https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101402
Bug ID: 101402
Summary: top cv qualifier not dropped for array type typedef in
template class (core 1001)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101374
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1798cac7a8b3331a277da1f106752ce0a34f8937
commit r12-2234-g1798cac7a8b3331a277da1f106752ce0a34f8937
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82110
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9119edc09e4660d772dea771578715858f7fbdb
commit r12-2233-gb9119edc09e4660d772dea771578715858f7fbdb
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101371
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
And this should compile fine but doesn't since r269078:
struct A {
int i;
};
struct B {
A a{};
constexpr B() : a() {}
constexpr B(const B ) : a(rhs.a) {}
};
struct C {
B arr[1];
};
constexpr C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82110
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:44:11PM +, urbanjost at comcast dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
>
> --- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
> Wow. I cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
--- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Wow. I cannot get a pizza delivered that fast. Thanks! I have -Wtabs set in my
compiler script and the script I use for editing codes does a :retabs after
turning off tabs in vim(1) and runs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-09
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
This could potentially arrive with the arm64 darwin port:
https://github.com/iains/gcc-darwin-arm64/issues/1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101336
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101336
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:506f337ad2d75c0feceaaf28fd4997c157979956
commit r12-2231-g506f337ad2d75c0feceaaf28fd4997c157979956
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jul 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101401
Bug ID: 101401
Summary: strlen of a constant char vector not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
The patch in comment #6 lets the build complete, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
--- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
I agree tabs are not part of the standard, but even by default it is a very
common extension ( I tried it with gfortran, ifort, nvfortran just today). I
not not use the extension normally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
--- Comment #6 from Toolybird ---
The patch you posted to gcc-patches solves my problem.
Thank you for the quick fix!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101400
Bug ID: 101400
Summary: comments mention gnu-attributes[opt] even though it
can be empty
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98449
VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vini.ipsmaker at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
tab is not part of Fortran character set.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101399
Bug ID: 101399
Summary: Horizonal tab character not ignored on print statement
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 101098, which changed state.
Bug 101098 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE with explicit specialization of
constrained function template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b273a8566e7806e9498c78b16c30c9d81d6e81b
commit r11-8716-g8b273a8566e7806e9498c78b16c30c9d81d6e81b
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5830fffacd05463c20b592bb6ed20e333d7d272b
commit r11-8715-g5830fffacd05463c20b592bb6ed20e333d7d272b
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86355
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:542d90bfd802274f38637aaaffc2dd1de62c9ec6
commit r11-8714-g542d90bfd802274f38637aaaffc2dd1de62c9ec6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddd25bd1a7c8f456bc914e34b77d43f39a1062d4
commit r12-2230-gddd25bd1a7c8f456bc914e34b77d43f39a1062d4
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
Or maybe I misunderstood your request and you wanted an Ada testcase where the
hoisting would still happen despite the fix for C++?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101398
Bug ID: 101398
Summary: Multiple DW_TAG_formal_parameter DIEs for the same
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86439
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toe-ger at web dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88026
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51124|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101397
Bug ID: 101397
Summary: spurious warning writing to the result of stpcpy minus
1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5b1bb0d197f9141a0f0e510f8d1b598c3df9552
commit r12-2229-gd5b1bb0d197f9141a0f0e510f8d1b598c3df9552
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101396
Bug ID: 101396
Summary: ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 building
webkitgtk-2.32.2 with -flto -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Something like the patch in comment 3 to handle the overflow in
tree-ssa-strlen.c is still needed. Otherwise GCC does issue a -Warray-bounds
but that's enabled only with -Wall (the test expects buffer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95681
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 97027, which changed state.
Bug 97027 Summary: missing warning on buffer overflow storing a larger scalar
into a smaller array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97027
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Note that the testcase also raises Storage_Error with:
function Foo (J : Integer) return Integer;
pragma Pure_Function (Foo);
pragma Machine_Attribute (Foo, "noipa");
and in Ada calls to pure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] GCC 11 |[12 Regression] GCC 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #2 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 51124 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please test this patch.
It doesn't work.
I use ./sde-external-8.63.0-2021-01-18-lin/sde -spr -- gcc test.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I have no easy way to test the patch so it might need a little tweaking. It
looks like the __kernel_helper_version macro is used as an lvalue so the macro
needs to expand to a call to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #55 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23
commit r12-2226-g41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I've not yet managed to verify that the gnat.dg/opt95.adb testcase works
> as expected but will do so when the Ada FE is officially fixed.
Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 51124
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51124=edit
A patch
Please test this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101269
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37e65643d3e32d33bb6c9d15c678a627d1682626
commit r12-2223-g37e65643d3e32d33bb6c9d15c678a627d1682626
Author: Indu Bhagat
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I see in the gnat_ugn manual that there is still the -Werror option that
> causes GCC back end to treat warnings as errors. Is that means -gnatwe is
> for front end, and -Werror for back end?
Yes, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101325
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Lyon ---
As I am going on holidays until August (back only 2 days until then), I thought
I should share my WIP here. No sure that's the right direction, anyway that's
not working yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
Bug ID: 101395
Summary: Compile failure with -march=native -m32 on
sapphirerapids
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101386
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this bug.
The:
__attribute__((malloc, malloc(string_delete)))
is confusing the analyzer; if I remove it, the code compiles without warnings.
I'm not yet sure what the analyzer should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #3 from Pedro Alves ---
BTW, I found it curious that empty2 and empty3 get their own addresses, even at
run time, when they could have all been squashed to the same address. I.e.,
e.g., this ends up with sizeof == 3, when it could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
Pedro Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alves.ped at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101181
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c699fd29829cd6115f78238dab7cab74f0a5009
commit r12--g2c699fd29829cd6115f78238dab7cab74f0a5009
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101247
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f53e66019df819f55d424cc56f8b0ea81c074b55
commit r12-2221-gf53e66019df819f55d424cc56f8b0ea81c074b55
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6745246120d18db857344894967f2dc9c586fd0a
commit r11-8712-g6745246120d18db857344894967f2dc9c586fd0a
Author: Martin Jambor
-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210709 (experimental) [master revision
:aa0aefd8a:fdc4d2a516d042bc9a6936fad3f887aff353a296] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
a, b, c, d;
e() __attribute__((returns_twice));
f() {
int *g = c;
if (b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
Bug ID: 101393
Summary: PowerPC32 inline assembly broken by commit
2d94f7dea9c73ef3c116a0ddc722724578a860fe
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon ---
The patch does not work, I'm now getting this error:
In file included from
/home/christophe.lyon/src/GCC/sources/gcc-fsf-git/trunk/libatomic/config/arm/host-config.h:4,
from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101392
Bug ID: 101392
Summary: cc1gm2 -fdump-system-exports SEGV on Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391
Bug ID: 101391
Summary: Unresolved reference to module getopt
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101390
Bug ID: 101390
Summary: Expand vector mod as vector div + multiply-subtract
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101389
Bug ID: 101389
Summary: Parallel build doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101388
Bug ID: 101388
Summary: Unconditional use of __MAX_BAUD
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101387
Bug ID: 101387
Summary: Unconditional use of
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
--- Comment #2 from Iru Cai ---
Thanks, -gnatwe works for both gcc and gnatmake.
I see in the gnat_ugn manual that there is still the -Werror option that causes
GCC back end to treat warnings as errors. Is that means -gnatwe is for front
end,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51122
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51122=edit
patch
This is the patch fixing the issue for the C++ testcase (when a fix for
PR100409 is applied), it also fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The issue I can see is that the middle-end does not consider
> the Foo function 'const' (gimple_call_flags does not return ECF_CONST)
> which is likely because the decl isn't TREE_READONLY and for 'const'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100772
--- Comment #1 from David Ledger ---
Bump, is there anything else I need to provide to assist in this matter?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101386
Bug ID: 101386
Summary: Analysis of attribute malloc's deallocator function is
not capable of abstraction
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101385
Bug ID: 101385
Summary: -Werror doesn't have effect on Ada frontend
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101377
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101377
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9d954ebd507572a460f93f404bba71e271e2dda
commit r11-8711-gd9d954ebd507572a460f93f404bba71e271e2dda
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101377
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e37e175e7dc3376244eb7705269ada6755616831
commit r12-2189-ge37e175e7dc3376244eb7705269ada6755616831
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
>
> --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > Eric, is it possible to write an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, is it possible to write an equivalent testcase in Ada?
procedure P is
function Foo (J : Integer) return Integer;
pragma Machine_Attribute (Foo, "const");
pragma Machine_Attribute (Foo,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |debug
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
How did you configure / make and on what host / target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
Bug ID: 101384
Summary: wrong code at -Og and above with vector shift/multiply
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101383
Bug ID: 101383
Summary: GCC 11 Reproducibility Issue
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101024
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> You will notice this is not caught by phiopt1 even though it should be while
> it is caught now (on the trunk) by phiopt2 (match-and-simplify). That is
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101382
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101380
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.0 |12.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100762
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
commit r12-2183-g82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Fri Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100760
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
commit r12-2183-g82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Fri Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100761
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
commit r12-2183-g82625a42e652d52fc6bbe6070f8d0589d5e0c8ad
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Fri Jun
98 matches
Mail list logo
