- Comment #1 from Marc Streckfuß ---
This is fixed in https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace, if the changes
are also upstream, this bug can be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94481
Bug ID: 94481
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (in
cp_parser_placeholder_type_specifier)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94480
Bug ID: 94480
Summary: ICE in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at
cp/parser.c:31858
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
The problematic behavior of SRA is now fixed on master and both opened
release branches so I consider my work done here.
I'm leaving the bug opened in case Jeff wants to add some DSE limiter
like he wrote i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] pack |[8 Regression] pack
|e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b445ceec81ba3f4afad8c3ead1e58f14f1c2e146
commit r8-10163-gb445ceec81ba3f4afad8c3ead1e58f14f1c2e146
Author: Martin Jambor
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94476
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #10 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #6)
> Created attachment 48184 [details]
> GCC passes dumps
So according to that, in 105t.vrp1 it removes the branch and unconditionally
calls abort:
Folding statement: _4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94479
Bug ID: 94479
Summary: NetBSD: internal compiler error: in
recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91966
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70ae61692245b5002f32454c8447655ad65a8535
commit r9-8450-g70ae61692245b5002f32454c8447655ad65a8535
Author: Jason Merrill
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94467
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94467
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbcdf9bb3fd04adc59f41e4e1ff6293c84cbecc4
commit r10-7545-gbbcdf9bb3fd04adc59f41e4e1ff6293c84cbecc4
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Apr 3 11:4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92264
--- Comment #45 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b949f8e2acb49273b2f08ecaa3bc7128baaad850
commit r10-7544-gb949f8e2acb49273b2f08ecaa3bc7128baaad850
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Apr 3 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a13d6ec867e750169af95649235a6681f410464a
commit r10-7543-ga13d6ec867e750169af95649235a6681f410464a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93435
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1bb16994caed4dacf8c9ee1a33b177df140e9dc
commit r9-8449-ga1bb16994caed4dacf8c9ee1a33b177df140e9dc
Author: Martin Jambor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68394
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94478
Bug ID: 94478
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in comptypes, at cp/typeck.c:1486
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93641
--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'disconnect3d' Czarnota
---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> if the invoke.texi entry does not need a change, then this should now be
> fixed, correct?
It would be a good practice to fix the invoke.texi ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91966
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bcafd8748cf9eb83a9e71bf67c4e2a7c5c8f513c
commit r10-7542-gbcafd8748cf9eb83a9e71bf67c4e2a7c5c8f513c
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94460
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94460
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8020a5aafd02af1ccf99372d3d8052c40b59725
commit r10-7541-gb8020a5aafd02af1ccf99372d3d8052c40b59725
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94477
Bug ID: 94477
Summary: ICE in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.c:18181
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94476
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94476
Bug ID: 94476
Summary: NSDMI deferred parse
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94475
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE: tree |[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94475
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90356
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94475
Bug ID: 94475
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
element_mode, at tree.c:13813
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
--- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor ---
The following workaround works for the testcase but would need to be
generalized for a chain of former_decl_of's to be universal, I'm afraid:
diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.c b/gcc/cgraph.c
index 6b780f80eb3..241b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94467
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
The bug was introduced by r10-393:
commit 16ed2601ad0a4aa82f11e9df86ea92183f94f979
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed May 15 15:26:19 2019 +
i386: Emulate MMX pshufb with SSE version
Emulate MMX version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-03
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94474
Bug ID: 94474
Summary: Incorrect DWARF range information for inlined function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94473
Florin Iucha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94443
Florin Iucha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florin.iucha at amd dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94468
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
I had a quick look at the untested fix and there seemed to be
about six copies of pretty much the same expression.
Would it be worthwhile to invent a new macro or small function
and call it from six differ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92989
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92989
--- Comment #10 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Richard, could you please have a look again?
OK, I'll try to get to this early next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94473
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94473
Bug ID: 94473
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8)
> Do we have compile farm machine where this can be reproduced?
I guess we don't have any.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93211
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51ecad3c0327418c6e20ef47c6c5a8015bb99b2c
commit r10-7540-g51ecad3c0327418c6e20ef47c6c5a8015bb99b2c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93211
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51ecad3c0327418c6e20ef47c6c5a8015bb99b2c
commit r10-7540-g51ecad3c0327418c6e20ef47c6c5a8015bb99b2c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Do we have compile farm machine where this can be reproduced?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 94317, which changed state.
Bug 94317 Summary: gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94468
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93960
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93960
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afae9879c28a2797c49bf2da51415da70cdd2b83
commit r8-10162-gafae9879c28a2797c49bf2da51415da70cdd2b83
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94472
Bug ID: 94472
Summary: 400.perlbench is slower when compiled at -O2 with both
PGO and LTO on AMD Zen CPUs
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94471
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94396
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53161358180fdc2c2c21c8f46bbdd339a1fbb8ae
commit r10-7537-g53161358180fdc2c2c21c8f46bbdd339a1fbb8ae
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94471
Bug ID: 94471
Summary: Calling a function pointer member of a polymorphic
derived type returning a pointer produces an ICE
(internal compiler error).
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48182|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94465
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48187
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48187&action=edit
gcc10-pr94461-wip2.patch
Here is what I have right now and it passes make check-{gcc,c++-all}
RUNTESTFLAGS='--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 48186
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48186&action=edit
An incomplete patch
Jakub, this is an incomplete patch with 2 testcases. Can you take it over?
I will fix PR 94467.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94470
Bug ID: 94470
Summary: Constexpr variable initialization with self-modifying
constructor incorrectly rejected since r7-6728
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 48185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48185&action=edit
qemu execution trace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 48184
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48184&action=edit
GCC passes dumps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
Created attachment 48183
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48183&action=edit
executable asm from objdump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94465
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef6631051d4bb9519f3f0dd5f3b3eadbd67bc10a
commit r10-7536-gef6631051d4bb9519f3f0dd5f3b3eadbd67bc10a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #10)
> I'll file the actual ada example.
PR94469 - "lto abstract variable emitted as concrete decl (ada test-case)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93621
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor ---
It turns out that no, recursive inlining will happily put an adjusted and not
yet adjusted call into the same function which was formerly a thunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94469
Bug ID: 94469
Summary: lto abstract variable emitted as concrete decl (ada
test-case)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
>
> --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It doesn't work as is though, looking at it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
--- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94450
> >
> > --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48182
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48182&action=edit
gcc10-pr94461-wip.patch
What I'm proposing is essentially this patch (+ the testcase of course).
Or, instead o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94468
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Minimal command line options:
$ g++ pr94468.cc -O2 -c -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94468
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93597
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Yes, will do it today, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> So, I believe the r10-400-gecfdb16c54ad06ac23193e5de292fc71e5958526 change
> has been incorrect.
> We should revert those i386-builtin.def changes, and instead treat bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94461
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I believe the r10-400-gecfdb16c54ad06ac23193e5de292fc71e5958526 change has
been incorrect.
We should revert those i386-builtin.def changes, and instead treat builtins
with sole OPTION_MASK_ISA_MMX (and no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94467
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94443
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 94443, which changed state.
Bug 94443 Summary: [10 Regression] 510.parest_r and 526.blender_r ICE:
verify_ssa failed since r10-7491-gbd0f22a8d5caea8905f38ff1fafce31c1b7d33ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94443
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Can we close it as fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94467
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Either one has to replace the builtins manually afterwards back with
corresponding intrinsics (something I've done e.g. in the PR94460 patch), or
one could e.g. creduce on mostly preprocessed source where con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94468
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo