https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
Miko Vich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexmudmiko at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
--- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This regression was introduced by:
commit d7e20130650fb46d71e0403652e4e07bc14f9775 (refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Justin Squirek
Date: Mon Aug 10 12:05:07 2020 -0400
[Ada] Reimplementation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend ---
I know it's acceptable to overload a type name with one or more functions --
from 12.4.3.4.1 of the F2008 standard,
"A generic name may be the same as a derived-type name, in which case all of
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96045
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6037ebeff1cd76385e88dd9cbcaf68ada85316fb
commit r11-6343-g6037ebeff1cd76385e88dd9cbcaf68ada85316fb
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98450
Bug ID: 98450
Summary: Inconsistent Wunused-variable warning for std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
So this can be simplified to
void f (unsigned long *p, int r, int i)
{
int b = 64, n = r % 64;
while (i >= 0 && b >= 0)
{
if (b <= n)
p[i--] = 1UL << b;
b -= n;
}
}
Here,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
And the warning is triggered with the initial "b = 63", but not "b = 62" and
smaller values.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Note: The warning occurs when the compiler knows that b < 63 in the "if" case
(it occurs up to "n = r % 64", but not with "n = r % 65") so that the condition
"b + 1 >= 64" is always false. I suppose that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7256c8260afa313e019fd531574ad33ec49b9f6
commit r11-6342-gc7256c8260afa313e019fd531574ad33ec49b9f6
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97424
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98447
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
This is probably due to commit 5e00ad3ffbfb4df7242c313a0d836f5b538eb2fb (where
this warning was introduced, as requested by PR97424).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #39 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0175d45d14b1f9ebc4c15ea5bafcda655c37fc35
commit r11-6341-g0175d45d14b1f9ebc4c15ea5bafcda655c37fc35
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
Bug ID: 98449
Summary: notify_all_at_thread_exit() should notify on cond
while lock is held to avoid a race
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
Bug ID: 98448
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap-O3 comparison fails due to
libcody
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98445
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-26
15 matches
Mail list logo
