[Bug target/96072] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in add_reg_note)

2020-07-05 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
: Segmentation fault 24 | } | ^ 0xe74ba6 crash_signal /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200705/work/gcc-11-20200705/gcc/toplev.c:328 0xe09f99 add_reg_note(rtx_def*, reg_note, rtx_def*) /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc

[Bug fortran/96071] New: ICE in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4233

2020-07-05 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
951: internal compiler error: in matching_typebound_op, at fortran/interface.c:4233 0x599046 matching_typebound_op /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200705/work/gcc-11-20200705/gcc/fortran/interface.c:4233 0x87e754 gfc_extend_expr(gfc_expr*) /var/tmp/port

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [8/9/10/11 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

2020-07-05 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
9 0x9196b6 handle_pragma_pop_options /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200705/work/gcc-11-20200705/gcc/c-family/c-pragma.c:1090 0x895510 c_parser_pragma /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200705/work/gcc-11-20200705/gcc/c/

[Bug libstdc++/96070] New: std::views::* won't work with non-legacy iterators

2020-07-05 Thread gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96070 Bug ID: 96070 Summary: std::views::* won't work with non-legacy iterators Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

2020-07-05 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 --- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool --- This is pre-approved with a testcase (if it fixes that testcase, etc., yadda yadda). Thanks!

[Bug fortran/89574] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3792

2020-07-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Two slightly reduced testcase variants that ICE with current master: % cat pr89574-red1.f90 module mod contains subroutine init end subroutine end module mod module init use mod, only :

[Bug fortran/96069] New: -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran

2020-07-05 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96069 Bug ID: 96069 Summary: -ffile-prefix-map does not affect print in gfortran Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/96062] Partial register stall caused by avoidable use of SETcc, and useless MOVZBL

2020-07-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96062 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Joseph C. Sible from comment #0) > Consider this C code: > > long ps4_syscall0(long n) { > long ret; > int carry; > __asm__ __volatile__( > "syscall" > : "=a"(ret),

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

2020-07-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 88379, which changed state. Bug 88379 Summary: [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

2020-07-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 88379, which changed state. Bug 88379 Summary: [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

2020-07-05 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

2020-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56ce663146b436ff1a267ee2a9701b7d5e190e62 commit r8-10344-g56ce663146b436ff1a267ee2a9701b7d5e190e62 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/88379] [8/9 Regression] [Coarray] ICE with allocatable coarray, class and associate in resolve_assoc_var, at fortran/resolve.c:8750

2020-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88379 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e9e0dab7a1dd9003269a8663117135f9ad91a94 commit r9-8720-g4e9e0dab7a1dd9003269a8663117135f9ad91a94 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/27318] gfortran should warn if a interface does not match

2020-07-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/29670] [meta-bug] fortran interfaces

2020-07-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29670 Bug 29670 depends on bug 27318, which changed state. Bug 27318 Summary: gfortran should warn if a interface does not match https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27318] gfortran should warn if a interface does not match

2020-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc9a9229285a26ac12bc8de53237ce9c4d42f867 commit r11-1814-gcc9a9229285a26ac12bc8de53237ce9c4d42f867 Author: Thomas Koenig Date:

[Bug fortran/96018] Optimization issue with external HDF5 library

2020-07-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Comment on attachment 48817 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48817 Minimal example to demonstrate the issue. Hm, I cannot reproduce this because I do not have the hdf5 library installed.

[Bug fortran/95366] [10/11 Regression] TYPE IS(character(*)) no longer matches since r10-3605-gf61e54e59cda5a2e

2020-07-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95366 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95366] [10/11 Regression] TYPE IS(character(*)) no longer matches since r10-3605-gf61e54e59cda5a2e

2020-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95366 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:858b288d2a6afc2f71f817344be3af4b7c3d4b3f commit r10-8427-g858b288d2a6afc2f71f817344be3af4b7c3d4b3f Author: Thomas

[Bug c++/96068] New: Extra semicolon outside of a function should be allowed after c++11?

2020-07-05 Thread haoxintu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96068 Bug ID: 96068 Summary: Extra semicolon outside of a function should be allowed after c++11? Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug jit/96067] New: __atomic_compare_exchange_n should return bool instead of void

2020-07-05 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96067 Bug ID: 96067 Summary: __atomic_compare_exchange_n should return bool instead of void Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug jit/96066] New: Cannot use values from some builtins because they are of void type

2020-07-05 Thread bouanto at zoho dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066 Bug ID: 96066 Summary: Cannot use values from some builtins because they are of void type Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96065] Move elision of returned automatic variable doesn't happen the variable is enclosed in a block

2020-07-05 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96065 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

2020-07-05 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b7.10110111 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

2020-07-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #10) > I think this will work but haven't had a chance to try it except on the one > power 7 system. Hi Bill - thanks for the patch. This allowed bootstrap to complete

[Bug c++/96065] New: Move elision of returned automatic variable doesn't happen the variable is enclosed in a block

2020-07-05 Thread b7.10110111 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96065 Bug ID: 96065 Summary: Move elision of returned automatic variable doesn't happen the variable is enclosed in a block Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/96064] New: Defaulted constexpr spaceship operator triggers internal compiler error after including utility

2020-07-05 Thread milasudril at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96064 Bug ID: 96064 Summary: Defaulted constexpr spaceship operator triggers internal compiler error after including utility Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED