[Bug c++/100209] multiple inheritance with crtp pattern fails on sequentioal member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100209] multiple inheritance with crtp pattern fails on sequentioal member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- During cxx_eval_indirect_ref for *(const struct C &) (const struct C *) (struct C *) ((struct B *) this + -4); constant evaluation of the pointee yields + -4 where D.2217 is a temporary of type C

[Bug c++/100224] New: incorrect result when doing double vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100224 Bug ID: 100224 Summary: incorrect result when doing double vectorized Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/100223] New: Missing early return in std::partial_sort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100223 Bug ID: 100223 Summary: Missing early return in std::partial_sort Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/100209] multiple inheritance with crtp pattern fails on sequentioal member access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 --- Comment #9 from robert at ocallahan dot org --- That makes sense ... well, except implementing a full C++ parser and reserializer is horrific.

[Bug tree-optimization/100222] New: Redundant mark_irreducible_loops () in predicate.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100222 Bug ID: 100222 Summary: Redundant mark_irreducible_loops () in predicate.c Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 --- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to rob...@ocallahan.org from comment #7) > So gdb reads DW_AT_name "func", parses it, reserializes it to > "func", and uses that? Yeah. (Actually it's even worse than that, because at least one

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:20:54PM +, johnnorthall263 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 > > --- Comment #6 from John Northall --- > It's deliberate! I think

[Bug target/100093] different behavior between -mtune=cpu_type and target_attribute (“arch=cputype”)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100093 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100093] different behavior between -mtune=cpu_type and target_attribute (“arch=cputype”)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100093 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342de04d993beaa644d0b0087c20bef5dad5bf5f commit r12-78-g342de04d993beaa644d0b0087c20bef5dad5bf5f Author: liuhongt Date: Fri Apr

[Bug target/100152] [10.3, 11, 12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe --- reduced test case: ___UTF_8_put(char *a, int b) { char *c = a; int bytes; if (b <= 15) bytes = 2; else if (b <= 255) bytes = 4; else if (b <= 4095) bytes = 5; else bytes = 6; c

[Bug target/100152] [10.3, 11, 12 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 --- Comment #7 from robert at ocallahan dot org --- So gdb reads DW_AT_name "func", parses it, reserializes it to "func", and uses that?

[Bug fortran/69360] loop optimization produces invalid code when a common array has dimension 1 in some files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360 --- Comment #6 from John Northall --- It's deliberate! I think with this level of understanding of fortran use in the real world commercial compilers have a bright future! If it works with dimension set to 2 (whatever the background true

[Bug c++/77435] Dependent reference non-type template parameter not matched for partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/94508] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/94508] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e1aaf32ddf13cc79fcf146d6b62a6e0feb82be0 commit r12-73-g4e1aaf32ddf13cc79fcf146d6b62a6e0feb82be0 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/77435] Dependent reference non-type template parameter not matched for partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92664c058d705fcaf57875f93b4dfc36cf011afd commit r12-72-g92664c058d705fcaf57875f93b4dfc36cf011afd Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/86426] g++ ICE at on valid code in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3615

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn ---

[Bug c++/94210] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94210 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100161] [10/11 Regression] Impossible to suppress Wtype-limits warning involving template parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/100161] [10/11/12 Regression] Impossible to suppress Wtype-limits warning involving template parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec commit r12-71-g244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug fortran/100154] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100218] Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055976.html

[Bug tree-optimization/100221] New: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)

Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20210422 (experimental) [master revision 3cf04d1afa8:0e51007a40c:d42088e453042f4f8ba9190a7e29efd937ea2181] (GCC) [552] % [552] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c [553] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c [554] % [554] % wc O1.s O3.s 49 100

[Bug c++/93083] [C++20] copy deduction rejected when doing CTAD for NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mateusz.pusz at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/95015] Partial specializations of class templates with class NTTP fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95015 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/83818] g++ class template parameter deduction discards const qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ha, apparently I forgot that I'd reported the bug and fixed it myself.

[Bug c++/24666] [meta-bug] arrays decay to pointers too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24666 Bug 24666 depends on bug 94924, which changed state. Bug 94924 Summary: Default equality operator for C-array compares addresses, not data https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/93480] Defaulted <=> doesn't expand array elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rhalbersma at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/94924] Default equality operator for C-array compares addresses, not data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/100220] New: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3 (vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)

--with-system-zlib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20210422 (experimental) [master revision 3cf04d1afa8:0e51007a40c:d42088e453042f4f8ba9190a7e29efd937ea2181] (GCC) [639] % [639] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c [640] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c [641

[Bug c++/80990] cv-qualifiers ignored in variable definition using class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla.gcc.karo at cupdev dot ne

[Bug c++/83818] g++ class template parameter deduction discards const qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100215] Improve text of -Wmaybe-uninitialized references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100215 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100219] New: Arm/Cortex-M: Suboptimal code returning unaligned struct with non-empty stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100219 Bug ID: 100219 Summary: Arm/Cortex-M: Suboptimal code returning unaligned struct with non-empty stack frame Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/100187] Helper lambda in ranges_algo.h misses forwarding return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/100218] New: Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218 Bug ID: 100218 Summary: Allow target of the pointer resulting from the evaluation of function-reference in a variable definition context Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug inline-asm/98847] Miscompilation with c++17, templates, and register keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847 --- Comment #12 from programmerjake at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > Fixed. Thanks!!

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > > I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking > > for > > rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Bet the new s390_md_asm_adjust code is unprepared to see hard registers there.

[Bug target/100217] [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100217] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217 Bug ID: 100217 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/82376] Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055973.html

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking > for > rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in sync.md No, the other are not problematic.

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking for rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in sync.md

[Bug target/100216] arm: UB in arm_canonicalize_comparison (shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100216 --- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan --- GCC built with UBSan here, to be clear.

[Bug target/100216] New: arm: UB in arm_canonicalize_comparison (shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100216 Bug ID: 100216 Summary: arm: UB in arm_canonicalize_comparison (shift exponent 127 is too large for 64-bit type) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|uros at gcc

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/100215] New: Improve text of -Wmaybe-uninitialized references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100215 Bug ID: 100215 Summary: Improve text of -Wmaybe-uninitialized references Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/13495] Friendship to class nested within a template is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13495 Bug 13495 depends on bug 16617, which changed state. Bug 16617 Summary: Fail to do access checking correctly for non-dependent qualified-id https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617 What|Removed

[Bug c++/16617] Fail to do access checking correctly for non-dependent qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/84689] is_invocable is true even for call operator via ambiguous base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2 commit r12-70-g3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/16617] Fail to do access checking correctly for non-dependent qualified-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:330cc29c06306ebf7bd3b2d37704cc69944923ff commit r12-69-g330cc29c06306ebf7bd3b2d37704cc69944923ff Author: Patrick Palka Date: Thu

[Bug c++/100055] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE on invalid requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100055 康桓瑋 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hewillk at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋

[Bug target/100214] New: UB in arm.c:optimal_immediate_sequence_1 (left shift of 255 by 30 places cannot be represented in type 'int')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100214 Bug ID: 100214 Summary: UB in arm.c:optimal_immediate_sequence_1 (left shift of 255 by 30 places cannot be represented in type 'int') Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug c++/100210] [[nodiscard]] constructor causes warning on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/100210] [[nodiscard]] constructor causes warning on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug jit/100096] libgccjit.so.0: Cannot write-enable text segment: Permission denied on NetBSD 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100096 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/99106] [9 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99106 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99035] [9 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/98601] [8/9 Regression] aarch64: ICE in rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1, at rtlanal.c:467

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/99136] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14854

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99136 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/99007] [8/9 Regression] ICE in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98556] [8/9 Regression] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed since r8-4821-g1af4ebf5985ef2aa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99033] [9 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98681] [8/9 Regression] aarch64: Invalid ubfiz instruction rejected by assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/99034] [9 Regression] error: EH landing pad label is not first in a sequence of labels in bb 6during GIMPLE pass: einline since r9-6254-gf86624d85f937e03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99034 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/99388] Invalid debug info for __fp16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/99905] [8/9 Regression] wrong code with -mno-mmx -mno-sse since r7-4540-gb229ab2a712ccd44

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99905 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99790] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_2 since r7-3811

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99790 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Bug 89180 depends on bug 99588, which changed state. Bug 99588 Summary: variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/99324] [8/9 Regression] ICE in mark_addressable, at gimple-expr.c:918 since r6-314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/99588] variable set but not used warning on static _Atomic assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99204] [8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:15441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99204 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/99181] char_traits (and thus string_view) compares strings differently in constexpr and non-constexpr contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99181 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/99849] [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:11556 since r5-5407-g30d5d8c5189064c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99849 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/99990] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gimplifier on invalid va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/99079] [8/9 Regression] Maybe a wrong code since r6-1462-g4ab1e111ef0669bb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99079 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99833] [8/9 Regression] structured binding + if init + generic lambda = internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99833 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99650] ICE when trying to form reference to void in structured binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/100114] libasan built against latest glibc doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99613] Static variable destruction order race condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99613 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/99334] Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug inline-asm/98847] Miscompilation with c++17, templates, and register keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98353] [8/9 Regression] ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1053 since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98353 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/98331] [8/9 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7845 since r8-5479-g67a8d7199fe4e474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/98205] ICE in expand_omp_for_generic, at omp-expand.c:4307

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98205 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/98183] [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_gimple_stmt_1, at cfgexpand.c:3972

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98183 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98100] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5610

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98063] Emit R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 instead of R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX for -mcmodel=large -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97958] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4868

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97958 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/97599] [8/9 Regression] missing unspecified_parameters DIE in DWARF for functions with variable arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97599 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   >