https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100109
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50632
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50632=edit
near fix
This seemed like a fix, but it breaks the modules/merge-8 testcase, and
debugging that is being slow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95983
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51971
--- Comment #5 from David Stone ---
After compiling this code
```
struct s {
s();
};
s::s() {}
s g() {
return s();
}
```
with `-O3 -Wsuggest-attribute=pure -Wsuggest-attribute=const`
I get the output
```
: In function 's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100149
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #7 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you for discussion. The proposed patch works fine for me (except for
missing ``;'' at the end of the line).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98584
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Running all D torture tests on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 with the RUNTESTFLAGS
--target_board=unix\{,-m64\}", I don't see any failures that arise in any f the
supported tests now.
---
=== gdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98584
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30b11d8d1be9c683f1517472c47a3cb69df02c4f
commit r11-8254-g30b11d8d1be9c683f1517472c47a3cb69df02c4f
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100149
Bug ID: 100149
Summary: Seg fault passing to CHARACTER(*), DIMENSION(*),
INTENT(IN), OPTIONAL
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 97536, which changed state.
Bug 97536 Summary: [concepts] parser segfault for concept defined in function
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29d8838c5ecaf70ce552fea7639ec1f34adb2e04
commit r11-8252-g29d8838c5ecaf70ce552fea7639ec1f34adb2e04
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98457
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98457
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fda5b17a89e5066e19371ea138253bbb9cad262a
commit r9-9364-gfda5b17a89e5066e19371ea138253bbb9cad262a
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98457
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19fc127321c7fe3962bd8b6c0064b224ab14aec7
commit r10-9718-g19fc127321c7fe3962bd8b6c0064b224ab14aec7
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:329d2f0df7d6d22c87ab3338b94caef68139cd58
commit r11-8251-g329d2f0df7d6d22c87ab3338b94caef68139cd58
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99797
--- Comment #11 from Martin Uecker ---
(In reply to Ivan Sorokin from comment #10)
...
> > is a bug if this choice is unreasonable and does not serve its users well.
>
> Do you have some specific proposal in mind?
>
> Currently a user has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100127
--- Comment #2 from Riccardo Brugo ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> I think that this issue is already fixed in the released 10.3 branch and in
> master (will shortly become GCC11). Please could you try one of those?
>
> $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We do not properly handle the VALUE attribute.
Reduced testcase:
program p
implicit none
class(*), allocatable :: d
call add_class (d)
contains
subroutine add_class (d)
class(*),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100148
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I bet it goes wrong during cprop1, at least fwprop1 dumps with --param
min-nondebug-insn-uid=1 look good to me and cprop1 contains
-rescanning insn with uid = 10033.
-GLOBAL CONST-PROP: Replacing reg 82
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98494
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98457
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc7d1c74ffb1cc85e67984632f581d526c783770
commit r11-8250-gdc7d1c74ffb1cc85e67984632f581d526c783770
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98494
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e19c6389966216af5925d2917a206cedc40540e8
commit r11-8249-ge19c6389966216af5925d2917a206cedc40540e8
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98058
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6eae7549b8a350b92435be904efed195bd190bae
commit r11-8248-g6eae7549b8a350b92435be904efed195bd190bae
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99794
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b66e72b43e1e8f402dc958ce3cca35f7c273340d
commit r11-8247-gb66e72b43e1e8f402dc958ce3cca35f7c273340d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99691
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d86e60855f05a0e493f8362c12bfd40d5432d337
commit r11-8246-gd86e60855f05a0e493f8362c12bfd40d5432d337
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100067
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bffc4b37e85c7f6092dfb0fbe4067d268e97b46
commit r11-8245-g3bffc4b37e85c7f6092dfb0fbe4067d268e97b46
Author: Richard Earnshaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
--- Comment #4 from Moritz Beutel ---
Interesting. I had figured that the test case could probably be reduced
further, but I didn't try because the bug appeared so brittle. Slightly
changing seemingly unrelated details made it vanish:
-
//
LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.1 20210419 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8)
> This fixes the hang:
This is a less intrusive solution, and is easier to transplant into
gomp_team_barrier_wait_cancel_end:
...
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98457
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Reduced test:
---
void main() { writef!"%s"; }
---
Any error that deals with a symbol that has a formatting string in it will
trigger a segmentation fault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
LGTM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc--netbsd |powerpc
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 50629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50629=edit
Proposed simpler patch
A simpler patch. I'll commit this later today (if no one stops me).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> e500 support had been moved to the powerpcspe target; so assuming power9 for
> -misel is correct.
>
> e500mc support is still there though.
There never
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92031
Chip Kerchner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90943
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Implemented downstream:
https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/484308ad163862632ae7e710c5d909be385450aa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #8)
> > OMG. Don't bother reducing. I can see the problem.
> >
> > EVRP is fine, but when wrestrict runs, its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94080
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Jonathan!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100075
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:714bdc31b69688ae2eaeb9807a48e0f101fecf4e
commit r11-8244-g714bdc31b69688ae2eaeb9807a48e0f101fecf4e
Author: Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99936
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f422b550ff6351d312e6c81a00b488d9280bfff
commit r11-8243-g2f422b550ff6351d312e6c81a00b488d9280bfff
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 50628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50628=edit
Fix for the PR
As I thought, the fix is trivial.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99805
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:056563557e5e6e00d467760744c5b8e8525a06ac
commit r9-9362-g056563557e5e6e00d467760744c5b8e8525a06ac
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I suppose this would be OK:
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_USELOCALE
# define __cpp_lib_to_chars 201611L
#endif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's std::from_chars which incorrectly allocates. It uses strtod which requires
a null-terminated string.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
This fixes the hang:
...
@@ -91,14 +129,16 @@ gomp_team_barrier_wait_end (gomp_barrier_t *bar,
gomp_barrier_state_t state)
{
gomp_barrier_handle_tasks (state);
state &=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84547
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Yes int128 (or rather double wide register) shifts are not optimized that
> well. They are not used by many people even. I wonder if there is a way to
> use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The uselocale thing could be handled by defining the macros only if
_GLIBCXX_HAVE_USELOCALE. Does any implementation actually handle it without
memory allocations? I mean, even sprintf can fail with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100144
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This looks just like a bogus assumption in the testcase.
The taskloop directive says that the iterations are split into some tasks. As
neither num_tasks nor graintsize clauses are specified, it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 50627
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50627=edit
debug patch
A bit more analysis.
I'm working with this example, with an actual task to be able to perform a
check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99797
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97880
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100110
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67572
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65762
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96279
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90542
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90745
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52389
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67791
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70472
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97944
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85828
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81380
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93770
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87308
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91371
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
