[Bug c++/98750] does not detect dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98750 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/98761] [modules] use of a module causes SIGSEGV at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98761 --- Comment #1 from Boris Kolpackov --- Created attachment 50011 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50011=edit Reproducer

[Bug c++/98761] New: [modules] use of a module causes SIGSEGV at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98761 Bug ID: 98761 Summary: [modules] use of a module causes SIGSEGV at runtime Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 --- Comment #4 from Christoph --- Created attachment 50010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50010=edit C++ file generated by Bison run with -E Including all dependencies, created by GCC 11 with added -E

[Bug c++/98742] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in finish_omp_clauses, at cp/semantics.c:7435 since r11-6752-ga6d22fb21c6f1ad7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98742 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ab1abf3b82a3bcfff9b7bc596166fef6a0d83ab commit r11-6810-g7ab1abf3b82a3bcfff9b7bc596166fef6a0d83ab Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug testsuite/98757] New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c05cdfb3f6335d55226cef7917a783498aa41244 commit r11-6809-gc05cdfb3f6335d55226cef7917a783498aa41244 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug fortran/98476] OpenMP offload syntax restriction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98476 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c05cdfb3f6335d55226cef7917a783498aa41244 commit r11-6809-gc05cdfb3f6335d55226cef7917a783498aa41244 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug testsuite/98757] New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/98758] [9/10/11 Regression] ice in lambda_matrix_right_hermite by r9-3927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98758 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P3

[Bug testsuite/98757] New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug debug/98755] [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98755 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The issue is that we isolate a path that is impossible to take but on that path we have p = free (p); and thus a "proved" mistake. But in reality it is guarded by an effective if (false) condition. So

[Bug c++/98760] [modules] ICE in add_module_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98760 --- Comment #1 from Boris Kolpackov --- Created attachment 50009 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50009=edit Reproducer

[Bug c++/98760] New: [modules] ICE in add_module_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98760 Bug ID: 98760 Summary: [modules] ICE in add_module_decl Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 Akim Demaille changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/98759] New: arm cortex-r5 single precisions flotaing point generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98759 Bug ID: 98759 Summary: arm cortex-r5 single precisions flotaing point generation Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/98758] [9/10/11 Regression] ice in lambda_matrix_right_hermite by r9-3927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98758 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ice in |[9/10/11 Regression] ice in

[Bug target/98065] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7024 since r11-5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065 --- Comment #4 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, my patch https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555906.html could fix this, but below two of them is still pending for approval, I pinged it 5 times since last Oct. @Segher

[Bug middle-end/98266] [11 Regression] bogus array subscript is partly outside array bounds on virtual inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98266 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/98646] [11 Regression] A static_cast confuses -Wnonnull, causing false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > A better one: > > // PR c++/98646 > // { dg-do compile } > // { dg-options "-Wnonnull" } > > struct B { > void foo(); > }; > > struct D : B { > void

[Bug debug/98751] [11 Regression] libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/98751] [11 Regression] libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b83604c75fee324cc4767d039178cba2fbbe017e commit r11-6808-gb83604c75fee324cc4767d039178cba2fbbe017e Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/98758] [11 Regression] ice in lambda_matrix_right_hermite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98758 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/98758] New: ice in lambda_matrix_right_hermite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98758 Bug ID: 98758 Summary: ice in lambda_matrix_right_hermite Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/96511] Incorrect placement-new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96511 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug target/98549] [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9938 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49996|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug translation/93759] Invalid % in param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759 --- Comment #7 from Roland Illig --- Is there still something to do for this bug? de.po looks good now, having "c-no-format" instead of "c-format".

[Bug testsuite/98757] New: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98757 Bug ID: 98757 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90 in r11-6787 fails with excess error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98659] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in maybe_instantiate_noexcept, at cp/pt.c:25445 since r11-6476-gaf362af18f405c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98659 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98659] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in maybe_instantiate_noexcept, at cp/pt.c:25445 since r11-6476-gaf362af18f405c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98659 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b27f37f90cb66e277b734c605639e2f00a2e942 commit r11-6804-g2b27f37f90cb66e277b734c605639e2f00a2e942 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/98756] New: Suspicious "(*this)." in mangled symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98756 Bug ID: 98756 Summary: Suspicious "(*this)." in mangled symbol Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/98687] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in diagnose_name_conflict, at cp/name-lookup.c:2729 since r11-6652-g796ead19f85372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/98664] inconsistent --Wfree-nonheap-object for inlined calls to system headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98664 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98687] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘overload’ in diagnose_name_conflict, at cp/name-lookup.c:2729 since r11-6652-g796ead19f85372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98687 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d89b00c095e99cd5cb6d3e05f30d3a61fa592000 commit r11-6802-gd89b00c095e99cd5cb6d3e05f30d3a61fa592000 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug middle-end/98664] inconsistent --Wfree-nonheap-object for inlined calls to system headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98664 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9693e255ee2536c6823640eba5d0163c2b401161 commit r11-6801-g9693e255ee2536c6823640eba5d0163c2b401161 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug debug/98755] New: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98755 Bug ID: 98755 Summary: [11 regression] r11-6755 causes failure in g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/constexpr-var-1.C Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/98754] gnatmake no longer recognizes -P option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98754 --- Comment #3 from Eric Reischer --- (Or some other more descriptive error indicating "gprbuild" was not found on the path, rather than acting as though you have borked the command-line options.)

[Bug ada/98754] gnatmake no longer recognizes -P option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98754 --- Comment #2 from Eric Reischer --- In that case, this is not a RESOLVED WONTFIX -- this is still open. The documentation and output of "gnatmake --help" need to be updated to reflect the fact this is no longer a valid command line option.

[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29853c653245c37ed31b6abcc9799b534372e938 commit r11-6800-g29853c653245c37ed31b6abcc9799b534372e938 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/58993] incorrectly accept access of protected member method from derived class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58993 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29853c653245c37ed31b6abcc9799b534372e938 commit r11-6800-g29853c653245c37ed31b6abcc9799b534372e938 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug ada/98754] gnatmake no longer recognizes -P option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98754 Arnaud Charlet changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX CC|

[Bug debug/98751] [11 Regression] libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Priority|P3

[Bug debug/98728] [11 regression] Several debug tests FAIL with DWARF-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98728 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1) > Maybe this bug should be split in two (or three) for each specific FAIL? > > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > > With the switch to DWARF-5, two debug

[Bug ada/98754] New: gnatmake no longer recognizes -P option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98754 Bug ID: 98754 Summary: gnatmake no longer recognizes -P option Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug c++/98753] -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/94751] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid code in maybe_instantiate_noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94751 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Actually Comment 3 test is unrelated to the original issue here. Comment 3 will be fixed by my PR98659 fix, but not the original issue.

[Bug c++/94751] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid code in maybe_instantiate_noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94751 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I posted a patch for this which fixes this test too.

[Bug c++/98333] [10 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at tree.c:6593 since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/93821] Define __cplusplus to 202002L in C++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/98333] [10/11 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at tree.c:6593 since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c37f1d4081f5a19e39192d13e2a3acea13662e5a commit r11-6799-gc37f1d4081f5a19e39192d13e2a3acea13662e5a Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/98752] wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > But if we can fix it, I'd think it would be worth an exception. Given the fix would likely only affect C++20 code, I think that would be reasonable.

[Bug debug/98751] libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98752] wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/98752] wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98530] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/string-1_b.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98530 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- sigh, not a broken header, it is a broken compiler

[Bug c++/98753] New: -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98753 Bug ID: 98753 Summary: -Wfree-nonheap-object on Bison generated code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98625] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:977:15: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98625 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/91640] [9 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (contiguous expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91640] [9 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed (contiguous expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9aa61202d2d2f54b3eca473f78b7494c1e67c3c0 commit r9-9190-g9aa61202d2d2f54b3eca473f78b7494c1e67c3c0 Author: Tobias Burnus

[Bug c++/98625] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:977:15: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98625 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- > only >> 4 and << 8 shifts going on there. The thing is here that -1 is being shifted. That's undefined, you likely want to do shifting in an unsigned type and later cast to an unsigned type.

[Bug c++/98752] New: wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98752 Bug ID: 98752 Summary: wrong "error: ‘this’ is not a constant expression" with consteval constructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98645] C++ modules support does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/98751] libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- s/generations/generation/g

[Bug debug/98751] New: libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98751 Bug ID: 98751 Summary: libgccjit fails in DWARF 5 handling with "`.Ldebug_loc2' is already defined" asm error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/98722] [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004 since r11-6615-gcf2ac1c30af0fa783c8d72e527904dda5d8cc330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98722 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > It happens for s390x target, so you will need to build a cross compiler with: > --target=s390x-linux-gnu. Thank you, Martin. I've reproduced it on s390x.

[Bug c++/98750] does not detect dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98750 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/98625] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:977:15: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98625 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- This looks like a ubsan or optimizer bug. I can't see a -ve shift in the source: HOST_WIDE_INT bytes_in::wi () { HOST_WIDE_INT v = 0; if (const char *ptr = read (1)) { v = *ptr & 0xff;

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 98624, which changed state. Bug 98624 Summary: UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 What

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e6f3ed47e5cb575819f8253e42313664b89b042 commit r11-6797-g6e6f3ed47e5cb575819f8253e42313664b89b042 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/98722] [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004 since r11-6615-gcf2ac1c30af0fa783c8d72e527904dda5d8cc330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98722 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- It happens for s390x target, so you will need to build a cross compiler with: --target=s390x-linux-gnu.

[Bug rtl-optimization/98722] [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004 since r11-6615-gcf2ac1c30af0fa783c8d72e527904dda5d8cc330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98722 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Sorry, I can not reproduce this on today trunk using reint.cpp test. I guess it is x86-64. I am using the following configuration (meaning with enabled checking)

[Bug target/98729] [11 Regression] GCC 11 MinGW Windows build doesn't generate working PE executables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98729 --- Comment #7 from Brecht Sanders --- Adding flag `-gdwarf-4` to the above command still results in a file that won't execute, see attached file `conftest-gdwarf-4.exe`

[Bug target/98729] [11 Regression] GCC 11 MinGW Windows build doesn't generate working PE executables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98729 --- Comment #6 from Brecht Sanders --- Created attachment 50004 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50004=edit test built with -gdwarf-4

[Bug tree-optimization/98512] [11 Regression] “#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored” ineffective in conjunction with alias attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98512 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus warning stringop-overread wuth -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/98750] New: does not detect dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98750 Bug ID: 98750 Summary: does not detect dead code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug libstdc++/98731] s390x: Large classes of std::bitset and std::vector hash the same

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98731 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes the problem is that a bitset<2> uses the two least significant bits of an unsigned long, so we want to hash a single byte. But we take the address of the unsigned long and then hash the first byte. For

[Bug ipa/92932] Optimizers generate wrong code due to aggressive data optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92932 Bug 92932 depends on bug 92294, which changed state. Bug 92294 Summary: alias attribute generates incorrect code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294 What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/92294] alias attribute generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/92294] alias attribute generates incorrect code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a2a38620cf178b53b217051f32d1d7bbba86fc9 commit r11-6796-g6a2a38620cf178b53b217051f32d1d7bbba86fc9 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug testsuite/91799] [10/11 regression] r273245 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr88233.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91799 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Will Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04cdb132020733bedc36d14d61cce4246b8bbe4c commit r11-6795-g04cdb132020733bedc36d14d61cce4246b8bbe4c Author: Will Schmidt Date:

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 --- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > I see, so it's a real issue and I support the workaround mentioned in > Comment 10. > Please send it to the mailing list. Patch posted:

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 --- Comment #16 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #14) > I just ran into the same problem, with a slightly different testcase: This is a better one to reproduce the issue, thanks! I verified the

[Bug c++/89381] [8 Regression] Implicit copy constructor cannot be generated after unrelated class definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89381 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/86494] Usage in unevaluated context causes compile time errors because of implicit deletion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86494 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Drat sorry, meant to write PR89381.. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89381 ***

[Bug c++/89831] [8 Regression] passing 'const ...' as 'this' argument discards qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89831 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/86494] Usage in unevaluated context causes compile time errors because of implicit deletion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86494 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/60531] template function not resolved when comparing functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60531 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/86302] "f != 0" fails to choose the specialization f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86302 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98355] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in has_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:5628

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I had stated my intent in the initial submission to complete the C++ support in a followup patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2018-November/510455.html Jason approved the initial patch with an

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška

[Bug c++/97679] [10/11 Regression] [concepts] ICE with CTAD for a nested class template with constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97679 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Keywords|

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 --- Comment #13 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- IIUC, the issue comes from the following mismatch in cl_optimization_compare: if (ptr1->x_arm_fp16_format != ptr2->x_arm_fp16_format) internal_error ("% are modified in local

[Bug c++/94751] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid code in maybe_instantiate_noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94751 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/98636] [ARM] ICE on passing incompatible options for fp16 - global_options’ are modified in local context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636 --- Comment #12 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50003 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50003=edit options-save.c

[Bug libgomp/98738] task-detach-6.f90 hangs intermittently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738 --- Comment #6 from Kwok Yeung --- It seems to be the '#pragma omp taskwait' inside the parallel region that is causing the intermittent hang - if you add it to task-detach-5.c, the hang also happens there (i.e. the target construct is not the

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #3) > Oh, I see what you mean. > > FWIW this is the tip of a deceptively simple, but actually complex, iceberg. [for Darwin] These tests were working on the modules

[Bug libgomp/98699] Reset OMP_NESTED to true if OMP_MAX_ACTIVE_LEVELS is > 1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98699 --- Comment #3 from Bill Long --- Thanks, Tobias. GCC 11 should be fine. Great to see you back.

  1   2   >