https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50042|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98806
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98806
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bf7a17b2779c443d8f856fbbb028a9af9bdd9ad
commit r9-9198-g0bf7a17b2779c443d8f856fbbb028a9af9bdd9ad
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98806
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12c90e8741184604c2c66b6465bc85cd1765c53b
commit r10-9292-g12c90e8741184604c2c66b6465bc85cd1765c53b
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98806
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81f928ec8e8abf1f21c5ff008c39b5d6af78f6cb
commit r11-6881-g81f928ec8e8abf1f21c5ff008c39b5d6af78f6cb
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
--- Comment #20 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #18)
> Isn't this a bug in the assembly? We've changed the ABI, there is no way
> anyone can expect all old asm to work with power10 pcrel. To support pcrel
> you need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at sources dot
redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 50042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50042=edit
patch
This is a version of the patch that compiles. I moved the definitions of
vector_set_var after the p8 and p9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98806
Bug ID: 98806
Summary: libphobos: Resulting executables segfault on mipsel
architecture
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 50041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50041=edit
Tentative fix
Please give it a try when you get a chance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98805
Bug ID: 98805
Summary: exception abort on mac os 11 (big sur)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Hurchalla ---
My last comment went long:
I'd kindly request some way to inform gcc to generate a conditional move,
regardless of method.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
--- Comment #6 from Romain Naour ---
Hello,
Thanks for the help,
The previous gcc command line was from the busybox build (without -fPIC) but
this is not busybox that crash... this is the libc.
See how the libc (uClibc) was built:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
As with vector_extract, the P8 version requires TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE_64BIT.
I think that this needs something like the following:
--- rs6000.c2021-01-22 11:45:39.0 -0500
+++ cc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Hurchalla ---
Relying on improved codegen, I believe we have the current problem that there
are times that a programmer knows a conditional is unpredictable, yet it would
be impossible for a compiler to know. There's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98804
Bug ID: 98804
Summary: GCC misparses template in pack expansion as comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
--- Comment #18 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Oh no. Now I think it's GCC side.
According to gas doc
https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Symbol-Names.html#Symbol-Names
.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0 should be a local label. But in our LTO output, this label
be
submitted, but here is:
template concept Defined = true;
template struct entry {};
template
constexpr auto matches (entry , Atom auto b) { return d == b; };
compiling with 'g++ -std=c++20' from 11.0.0 20210123 produces:
bug-12.cpp:6:27: error: ‘Undefined’ has not been declared
6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
--- Comment #17 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Reported as https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27228
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
--- Comment #1 from Net Can ---
g++ -std=c++17 work on but not work on -std=c++2a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
--- Comment #4 from Romain Naour ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> > So -fPIE is not used here but there is a side effect when the patch is
> > applied.
>
> You need to look at the output of 'gcc -v' to be sure of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
Bug ID: 98802
Summary: class template argument deduce guide leads infinite
recursive.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c84d9e37d6a647bc2bbc83ac28250a4902a86ea
commit r9-9197-g5c84d9e37d6a647bc2bbc83ac28250a4902a86ea
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87472f174299fba9b17fdbcc016818587919bd12
commit r9-9196-g87472f174299fba9b17fdbcc016818587919bd12
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0184527ae9f81ef3865703b43212963b95ae174d
commit r10-9291-g0184527ae9f81ef3865703b43212963b95ae174d
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:259c63ce6d73f05bec3f84f36305ee71e435b62e
commit r10-9290-g259c63ce6d73f05bec3f84f36305ee71e435b62e
Author: Paul Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c63f091db89a56ae56b2bfa2ba4d9e956bd9693f
commit r11-6879-gc63f091db89a56ae56b2bfa2ba4d9e956bd9693f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
33 matches
Mail list logo
