[Bug tree-optimization/95401] New: GCC produces incorrect instruction with -O3 for skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95401 Bug ID: 95401 Summary: GCC produces incorrect instruction with -O3 for skylake-avx512 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95400] New: -march=native and -march=icelake-client produce different results on icelake client

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95400 Bug ID: 95400 Summary: -march=native and -march=icelake-client produce different results on icelake client Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95399] New: [ARM, AArch64] 32/64-bit vcvtnq_* functions are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95399 Bug ID: 95399 Summary: [ARM, AArch64] 32/64-bit vcvtnq_* functions are missing Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 --- Comment #8 from Manfred Schwarb --- I even tried "char tmp[2*GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN+800];" but it still fails.

[Bug preprocessor/94657] [patch] libcpp uses 'AR = ar' tool even if --build/--host are passed explicitly.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94657 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #13 from Asher Gordon --- Do you think that it would be possible to add something like Sparse's -Wno-universal-initializer and use it by default? As Linus says here[1], Sparse defaults tend to be kernel-centric, but I don't think

[Bug c++/95328] structured binding of template type inside template function is reported as "incomplete class type"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95328 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d8d5ddb539a5254c7ef83414377f4c74c7701d4 commit r11-706-g3d8d5ddb539a5254c7ef83414377f4c74c7701d4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/95398] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95398 --- Comment #1 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Code posted at > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/mW1gV6tyxXk Here's the code implicit none

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > can we have a backtrace? > > Working on it. I'm at the point now where I can invoke

[Bug fortran/95398] New: ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95398 Bug ID: 95398 Summary: ICE on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee:

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #12 from Asher Gordon --- (In reply to Luc Van Oostenryck from comment #11) > Sparse already has this option. Also, I don't think it would help here since > from I understand the OP want these warnings but not if they're caused by >

[Bug fortran/95397] New: [Fortran/OpenACC] Wrong results with 'loop vector' inside 'routine'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95397 Bug ID: 95397 Summary: [Fortran/OpenACC] Wrong results with 'loop vector' inside 'routine' Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #11 from Luc Van Oostenryck --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > GCC uses -Wno-designated-init to disable the warning (this option has been > there included for a while)? Do you think sparse could add/use the same >

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Luc Van Oostenryck from comment #9) > In fact, sparse already support the suppression of the warning via the > option '-Wno-universal-initializer'. > > It's really very recent and thus only in

[Bug tree-optimization/95396] New: GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95396 Bug ID: 95396 Summary: GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/95369] braced-init-list with designated initializers as template-argument rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95369 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-28

[Bug target/95259] Duplicated codes in libgcc, driver-i386.c and i386-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug fortran/95373] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_reference_type, at tree.c:7942

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/95373] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_reference_type, at tree.c:7942

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c715e6a2990cfb6c15acc1ee14219523534ec69 commit r11-705-g5c715e6a2990cfb6c15acc1ee14219523534ec69 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95393] Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393 --- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier --- Hm, I've just done some further testing and it appears that it only occurs for me on x86 when I have `-msse4.1` on the command line, in which case it doesn't optimize it to `return s;`, but instead does a

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d607ecbf125551513e182a181ca9c6e25dc7609 commit r9-8633-g0d607ecbf125551513e182a181ca9c6e25dc7609 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug middle-end/95395] gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95395 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug middle-end/95395] New: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95395 Bug ID: 95395 Summary: gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/95353] [10/11 Regression] spurious -Wstringop-overflow writing to a trailing array plus offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0 Summary|[10/11

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1396ee72e68cc8fba99ce986f2910cd39e335b8 commit r10-8202-ge1396ee72e68cc8fba99ce986f2910cd39e335b8 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ce3d791dfcba469e709935aba5743640f7d4959 commit r11-704-g6ce3d791dfcba469e709935aba5743640f7d4959 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug go/95389] Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Teichert --- Yes, the string "vendor/k8s.x2eio/code-generator/pkg/util" is the content of the PkgPath() from "vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/pkg/util".

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 Luc Van Oostenryck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/94926] [9/10/11 regression] invalid use of incomplete type not recogniced for static self reference of templated struct since r9-297-g683be2f77b3ce4db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|9.4

[Bug c++/94926] [9/10/11 regression] invalid use of incomplete type not recogniced for static self reference of templated struct since r9-297-g683be2f77b3ce4db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b599b9f9a1e036ff75a4daa06ac7036c6ebbe01 commit r11-703-g7b599b9f9a1e036ff75a4daa06ac7036c6ebbe01 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug libstdc++/95322] std::list | take | transform, expression does not work cbegin() == end()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #7) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > > A new LWG issue has been submitted, and there is a suggested resolution. > > Will take care and inform in

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/95252] testcase gcc.dg/torture/pr67916.c failure when testing with -msave-restore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252 --- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson --- I've got 3 new g++ testsuite failures. So we might still need an exact list of USEs. I hadn't thought about RVE. That will have to be checked also. RV32/RV64 shouldn't matter, as the mode in the USEs

[Bug tree-optimization/95391] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/vshift-5.c since r11-689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391 --- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer --- Also causes gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c to ICE in the same spot.

[Bug target/95361] Segfault when generating an epilogue for a partly-shrinked-wrapped SVE frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95361 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c082cb8a2523d8c5afe5710e265bc72dd71aa60b commit r10-8201-gc082cb8a2523d8c5afe5710e265bc72dd71aa60b Author: Richard

[Bug go/95389] Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- To be clear, are you seeing this in the value returned by reflect.Type.PkgPath()? Or is it showing up somewhere else? Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/95393] Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- It does optimize for me with -O2 or -O3. It could optimize earlier though, by the end of gimple, we are still trying to return max(s,0).

[Bug libstdc++/95392] [11 Regression] Build failure on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug libstdc++/95392] [11 Regression] Build failure on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #5) > gdb shows: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #0 0xf7aa5162 in

[Bug target/95256] [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 since r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?

[Bug target/95211] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_unop_insn, at optabs.c:3622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?

[Bug rtl-optimization/95394] New: [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95394 Bug ID: 95394 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/95390] _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48630 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48630=edit gcc11-pr95390.patch Untested fix.

[Bug libstdc++/95392] New: Build failure on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95392 Bug ID: 95392 Summary: Build failure on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/95393] New: Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393 Bug ID: 95393 Summary: Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95368] gcc things that a lambda capture is both const and mutable

++ (GCC) 10.1.1 20200507 (Red Hat 10.1.1-1): Rejects it: test.cc:17:14: error: passing ‘const foo’ as ‘this’ argument discards qualifiers [-fpermissive] * gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200528 Rejects it: test.cc:17:14: error: passing ‘const foo’ as ‘this’ argument discards qualifiers

[Bug c++/93698] ICE on concept using generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93698 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/92652] function call to lambda expression that return true does not satisfy the constraint in requires-clause if using return type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92652 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95391] New: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/vshift-5.c since r11-689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391 Bug ID: 95391 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/vshift-5.c since r11-689 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/95390] _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/95390] New: _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 Bug ID: 95390 Summary: _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #8 from Asher Gordon --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #7) > The feature was added specifically to mimic what sparse does. > If sparse changes, I think changing gcc would be appropriate. I just report a bug to Sparse here:

[Bug go/95389] New: Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389 Bug ID: 95389 Summary: Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/95181] [10/11 Regression] ICE in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:241 since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95181 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Asher Gordon from comment #6) > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) > > Since this warning is intended to work like sparse, introducing > > a divergence here would seem to make the feature

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #6 from Asher Gordon --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) > Since this warning is intended to work like sparse, introducing > a divergence here would seem to make the feature less useful, > in fact subverting the point of

[Bug tree-optimization/95353] [10/11 Regression] GCC can't build binutils

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I test my warning changes with binutils and --enable-targets=all. But that apparently doesn't compile all source files, and I don't have a cross-build setup in place (or the resources to do it). If someone

[Bug c++/95388] New: C++20 & 17 Lambda capture of *this by Value causes ICE "in tsubst_decl at cp/pt.c"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95388 Bug ID: 95388 Summary: C++20 & 17 Lambda capture of *this by Value causes ICE "in tsubst_decl at cp/pt.c" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 --- Comment #3 from Jiří Paleček --- Created attachment 48629 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48629=edit Original code which fails to compile

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 --- Comment #2 from Jiří Paleček --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Was the original code a valid code? > It seems the reduced code is invalid. Yes at least I believe so. I will attach the original code, it is not big. Note that

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a commit r9-8632-ge211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug debug/95387] New: inconsistent behaviors at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95387 Bug ID: 95387 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -Os Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 Antoine Lemoine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-in

[Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Bug ID: 95386 Summary: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95384] Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384 --- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin --- Here's a simpler example: https://godbolt.org/z/FD7uEQ If the engaged member is an int instead of a bool (to remove the tail padding), gcc generates better code. This follows up on "PR 95383"

[Bug c++/95385] GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95385 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-28

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)> > > Can you please share some statistics how big are the files and how many > > runs do you merge? > > There were on

[Bug c++/95385] New: GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95385 Bug ID: 95385 Summary: GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95384] New: Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384 Bug ID: 95384 Summary: Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93698] ICE on concept using generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93698 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivan.pogrebnyak at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/95324] Segmentation fault when using variadic lambda template in concept definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95324 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/95383] New: Poor codegen when constructing a trivial Optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95383 Bug ID: 95383 Summary: Poor codegen when constructing a trivial Optional Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/94128] ICE on C++20 "requires requires" with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f commit r10-8200-gf2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f Author: Mark

[Bug target/95285] AArch64:aarch64 medium code model proposal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95285 --- Comment #15 from Wilco --- (In reply to Bu Le from comment #14) > > > Anyway, my point is that the size of single data does't affact the fact > > > that > > > medium code model is missing in aarch64 and aarch64 is lack of PIC large > > >

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > can we have a backtrace? Working on it.

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #34 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #33) > It would be relatively easy if the target supports unaligned access. like > read64ne in > https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=blob;f=src/liblzma/common/memcmplen.h >

[Bug debug/95343] IPA-SRA can result in wrong debug info about removed function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95343 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch series on the mailing list to address PR 93385 and the last patch in it also addresses this issue and allows gdb to print the correct value of the removed parameter:

[Bug tree-optimization/95113] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3) > > Indeed, -fno-ipa-sra fixes it. So, a duplicate of PR93385? Similar, but not quite the same. I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/95382] New: [haifa-sched][DO_PREDICATION] execution test: wrong scheduling result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95382 Bug ID: 95382 Summary: [haifa-sched][DO_PREDICATION] execution test: wrong scheduling result. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #35 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch series that deals with this issue, including proper adjustments to debug info, on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546702.html

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec commit r11-693-g3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- OK, so vectorizable_shift doing else if (dt[1] == vect_constant_def) { /* Convert the scalar constant shift amounts in-place. */ slp_tree

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Reopening as the following is ICEing: $ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95356.c -c -O3 -mavx512dq during GIMPLE pass: slp

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/95361] Segfault when generating an epilogue for a partly-shrinked-wrapped SVE frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95361 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ccbfffb0fb614f09cf2b7b70f152d6e489cfd17 commit r11-691-g1ccbfffb0fb614f09cf2b7b70f152d6e489cfd17 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c++/95311] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_member_call at gcc/cp/cp-ubsan.c:136 since r11-578-g72af65b91cc2a2eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95311 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/95355] [11 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand size mismatch for `vpmovzxbd' with -masm=intel since r11-485-gf6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c58dbf359479bc4cbfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95355 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31d827e98ab32060ef522fa5f3e42c1175e1a439 commit r10-8198-g31d827e98ab32060ef522fa5f3e42c1175e1a439 Author: Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/95381] New: [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 Bug ID: 95381 Summary: [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL:

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26a42e9df9689765831f018eb14f1ae885212335 commit r10-8197-g26a42e9df9689765831f018eb14f1ae885212335 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #23 from Vittorio Zecca --- The update proposed in comment #18 fixed the issue. Thank you!

[Bug tree-optimization/95273] [11 regression] many ICEs after r11-564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95273] [11 regression] many ICEs after r11-564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf commit r11-687-g09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf Author: Richard Biener Date:

  1   2   >