[Bug c++/101603] [meta-bug] pointer to member functions issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603 Bug 101603 depends on bug 90780, which changed state. Bug 90780 Summary: references to pmf types mess up https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90780 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/70097] Cannot assign ref-qualified non-static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/90780] references to pmf types mess up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90780 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90780] references to pmf types mess up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90780 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC loses ref-qualifiers|references to pmf types

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 78802, which changed state. Bug 78802 Summary: ICE with auto placeholder concept in synthesize_implicit_template_parm https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78802 What|Removed

[Bug c++/82768] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:39338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pkeir at outlook dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/78802] ICE with auto placeholder concept in synthesize_implicit_template_parm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78802 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89642] gcc rejects valid implicit typename context in cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89642 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC, ICC, clang and MSVC all reject this at -std=c++20 (or /std:c++latest for MSVC).

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- The original testcase and the one in comment #2 started to work in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/87327] [8 Regression] Calling member functions on captured constexpr variables "is not a constant expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87327 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rcc.dark at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/89643] [8 Regression] constexpr capture not working inside expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 82768, which changed state. Bug 82768 Summary: ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:39338 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/71543] [concepts] ICE on ill-formed declaration of a parameter with a constrained-type-specifier in a requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gomboc at cs dot ucr.edu --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/82768] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:39338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82768 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 78511, which changed state. Bug 78511 Summary: ICE on using concept name as a "requires" parameter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78511 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/71543] [concepts] ICE on ill-formed declaration of a parameter with a constrained-type-specifier in a requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugzilla at minijackson dot 33

[Bug c++/78511] ICE on using concept name as a "requires" parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78511 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/89085] call of overload is ambiguous with parameter packs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89085 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0, 10.3.0, 11.1.0,

[Bug c++/88694] constexpr isn't captured correctly in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/88736] nullptr_t available without namespace qualification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88736 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid | See Also|

[Bug c++/86669] [7 regression] Complete object constructor clone omits length for a c++11 braced initialiser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86669 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jengelh at inai dot de --- Comment #13

[Bug c++/88517] Virtual-base class class constructor with for-loop with initializer list referencing local variable not executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88517 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94619] String literals as non-type template parameter fails to compile with partial specialization of calling function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94619 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0, 11.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC accepts both with GCC 10+.

[Bug c++/82204] G++ doesn't connect friend and extern declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/85612] ADL lookup with parameter pack and defaulted argument not considered ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85612 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC, ICC, clang and MSVC all reject this code the same way.

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 81700, which changed state. Bug 81700 Summary: Unresolved function type when taking address of operator() of generic lambda https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81700 What|Removed

[Bug c++/81700] Unresolved function type when taking address of operator() of generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81700 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/43064] improve location and text of diagnostics in constructor initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c++/85514] g++ accepts invalid template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85514 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- clang started to accept this code in clang 5.0.0. ICC started to accept it between 13 and 16. MSVC started to accept it in v19.23 (19.23.28105.4). So I think this one can be closed as invalid.

[Bug c++/101786] P1143R2 constinit implementation is incomplete (joining with thread_local)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101786] P1143R2 constinit implementation is incomplete (joining with thread_local)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101786 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/66839] g++ accepts NSDMI with -std=c++98 when the intializer is a macro defined in a standard header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66839 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/101786] New: P1143R2 constinit implementation is incomplete (joining with thread_local)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101786 Bug ID: 101786 Summary: P1143R2 constinit implementation is incomplete (joining with thread_local) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/61543] static_cast(static_cast(enum_value)) doesn't get an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/80651] Non-type template argument deduction fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80651 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Seems fixed in GCC 11.

[Bug c++/88092] class nontype template deduction failed when providing type to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/57466] [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17) > Fine by me. > > EDG agrees with GCC, but Clang accepts the original example. I guess they'll > change when 1584 gets resolved. clang started to reject in

[Bug c++/81051] virtual base access during construction crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81051 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The vtable is not set until after the call of the constructor of B::B which is after the call to f(this). When is the vtable supposed to be put in the this object?

[Bug c++/79416] Internal compiler error for recursive template expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79416 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug c++/79735] C++14: syntax error in attribute deprecated silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79735 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/18296] Misleading diagnostic for recursive template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18296 Bug 18296 depends on bug 15538, which changed state. Bug 15538 Summary: Misleading diagnostic for recursive template instantiation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15538 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15538] Misleading diagnostic for recursive template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/15538] Misleading diagnostic for recursive template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 86607, which changed state. Bug 86607 Summary: constexpr function does not treat function pointers with external linkage as constexpr https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86607 What|Removed

[Bug c++/77911] Comparing function pointers in a constexpr function can produce an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77911 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tadeus.prastowo at unitn dot it ---

[Bug c++/86607] constexpr function does not treat function pointers with external linkage as constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77911] Comparing function pointers in a constexpr function can produce an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77911 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-05 Depends on|

[Bug c++/77815] access to destructor via decltype-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77815 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xmh970252187 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/99262] The decltype-specifier that denotes a destructor in a function call is rejected by GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101603] [meta-bug] pointer to member functions issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603 Bug 101603 depends on bug 74744, which changed state. Bug 74744 Summary: Fails to select overridden function when determined by template parameter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74744 What|Removed

[Bug c++/74744] Fails to select overridden function when determined by template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74744 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/88538] parse error with class nontype template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c++/70585] Bogus 'ambiguous template instantiation' error with partial specializations involving a pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70585 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/70983] False ambiguity on member function rvalue overload using auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70983 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70737] Invalid C++ code compiles when using explicit template conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70737 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/71267] [C++14] recursive metafunction won't compile: no type named 'type'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71267 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/71502] Fold expression unpacks (I < ...) the wrong way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71502 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84464] Pack expansion in mem-initializer-list with expression-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84464 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/69957] Ambiguous overload due to incorrect partial ordering of V<> and V

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69957 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-05 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/101744] [12 regression] hwasan new failures since r12-2424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > > ``` > > Just want to clarify that it's our developping lam version which is at > > https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/intel/lam/master > > What can

[Bug c++/97819] Pack expansion in member initializer lists nested with their parameter list got rejected.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97819 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/65422] [C++11] Rejected valid double expansion packs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65422 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.1.0, 11.2.0,

[Bug c++/69372] GCC allows array and function types to be caught by reference.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80176] [5/6 Regression] cannot bind reference to static member function using object access expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 68386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/68386] error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'void (&&)()' from expression of type 'void()'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Known to work|

[Bug c++/69302] parentheses cause address of register variable to be requested (c++1y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69302 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/101785] aarch64-linux-android is not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 99964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libgcc/99964] android(bionic) cannot find crti.o and crtn.o on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/68077] Namespace having the same name as contained class should not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68077 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > > Dup of bug 101785 really. There is no supported at all included. >

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > Dup of bug 101785 really. There is no supported at all included. > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Dup of bug 101785 really. There is no supported at all included. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101785 *** but i am sure __NR_newfstatat

[Bug target/101785] aarch64-linux-android is not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 101784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This is a bug in android headers. > > I really doubt anyone really cares enough about gcc support for android > these days. I also really double anyone has really

[Bug target/101785] Android macro is not defined for aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is a bug in android headers. I really doubt anyone really cares enough about gcc support for android these days. I also really double anyone has really ported aarch64 android support to gcc. Google

[Bug c++/101785] New: Android macro is not defined for aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101785 Bug ID: 101785 Summary: Android macro is not defined for aarch64-linux-android Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51264 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51264=edit more errors

[Bug sanitizer/101784] __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51263 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51263=edit log file

[Bug sanitizer/101784] New: __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101784 Bug ID: 101784 Summary: __NR_newfstatat is not defined on aarch64-linux-android Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101782] [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think we can probably do this to stop the test failing: --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ // { dg-do compile {

[Bug tree-optimization/94356] Missed optimisation: useless multiplication generated for pointer comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94356 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Hmm, the following is worse: That looks like a separate issue. We have fold_comparison for GENERIC, and match.pd has related patterns for integers, or for

[Bug c++/101782] [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/53660] function pointer conversion function template with nested-name-specifier ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53660 --- Comment #2 from David Krauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't think this is a bug. Right, the behavior looks correct. As for a nested-name-specifier working in this context, it works if it's not dependent. As for

[Bug analyzer/101570] [12 Regression] ICE in maybe_reconstruct_from_def_stmt, at analyzer/analyzer.cc:133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101570 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/101570] [12 Regression] ICE in maybe_reconstruct_from_def_stmt, at analyzer/analyzer.cc:133

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101570 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ded2c2c068f6f2825474758cb03a05070a5837e8 commit r12-2749-gded2c2c068f6f2825474758cb03a05070a5837e8 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug c++/67048] [9/10/11/12 Regression] GCC rejects well-formed program using empty anonymous enum specifier in a variable declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67048 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/101611] AVX2 vector arithmetic shift lowered to scalar unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101611 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/67777] unsigned wchar_t and signed wchar_t should cause compiler errors but do not.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||46589 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/31584] [DR502] nested enum not considered dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31584 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC, ICC, clang and MSVC all accept the testcase in comment #11.

[Bug c++/60705] ill-formed member access in alias template ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60705 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-03-29 00:00:00 |2021-8-4 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/66698] Multiple inheritance from instantiations of template class and what about access to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66698 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/66698] Multiple inheritance from instantiations of template class and what about access to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66698 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.1.0, 6.4.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/66484] Exception specification can declare a pointer to incomplete type, which is against C++ standard section 15.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66484 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug testsuite/101782] [12 regression] Excess errors in g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C after r12-2729

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101782 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-04

[Bug fortran/101350] ICE in build_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2376

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101350 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > index 45c3ad387ac..897cfde3ed3 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c

[Bug c++/65869] Incorrect overload resolution in function return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65869 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

  1   2   3   4   >