[Bug libstdc++/99692] Lookup for operator<< skips global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Right the problem is here (and not with the compiler itself if there is a > problem): > /home/ubuntu/upstream-gcc/include/c++/11.0.1/ostream:747:46: error: no

[Bug libstdc++/99692] Lookup for operator<< skips global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/98736] [10/11 Regression] Wrong partition order generated in loop distribution pass since r10-619-g5879ab5fafedc8f6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98736 --- Comment #4 from bin cheng --- (In reply to bin cheng from comment #3) > hmm, seems topological order isn't enough for distributing a loop nest, we > need topological order plus inner loop depth-first. Well, not really. In this case,

[Bug c++/99692] New: Lookup for operator<< skips global scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692 Bug ID: 99692 Summary: Lookup for operator<< skips global scope Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug d/99691] New: OpenBSD support for GDC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99691 Bug ID: 99691 Summary: OpenBSD support for GDC Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee:

[Bug bootstrap/31235] Bootstrap comparison failure with -gstabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31235 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/71009] g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/99689] Initialized local variable becomes uninitialized after use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99689 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Keywords|

[Bug fortran/99688] AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address at gfc_match_name(char*) gcc/fortran/match.c:685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99688 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99690] New: gcc/config/m68k/t-mlibs doesn't allow extending MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99690 Bug ID: 99690 Summary: gcc/config/m68k/t-mlibs doesn't allow extending MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/97491] Wrong restriction for VALUE arguments of pure procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97491 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e016c286dae10ea1b037d149fee924bdd07e546a commit r9-9298-ge016c286dae10ea1b037d149fee924bdd07e546a Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug c++/99689] Initialized local variable becomes uninitialized after use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99689 --- Comment #1 from Soren Soe --- Created attachment 50440 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50440=edit source file

[Bug c++/99689] New: Initialized local variable becomes uninitialized after use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99689 Bug ID: 99689 Summary: Initialized local variable becomes uninitialized after use Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/99688] AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address at gfc_match_name(char*) gcc/fortran/match.c:685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99688 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99688] New: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address at gfc_match_name(char*) gcc/fortran/match.c:685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99688 Bug ID: 99688 Summary: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address at gfc_match_name(char*) gcc/fortran/match.c:685 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99687] AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x604000000d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99687 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/99687] AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x604000000d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99687 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99687] AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x604000000d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99687 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99687] New: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x604000000d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99687 Bug ID: 99687 Summary: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete) on 0x60400d50 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99675] [11 Regression] ICE during template deduction since r10-5020-g1a291106384cabc7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99675 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-20

[Bug c++/99686] ICE when concepts on C++17 when providing both T&& and const T& specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99686 --- Comment #1 from Steven Sun --- The compiler args are only "g++ -fconcepts -std=c++17" It should choose the full specialization func(int &&), while the compiler aborts during the instatiation of the partial specialization (using concepts).

[Bug c++/99686] New: ICE when concepts on C++17 when providing both T&& and const T& specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99686 Bug ID: 99686 Summary: ICE when concepts on C++17 when providing both T&& and const T& specialization Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/99685] New: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99685 Bug ID: 99685 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99684] New: [modules] std::visit fails to compile when is used as header unit

) 11.0.1 20210320 (experimental) [master branch], configured with '--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib', built as docker image on macOS 10.14.6 Dockerfile: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beanandbean/docker-gcc-cxx-modules/5fa616ae6c55bdb2c2961feff8d8ae5c51004961/Dockerfile [with argument

[Bug c++/99683] New: Deduction failure when using CTAD of CNTTP inside a deduction guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99683 Bug ID: 99683 Summary: Deduction failure when using CTAD of CNTTP inside a deduction guide Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99679] [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99679 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99679] [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99679 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19ff0b0d816e6e7d7657a8559e9957d79dc1d77f commit r11-7751-g19ff0b0d816e6e7d7657a8559e9957d79dc1d77f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Mar 20

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > I was worried that letters that introduce multi-letter constraints followed > by '\0' could be a problem too. Or do we rely on those being dropped > already

[Bug debug/99230] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/pr83527.c excess errors: '-fcompare-debug' failure (length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99230 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f59cb7cac009f3c6eba81eb09714699b9ac9f8d commit r11-7750-g9f59cb7cac009f3c6eba81eb09714699b9ac9f8d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I was worried that letters that introduce multi-letter constraints followed by '\0' could be a problem too. Or do we rely on those being dropped already earlier? Something like "=B" on x86_64 etc. In what

[Bug c++/99682] New: [modules] Module implementation unit is unable to indirectly import its corresponding interface unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99682 Bug ID: 99682 Summary: [modules] Module implementation unit is unable to indirectly import its corresponding interface unit Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug c++/97134] partial specialization not more specialized when using CNTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97134 Omer Rosler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||omer.rosler at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bf983c71e42d5a9f9df8a7dc436b30cd9da42f5 commit r11-7748-g8bf983c71e42d5a9f9df8a7dc436b30cd9da42f5 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Sorry for the troubles with my previous patch. I should have not be in hurry to fix PR99663. I'll fix it today. Jakub's patch could be a candidate but I prefer check constraint[0] on '\0'.

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/99673] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with address sanitizer due to member address substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673 --- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann --- Thank you for the detailed analysis. This was the last such warning I get with linux kernel randconfig build that I could not explain based on the earlier discussion, so now I can submit the local

[Bug target/99681] [11 Regression] ICE in print_shift_count_operand, at config/s390/s390.c:7630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99681 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99681] New: [11 Regression] ICE in print_shift_count_operand, at config/s390/s390.c:7630

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99681 Bug ID: 99681 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in print_shift_count_operand, at config/s390/s390.c:7630 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/99680] New: [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99680 Bug ID: 99680 Summary: [11 Regression] AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow since g:04b4828c6dd2 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/99508] [11 Regression] Asm labels declared inside a function are ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99508 --- Comment #6 from Frank Mehnert --- Fix confirmed. Thanks guys!

[Bug target/99679] [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99679 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-20 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99679] New: [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99679 Bug ID: 99679 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4 Product: gcc

[Bug debug/99334] Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- #c6 reproduces even on current trunk with -fno-tree-sink -O3 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -mstackrealign

[Bug c++/99546] Weird return value of C++20 requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99546 --- Comment #4 from 康桓瑋 --- same form, but this will trigger ICE: struct S{ constexpr static auto s = requires { []; }; }; :1:8: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in

[Bug target/99563] [10 Regression] Code miscompilation caused by _mm256_zeroupper()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99563 --- Comment #8 from andysem at mail dot ru --- Thanks again.

[Bug testsuite/99636] [10 Regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-80.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99636 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/99626] [10 Regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99626 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99563] [10 Regression] Code miscompilation caused by _mm256_zeroupper()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/99542] [9 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99542 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug ipa/99517] [10 Regression] __builtin_convertvector with casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99517 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99362] [10 Regression] invalid unused result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99362 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/99324] [8/9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable, at gimple-expr.c:918 since r6-314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug rtl-optimization/85099] [meta-bug] selective scheduling issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85099 Bug 85099 depends on bug 99085, which changed state. Bug 99085 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99085 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/99085] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99085 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95451] [8/9 regression] ICE for lambda capturing this and calling operator() since r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfbd0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 regression] ICE for |[8/9 regression] ICE for

[Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/99204] [8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug ipa/99034] [9 Regression] error: EH landing pad label is not first in a sequence of labels in bb 6during GIMPLE pass: einline since r9-6254-gf86624d85f937e03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99034 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] error: EH |[9 Regression] error: EH

[Bug sanitizer/99106] [9 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/99079] [8/9 Regression] Maybe a wrong code since r6-1462-g4ab1e111ef0669bb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] Maybe a |[8/9 Regression] Maybe a

[Bug c++/97742] [10 Regression] endless loop with code reduced by creduce/cvise

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97742 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99033] [9 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/99035] [9 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/99007] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/97487] [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939 since r8-3977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/97971] [9 Regression] ICE in process_alt_operands, at lra-constraints.c:3110

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE in|[9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug rtl-optimization/98287] [10 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:10000 with -O2 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98287 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99677] [[gnu::const]] attribute does not prevent dead global variable gets emitted.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99677 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > I think this is a dup of bug 99456. I do not think so because this has nothing to do with constexpr. better @jakub to see whether he has some solutions.