[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez --- Note, this is still broken so I am leaving the PR open. I will address this next week.

[Bug libstdc++/100823] New: Special member functions of common_iterator should be conditionally trivial

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100823 Bug ID: 100823 Summary: Special member functions of common_iterator should be conditionally trivial Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2364b584552208ce715fa4fd44c510b7e5210d1e commit r12-1118-g2364b584552208ce715fa4fd44c510b7e5210d1e Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 --- Comment #6 from Firas Khalil Khana --- Thanks for your time.

[Bug c++/100822] New: new expression for an array of function pointers gets parsed as lambda incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100822 Bug ID: 100822 Summary: new expression for an array of function pointers gets parsed as lambda incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- This temporary fix resolves the bootstrap comparison on i686. Does it also fix it on sparc-32? diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c index 118d10365a0..b40649b6a10 100644 ---

[Bug target/94177] TLS global-dynamic model clobbers function parameter on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94177 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by David Edelsohn : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0be51abf080f1d7515e3777dd5e5a983b47573a8 commit r11-8481-g0be51abf080f1d7515e3777dd5e5a983b47573a8 Author: David Edelsohn

[Bug tree-optimization/100817] ICE with -O2: in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100817 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- /* Theoretically possible, but *highly* unlikely. */ gcc_checking_assert (num_iterations < 500);

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, compile-time-hog

[Bug fortran/100821] New: Deferred character with wrong bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Bug ID: 100821 Summary: Deferred character with wrong bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug bootstrap/100820] New: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Bug ID: 100820 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100819] New: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Bug ID: 100819 Summary: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- I found the issue. I will send a fix soon, once testing on powerpc64, x86_64 finishes.

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:799cf16051844f80d09526f17194373902254708 commit r10-9871-g799cf16051844f80d09526f17194373902254708 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100656] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e9e0798d2242b7908db4098136d0bfd0bc7f0e8 commit r11-8480-g1e9e0798d2242b7908db4098136d0bfd0bc7f0e8 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100656] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cb4a0db82c51c742961a350c9c7a45ba1fe8475 commit r11-8479-g1cb4a0db82c51c742961a350c9c7a45ba1fe8475 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug libstdc++/100806] deadlock in std::counting_semaphore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100806 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-28

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb5c89afbe0ef59fa315cbfda31a55ea5d8ca297 commit r11-8478-gcb5c89afbe0ef59fa315cbfda31a55ea5d8ca297 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps if EVRP is folding debug stmts it could first fold non-debug stmts (and remember if there were any debug stmts) and only fold debug stmts afterwards, either just by using caches and not adding

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps if EVRP is folding debug stmts it could first fold non-debug stmts (and remember if there were any debug stmts) and only fold debug stmts afterwards, either just by using caches and not adding

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore anterior patch as it contains really bad errors a corrected one will follow shortly.

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686|i686, sparc CC|

[Bug fortran/100818] New: A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Bug ID: 100818 Summary: A temporary is passed to associated Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-05-26 3:32 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > Attached a possible fix. While the patch fixes boot, pr100619.c fails: spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/xgcc

[Bug c/100817] New: ICE with -O2: in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2513

20210528 (experimental) [master revision :0e2d976f7:cd62d089f6021fd1ad4537b8182836d15b14514f] (GCC) $ cat mutant.c a; __attribute__((cold)) b () { for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;

[Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Grund --- Confirmed to also break with GCC 7.3, 8.2, 8.3 but works with 6.3, 6.4, 6.5

[Bug c++/100805] __int128 should be disabled for non-extended -std= options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100805 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #2) > __int128 behaves mostly like an integer type but is not an "extended integer > type" as defined in the standard. Quoting from >

[Bug fortran/100816] New: Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Bug ID: 100816 Summary: Wrong span on widechar Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100815] [10.3, 11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815 --- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson --- Actually it looks like the regression was introduced in 10.3. It works in 10.2 and earlier.

[Bug target/79173] add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/100815] New: [11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815 Bug ID: 100815 Summary: [11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- adding -fno-ipa-icf or -fno-ipa-sra, or both flags makes a difference

[Bug ipa/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Component|lto

[Bug c++/100502] [11/12 Regression] ICE in enforce_access at cp/semantics.c:368 since r11-6800-g29853c653245c37e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100502 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100502] [11/12 Regression] ICE in enforce_access at cp/semantics.c:368 since r11-6800-g29853c653245c37e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100502 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:365deb8399262033ac766b924c35d31db3d621ca commit r11-8475-g365deb8399262033ac766b924c35d31db3d621ca Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug libstdc++/100479] range adaptors handle cached iterators incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100479 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49f369fb33fb5bed4dadfb5b42b23cded888ab52 commit r11-8476-g49f369fb33fb5bed4dadfb5b42b23cded888ab52 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec-Built-in-Functions-Available-on-ISA-3_002e1.html vector unsigned long long int vec_gnb (vector unsigned __int128, const unsigned char) should be unsigned

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also on say PowerPC, not omitting the frame pointer gives no benifit whats so ever really with respect to backtracing.

[Bug fortran/100814] New: Fortran memory error on assignment from polymorphic variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100814 Bug ID: 100814 Summary: Fortran memory error on assignment from polymorphic variable Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100813] New: Function of array of pointers to abstract class returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813 Bug ID: 100813 Summary: Function of array of pointers to abstract class returning an array Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu |

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The fix pushed is for a related issue only, still working on the actual issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7a07f5a5d8065e7f11133dd1f4ad3510ab2195b commit r12-1115-gf7a07f5a5d8065e7f11133dd1f4ad3510ab2195b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug lto/100812] New: [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Bug ID: 100812 Summary: [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c commit r12-1114-gf838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c commit r12-1114-gf838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100801] Aggressive loop optimizations cause incorrect warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801 --- Comment #2 from Joel Linn --- Great. In the meantime I will use > if (count % 4 == 0) __builtin_unreachable(); at the start of the for loop to suppress the warning as suggested by Martin Sebor

[Bug ipa/100791] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: verify_gimple failed |[10/11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:359c0a86e2974a9f3036bc05b6e6c661f2c463cf commit r12-1113-g359c0a86e2974a9f3036bc05b6e6c661f2c463cf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b2b32ab2d8cff4eb0dad0ef4e72e33257574cb6 commit r12-1112-g8b2b32ab2d8cff4eb0dad0ef4e72e33257574cb6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška --- > So, for either a one time call of __gcov_dump (though we may attempt to call > __gcov_dump many times) or at the exit of the program execution, the merge > of profile happens due to which __gcov_reset

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2a913c76f41692fd0bb955d1768f462133d813a commit r12--gd2a913c76f41692fd0bb955d1768f462133d813a Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug target/100811] New: Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Bug ID: 100811 Summary: Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > > > --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- > >

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/100788] Internal compiler error related to #line macros(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/100801] Aggressive loop optimizations cause incorrect warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |tree-optimization Keywords|

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Summary|[9/10/11/12

[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Version|unknown

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa Version|tree-ssa

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/100784] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char const*, int, char const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: Segmentation fault,|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/100782] [11 Regression] sh4 ICEs on -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100782 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|12.0| Summary|[11 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/100774] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=ranger-trace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100774 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2) > I have a fix for this... > Do we add -fcompare-debug tests into the testsuite? I don't see any other > tests with it. Sure we do, grep will show quite

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #21 from Gejoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20) > > I'm trying to understand line #22 to #26 specifically of .c.gcov file(as > > shown in commment #16. Let me know if the steps followed in compilation or > > execution

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c94424b0ed786ec92b6904da69af8b5243b34fdc commit r12-1109-gc94424b0ed786ec92b6904da69af8b5243b34fdc Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100810] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22e530ec7baf59f6ed028bf05776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[12 Regression] wrong code

[Bug c++/100797] [9/10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 commit r9-9558-gebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 commit r9-9558-gebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug tree-optimization/100810] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

gcc version 12.0.0 20210528 (experimental) [master revision 4774807e6e5:0e2d976f72b:cd62d089f6021fd1ad4537b8182836d15b14514f] (GCC) [512] % [512] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out [513] % [513] % gcctk -O1 small.c [514] % ./a.out Aborted [515] % [515] % cat small.c int a, b = 1, c = 1, e, f = 1, g, h

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- Thanks for the bug report. This is reproducible. Will look into it.

[Bug target/100771] Types differ between i386-elf and x86_64-elf -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100771 Paul Menzel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmenzel+gcc at molgen dot mpg.de ---

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- Same applies to modulo.

[Bug c++/100809] New: PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 Bug ID: 100809 Summary: PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- > I'm trying to understand line #22 to #26 specifically of .c.gcov file(as > shown in commment #16. Let me know if the steps followed in compilation or > execution had any thing wrong. What is wrong with

[Bug c++/100807] initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100807 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 100807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkropki at yahoo dot co.uk --- Comment

[Bug c++/80272] g++ runs out of memory with aggregate init of large std::array of non-trivial class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) Thanks for the comments! > There's predictive commoning which can do similar transforms and runs after > vectorization. It might be it doesn't handle these

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at gyoo dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/77443] Empty initializer on huge object array member slow down the compilation dramatically with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77443 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c/100808] New: PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bug ID: 100808 Summary: PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/100807] New: initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100807 Bug ID: 100807 Summary: initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- There's predictive commoning which can do similar transforms and runs after vectorization. It might be it doesn't handle these "simple" cases or that loop dependence info is not up to the task there.

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #19 from Gejoe --- Just to add on : The a.out was run twice and hence the value of 20 against line # 19, 29 of .c.gcov file(as shown in commment #16). Let me know if anything is not clear.

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #18 from Gejoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > (In reply to Gejoe from comment #13) > > I modified my sample-prog.c file just by adding a line of __gcov_reset > > before the while loop. > > > > Can you please

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #17 from Gejoe --- Created attachment 50882 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50882=edit sample-prog.i file Preprocessed file contents.

[Bug tree-optimization/99398] Miss to optimize vector permutation fed by CTOR and CTOR/CST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99398 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >