https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189
Davin McCall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davmac at davmac dot org
--- Comment #28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 04:12:27AM +, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> Patch regresses several test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch regresses several test cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98497
Bug ID: 98497
Summary: [Potential Perf regression] jne to hot branch instead
je to cold
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98493
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986
--- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
...
> So I'd say the code in comment#0 is invalid, although the compiler is not
> required to diagnose this.
>
> If you agree, we will close the issue as INVALID.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89891
Bug 89891 depends on bug 98263, which changed state.
Bug 98263 Summary: valgrind error in gfc_find_derived_vtab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96986
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
F2018 has:
! 15.4.2.2 Explicit interface
! Within the scope of a procedure identifier, the procedure shall have an
! explicit interface if it is not a statement function and
! (3) the procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] wrong code |wrong code at -O1 on
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20210101
../../../src/libgo/go/runtime/os_gccgo.go:43:12: error: reference to undefined
name 'startupRandomData'
43
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d816b0c144d15e6570eb5b124b9f3ccbe3d40082
commit r11-6405-gd816b0c144d15e6570eb5b124b9f3ccbe3d40082
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98473
--- Comment #2 from Borislav Stanimirov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> To meet the requirements of the standard we would need to insert them at the
> end and then use std::rotate to reposition them.
Or, to save move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> Hah! I am probably a week or two from getting to it. I have been working my
> way through a backlog but have been held up for some days by unlimited
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96746
Masamitsu MURASE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98495
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98495
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98438
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98206
--- Comment #6 from Roland B ---
Great!
This also works well in the original (more complex) scenario
(https://github.com/rbock/sqlpp11/issues/355).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> > Paul,
> >
> > are you still working on this?
>
> Paul,
>
> this is still one of yours...
Hi Harald,
Hah! I am probably a week or two from getting to it. I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Quick update. The bug actually occurs with "--disable-bootstrap" which is how
Matthias Klose configures gcc when building the gcc-snapshot package. Removing
the configure flag makes the
28 matches
Mail list logo
